Review of options for structural sensitivity calculations

41st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  van Keulen, F ^a   Haftke, R T ^b   Qu, X Y ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Derivatives; Design sensitivities; Review; Shape design variables

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATIONS; CONTINUUM DERIVATIVES; DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN SENSITIVITY; DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHAPE DESIGN VARIABLES; STRUCTURAL SENSITIVITY; UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA;

DERIVATIVES; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; REVIEWS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84896852455     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (83)

1. Akgiin, M., R. Haftka, K. Wu, and J. Walsh (1999). Sensitivity of lumped constraints using the adjoint method, aiaa paper 99-1314. In Proceedings, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, pp. 1003-1013. St. Louis, Missouri, April 12-15.
2. Andrew, A. and R. Tan (1996). Computation of derivatives of repeated eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors by simultaneous iteration. AIAA Journal 34 (10), 2214-2216.
3. Andrew, A. and R. Tan (1999). Computation of mixed partial derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors by simultaneous iteration. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 15, 641-649.
4. Argyris, J. and H. Mlejnek (1986). Die Meth-ode der Finiten Elemente, Volume Vol I: Verschiebungsmethode in der Statik. Braunschweig, Vieweg. (In German).
5. Arora, J., T.-H. Lee, and J. Cardoso (1992). Structural, shape sensitivity analysis: Relationship between material derivative and control volume approaches. AIAA Journal 30(6), 1638-1648.
6. Barthelemy, B., C. Chon, and R. Haftka (1988). Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 4, 249-265. Presented at the First World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Austin, Texas, September 1986.
7. Barthelemy, B. and R. Haftka (1988). Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity. In Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, pp. 88-2284. Williamsburg, VA, April 18-20.
8. Bathe, K. and E. Dvorkin (1983). On the automatic solution of non-linear finite element equations. Computers & Structures 17, 871-879.
9. Beliveau, J.-G., S. Cogan, G. Lallement, and F. Ayer (1996). Iterative least-squares calculation for modal eigenvector sensitivity. AIAA Journal 34(2), 385-391.
10. Bischof, C., A. Carle, P. Khademi, and A. Mauer (1996). The adifor 2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of fortran 77 programs. IEEE Computational Science & Engineering 3, 18-32.
11. Borggaard, J. and D. Pelletier (1998). Optimal shape design in forced convection using adaptive finite elements, aiaa 98-0908. AIAA 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV.
12. Borggaard, J. and A. Verma (1999). On efficient solutions to the continuous sensitivity equation using automatic differentiation. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, Accepted for publication.
13. Brandon, J. (1984). Derivation and significance of second-order modal design sensitivities. AIAA Journal 22(5), 723-724.
14. Brandon, J. (1991). Second-order design sensitivities to assess the applicability of sensitivity analysis. AIAA Journal 29(1), 135-139.
15. Bugeda, G. and E. Onate (1995). Optimum aerodynamic shape design including mesh adaptivity. Int. J. Numerical Methods in Fluids 20, 915-934.
16. Bugeda, G. and E. Onate (1999). Optimum aerodynamic shape design for fluid flow problems including mesh adaptivity. Int. J. Numerical Methods in Fluids 30, 161-178.
17. Burczynski, T., J. Kane, and C. Balakr-ishna (1997). Comparison of shape design sensitivity analysis formulations via material derivative-adjoint variable and implicit differentiation techniques for 3-d and 2-d curved boundary element. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 142, 89-109.
18. Caxle, A., M. Fagan, and L. Green (1998, September 2-4). Preliminary results from the application of automated adjoint code generation to cfl3d. In 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA /ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Volume Part 2, AIAA 98-4807, pp. 807-817.
19. Cheng, G., Y. Gu, and Y. Zhou (1989). Accuracy of semi-analytic sensitivity analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 6, 113-128.
20. Cheng, G. and N. Olhoff (1993). Rigid body motion test against error in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis. Structural Optimization 46, 515-527.
21. Choi, K. and J. Park (1990). Optimal design of nonlinear structural systems with critical loads. SAE Transactions V99, Sect6, 1141-1153.
22. Choi, K. and S.-L. Twu (1989). Equivalence of continuum and discrete methods of shape design sensitivity analysis. AIAA Journal 27(10), 1418-1424.
23. Crisfield, M. (1991). Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, Volume 1: Essentials. John Wiley & Sons.
24. de Boer, H. and F. van Keulen (1997). Error analysis of refined semi-analytical design sensitivities. Structural Optimization 14, 242-247.
25. de Boer, H. and F. van Keulen (1998). Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities. Technical Report LTM 1184, Delft University of Technology. Int. J. Solids and Structures. In press,.
