Fetal heart pathology on postmortem 3-T magnetic resonance imaging

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 223-229

  Sandaite, Inga ^a,b   Dymarkowski, Steven ^a   De Catte, Luc ^a   Moerman, Philippe ^a   Gewillig, Marc ^a   Fedele, Luigi ^b   Deprest, Jan ^a   Claus, Filip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR CANAL; ATRIOVENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT; AUTOPSY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHROMOSOME DELETION 22Q11; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EBSTEIN ANOMALY; FALLOT TETRALOGY; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; FETUS DISEASE; FETUS HEART; GESTATIONAL AGE; GOLD STANDARD; GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HEART VENTRICLE SEPTUM DEFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; POSTMORTEM MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY VALVE ATRESIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TWIN PREGNANCY; VOLUMETRY; FETAL DISEASES; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL;

FETAL DISEASES; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84896866221     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4283     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890-900.
2. Jaeggi ET, Sholler GF, Jones OD, Cooper SG. Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre- versus postnatally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:380-5.
3. Young ID, Clarke M. Lethal malformations and perinatal mortality: a 10 year review with comparison of ethnic differences. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295:89-91.
4. Gembruch U Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:1283-98.
5. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et al. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS study group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:821-7.
6. Oggè G, Gaglioti P, Maccanti S, et al. Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease with four-chamber and outflow-tract views: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:779-84.
7. Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2009;155:26-31, 31.e1.
8. Garne E, Stoll C, Clementi M. Euroscan group. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17(5):386-91.
9. Rushton DI. Prognostic role of the perinatal postmortem. Br J Hosp Med 1994;52:450-4.
10. Saller DN, Jr, Lesser KB, Harrel U, et al. The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. JAMA 1995;273:663-5.
11. Adappa R, Paranjothy S, Roberts Z, Cartlidge PHT. Perinatal and infant autopsy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2007;92:F49-F50.
12. Khong TY, Tanner AR. Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: the influence of 'organ retention' controversy and new consent process. J Paediatr Child Health 2006;42(6):366-9.
13. Brodlie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW, et al. Ten years of neonatal autopsies in a tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. BMJ 2002;324:761-3.
14. Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996 Oct 26;348(9035):1139-41.
15. Ros PR, Li KC, Vo P, et al. Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8(3):303-8.
16. Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA, et al. Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(3):317-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.8844.
17. Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(1):e142-8. Review.
18. Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH. Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 2005;2-8;365(9466):1271-73.
19. Huisman TA. Magnetic resonance imaging: an alternative to autopsy in neonatal death? Semin Neonatol 2004;9(4):347-53.
20. Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24(1):22-7.
21. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(1):41-6.
22. Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ, et al. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 2009;374(9688):467-75.
23. Votino C, Jani J, Verhoye M, et al. Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks' gestation: a comparison of high-fiels MRI at 9.4T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:437-44.
24. Sandaite I, De Catte L, Moerman P, et al. A morphometric study of the human fetal heart on post-mortem 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(4):318-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.4070. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
25. Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW. Congenital heart disease in 56109 births. Incidence Nat Hist Circulation 1971;43(3):323-32.
26. Carvalho JS, Mavrides E, Shinebourne EA, et al. Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects. Heart 2002;88:387-391, 1355-6037.