Model-based performance assessment

Theory into Practice

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 247-254

  Baker, Eva L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031215196     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405849709543775     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aschbacher, P.R., & Herman, J. (1991, Fall). Final report of the Humanitas program evaluation, 1990-91. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
2. Baker, E.L., Aschbacher, P.R., Herman, J.L., Chin-Chance, S., Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Niemi, D. (1996, April). Transferring validated performance assessment models to state/district school reform. Panel discussion at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
3. Baker, E.L., Aschbacher, P.R., Niemi, D., & Sato, E. (1992). CRESST performance assessment models: Assessing content area explanations. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
4. Baker, E.L., Aschbacher, P., Niemi, D., Sato, E., & Redfield, D. (1992, April). Issues in large-scale performance assessment. Invited minicourse presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association/National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco.
5. Baker, E.L., Freeman, M., & Clayton, S. (1991). Cognitive assessment of history for large-scale testing. In M.C. Wittrock & E.L. Baker (Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 131-153). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Baker, E.L., Niemi, D., Herl, H., Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Staley, L., & Linn, R. L. (1996). Report on the content area performance assessments (CAPA): A collaboration among the Hawaii Department of Education, the Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) and the teachers and children of Hawaii (Final Deliverable). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
7. Baker, E.L., & O'Neil, H.F., Jr. (1994). Performance assessment and equity: A view from the USA. Assessment in Education, 1(1), 11-26. (Reprinted in M.B. Kane [Ed.] [1996], Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.)
8. Baker, E.L., & O'Neil, H.F., Jr. (1994). Performance assessment and equity: A view from the USA. Assessment in Education, 1(1), 11-26. (Reprinted in M.B. Kane [Ed.] [1996], Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.)
9. Baker, E.L., & O'Neil, H.F., Jr. (1995). Computer technology futures for the improvement of assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 37-45.
10. Baker, E.L., O'Neil, H.F., Jr., & Linn, R.L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessments. American Psychologist, 48, 1210-1218.
11. Chung, G.K.W.K., O'Neil, H.F., Jr., Herl, H.E., & Dennis, R.A. (1997, March). Use of networked collaborative concept mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes. In H.F. O'Neil, Jr. (Chair), An integrated simulation approach to assessment. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
12. Goals 2000: Educate America act. P. L. 103-227, March 31, 1994.
13. Herl, H.E., O'Neil, H.F., Jr., Chung, G.K.W.K., & Schacter, J. (1997, March). Feasibility of an online concept mapping construction and scoring system. In H.F. O'Neil, Jr. (Chair), An integrated simulation approach to assessment. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
14. Mayer, R.E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 3, 151-161.
15. Mayer, R.E., & Wittrock, M. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47-62). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
16. National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL/ Newark, DE: National Council of Teachers of English/International Reading Association.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
18. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education. A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American people. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The National Education Goals report, 1991: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. National Education Goals Panel. (1996). The National Education Goals report, 1996. Executive summary. Commonly asked questions about standards and assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. National Science Education Standards. (1996). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Stecher, B.M., Rann, M., Ruby, A., Alt, M., Robyn, A., & Ward, B. (1996). Using alternative assessments in vocational education (MR-836-NCRVE/ UCB). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
23. U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools. A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1992). Skills and tasks for jobs: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.