Effects of Visual Stimulus on Response Behavior of Control-on-Display Interface

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 291-302

  Lim, Ji Hyoun ^a   Ryu, Taebeum ^b   Kim, Youngsu ^c  

^a Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

^b Hanbat National University   (South Korea)

^c Performance Improvement Ernst and Young Advisory   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTER OF AREAS; DEVIATION VECTOR; FULL FACTORIAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCES; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; RESPONSE BEHAVIOR; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULUS;

USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84896883956     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2013.858459     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altinsoy, M. E., & Merchel, S. (2009). Audio tactile feedback design for touch screens. In M. E. Altinsoy, U. Jekosch, & S. Brewster (Eds.), Haptic and audio interaction design 2009 (pp. 136-144). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2. Apple Inc. (2011). Graphics and drawing in iOS. In Drawing and printing guide for iOS. iOS Developer Library. Retrieved from http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/2DDrawing/Conceptual/DrawingPrintingiOS/GraphicsDrawingOverview/GraphicsDrawingOverview.html. Last accessed September 1, 2011.
3. Balagtas-Fernandez, F., Forrai, J., & Hussmann, H. (2009). Evaluation of user interface design and input methods for applications on mobile touch screen devices. Paper presented at the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part I (INTERACT '09).
4. Bates, T., & Stough, C. (1998). Improved reaction time method, information processing speed, and intelligence. Intelligence, 26, 53-62.
5. Becker, S. (2008). The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional? Vision Science, 48, 664-684.
6. Bock, O., & Eversheim, U. (2000). The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study, Behavioral Brain Research, 108, 85-90.
7. Buckolz, E., Heywey, D., Khan, M., & Alain, C. (1994). The influence of attention and response factors upon the spatial pre-cue effect. Human Movement Science, 13, 719-744.
8. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusion? Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 109-113.
10. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Importance of pre-cue location in directing attention. Acta Psychologia, 76, 201-211.
11. Deary, I. J., Der, G. & Ford, G. (2001). Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study. Intelligence, 29, 389-399.
12. Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z. (2000). Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Research, 40, 1269-1292.
13. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R Compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
14. Gartner Inc. (2010). Gartner says touchscreen mobile device sales will grow 97 percent in 2010. Retreived from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1313415
15. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M. C., & Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action, Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
16. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusion affect planning but not control, Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 288-292.
17. Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475-495.
18. Hoffman, D. D. (1998). Visual intelligence: How can we see. New York, NY: Norton.
19. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 311-338.
20. Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S. H., Jin, B. S., Han, Y. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2013). A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 604-618.
21. Jensen, A. R., & Munro, E. (1979). Reaction time, movement time and intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 121-126.
22. Jin, Z. X., Plocher, T., & Liana, K. (2007). Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: Button size and spacing. In S. Constantine (Ed.), Universal access in human computer interaction. Coping with diversity (pp. 933-941). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
24. Koskela, T. & Vilpola, I. (2004). Usability of MobiVR concept: Towards large virtual touch screen for mobile devices. In S. Brewster et al. (Ed.), Mobile human-computer interaction-MobileHCI 2004 (pp. 749-762). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Kwon, S., Lee, D., & Chung, M. K. (2009). Effect of key size and activation area on the performance of a regional error correction method in a touch-screen QWERTY keyboard, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 888-893.
26. Laurel, B. K. (1986). Interface as mimesis. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 67-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Mendoza, J., Hansen, S., Glazebrook, C. M., Keetch, K. M. & Elliot, D. (2005). Visual illusion affect both movement planning and on-line control: A multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action. Human Movement Science, 24, 760-773.
28. Neubauer, A. C., Riemann, R., Mayer, R., & Angleitner, A. (1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 885-894.
29. Norman, D., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Parhi, P., Karlson, A. K., & Bederson, B. B. (2006). Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. Paper presented at the 8th conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '06), Helsinki, Finland, September 12-15, 2006. New York. NY.
31. Park, Y. S., & Han, S. H. (2010). Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: Effects of touch key size and touch key location. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 68-76.
32. Perry, K. B., & Hourcade, J. P. (2008). Evaluating one handed thumb tapping on mobile touchscreen devices. Proceedings of graphics interface 2008 (GI '08), 57-64.
33. Pickering, J. A. (1986). Touch-sensitive screens: The technologies and their application, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 249-269.
34. Schellekens, J. M. H., Huizing, F., & Kalverboer, A. F. (1986). The influence of movement amplitude on pre-cue-processing. Human Movement Science, 5, 249-262.
35. Sears, A., & Zha, Y. (2003). Data enty for mobile devices using soft keyboards: understanding the effects of keyboard size and user tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 163-184.
36. Sun, X., Plocher, T., & Qu, W. (2007). An empirical study on the smallest comfortable button/icon size on touch screen. In A. Nuray (Ed.), Usability and internationalization. HCI and Culture (pp. 615-621). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
37. Weisstein, E. W. (2013a) Circumcircle. From MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Circumcircle.html
38. Weisstein, E. W. (2013b). Geometric Centroid. From MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeometricCentroid.html
39. Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 293-308.