Improving formative assessment practice with educational information technology

3rd International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications, EISTA 2005, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 361-366

  Vendlinski, Terry P ^a   Niemi, David M ^a   Wang, Jia ^a   Monempour, Sara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment development; Computerized tools; Web delivery

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SCAFFOLDS; TOOLS;

ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTERIZED TOOLS; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN WORKSPACE; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; WEB DELIVERY; WEB-BASED ASSESSMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84896947036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2001).
2. Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and Instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
3. Nathan, M., Koedinger, K., & Martha, W. (2001, April 2001). The expert blindspot: when content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge collide. Paper presented at the 2001 AERA Annual Meeting, Seattle WA.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (Eds.). (1999). Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications (Vol. 24). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Zull, J. (2002). The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice of Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 50(2), 139-148.
8. Wilson, M. (Ed.). (2004). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
9. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. (2004). Designing assessments for instruction and accountability: an application of validity theory to assessing scientific inquiry. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 74-104). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
10. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Clark, R. C, & Mayer, R. E. (2003). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass / Pfeiffer.
12. Baker, E. L. (1997, Autumn). Model-based performance assessment. Theory Into Practice, 36, 247-254.
13. Baker, E. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 269-282.
14. Niemi, D. (1996). Assessing conceptual understanding in mathematics: Representation, problem solutions, justifications, and explanations. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 351-363.
15. Klein, D. C. D., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Baker, E. L. (1996). A cognitive demands analysis of innovative technologies (Report to ISX/DODEA). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
16. Baker, E. L., and Aschbacher., P. R., Niemi, D., & Sato, E. (1992). CRESST performance assessment models: Assessing content area explanations. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards, and Student Testing.
17. Pellegrino, J. P., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Gelman, R., & Lee Gattis, M. (1995). Trends and developments in educational psychology in the United States. Educational studies and documents, 61, 23-52. Paris: UNESCO.
19. Minstrell, J. (2000). Student thinking and related assessment: Creating a facet-based learning environment. In N. S. Raju, J. W. Pellegrino, M. W. Berthenthal, K. J. Mitchell, & L. R Jones (Eds.), Grading the nation's report card: Research from the evaluation of NAEP (Report of the Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council; pp. 44-73). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered Classroom Assessment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing.
21. TIMSS International Study Center. (1995). TIMSS. http://timss.bc.edu/ TIMSS1/:BostonCollege