26. de Boer, H. and F. van Keulen (1999). Refined second order semi-analytical design sensitivities. Technical report, Delft University of Technology. To appear in proceedings of WCSMO-3, Buffalo NY, 1999.
27. Eriksson, A. (1994). Fold lines for sensitivity analyses in structural instability. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 114, 77-101.
28. Fenyes, P. and R. Lust (1991). Error analysis of semianalytic displacement derivatives for shape and sizing variables. AIAA Journal 29, 271-279.
29. Fox, R. and M. Kapoor (1968). Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. AIAA Journal 5(12), 2426-2429.
30. Friswell, M. (1995). Calculation of second and higher Order eigenvector derivatives. J. Guidance 18(4), 919-921.
31. Fuglsang, P. and H. Madsen (1999). Optimization method for wind turbine rotors. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 80, 191-206.
32. Godoy, L., E. Taroco, and R. Feijoo (1994). Second-order sensitivity analysis in vibration and buckling problems. Int. J. Numerical Methods in Engineering 37, 3999-4014.
33. Griewank, A., D. Juedes, and J. Utke (1996). Adol-c, a package for the automatic differentiation of algorithms written in c/c-(-h TOMS 22(2), 131-167.
34. Gunzburger, M. (1999). Sensitivities, adjoints and flow optimization. Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 31, 53-58.
35. Haftka, R. (1985). Sensitivity calculations for iteratively solved problems,. Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 21, 1535-1546.
36. Haftka, R. (1993). Semi-analytical static nonlinear structural sensitivity analysis. AIAA Journal 31, 1307-1312.
37. Haftka, R. and H. Adelman (1989). Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Structural Optimization 1, 137-151.
38. Haftka, R. and Z. Giirdal (1990). Elements of structural optimization (Second revised edition ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Heo, J. and K. Ehmann (1991). A method for substructural sensitivity synthesis. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 113, 201-208.
40. Hinton, E., J. Sienz, and S. Afonso (1995). Experiences with olhoff's "exact" semi-analytical sensitivity algorithm. In N. Olhoff and G. Rozvany (Eds.), WCSMO-1, First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, pp. 41-46. Pergamon.
41. Hsu, Y.-L. (1994). A review of structural shape optimization. Computers in Industry 26, 3-13.
42. Hu, H. (1998, September 2-4). "sensitivity derivatives of a rotor cfd code via automatic differentiation". In 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Volume Part 1, AIAA 98-4724, pp. 159-164.
43. Jankovic, M. (1994). Exact nth derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 17(1), 136-144.
44. Jensen, H. and A. Sepulveda (1998). Design sensitivity metric for structural dynamic response. AIAA Journal 36(9), 1686-1693.
45. Joun, M. and S. Hwang (1998). Die shape optimal design in three-dimensional shape metcil extrusion by the finite element method. Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 41, 311-335.
46. Kleiber, M. and T. Hien (1997). Parameter sensitivity of inelastic buckling and post-buckling response. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 145, 239-262.
47. Kwak, B. (1994). A review on shape optimal design and sensitivity analysis. Structural Eng./Earthquake Eng. 10(A), 159s-174s.
48. Kwon, T., B. Lee, and W. Lee (1999). An approximation technique for design sensitivity analysis of the critical load in non-linear structures. Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 45, 1727-1736.
49. Lallemand, B., P. Level, H. Duveau, and B. Mahieux (1999). Eigensolutions sensitivity analysis using a sub-structuring method. Computers & Structures 71, 257-265.
50. Lin, R., H. Du, and J. Ong (1993). Sensitivity based method for structural dynamic model improvement. Computers & Structures 47(3)i. 349-369.
51. Lin, R. and M. Lim (1995). Structural sensitivity analysis via reduced-order analytical model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 121, 345-359.
52. Lin, R. and M. Lim (1997). Derivation of structural design sensitivities from vibration test data. Journal of Sound and Vibration 201 (5), 613-631.
53. Lin, R., Z. Wang, and M. Lim (1996). A practical algorithm for the efficient computation of eigenvector sensitivities. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 130, 355-367.
54. Lund, E. and N. Olhoff (1994). Shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues using "exact" numerical differentiation of finite element matrices. Structural Optimization 8, 52-59.
55. Lyness, J. (1967). Numerical algorithms based on the theory of complex variables. In Proc. ACM 22nd Nat. Conf., Thomas Book, Co., Washington DC, pp. 124-134.
56. Lyness, J. and C. Moler (1967). Numerical differentiation of analytic functions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 4, 202-210.
57. Mlejnek, H. (1992). Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivities and its improvement by the "natural method". Structural Optimization 4, 128-131.
58. Mroz, Z. and R.T. Haftka (1994). Design sensitivity analysis of non-linear structures in regular and critical states. International Journal of Solids and Structures 31, 2071-2098.
59. Nelson, R. (1976). Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives. AIAA Journal 14(9), 1201-1205.
60. Newman, J., A. Taylor, R. Barnwell, P. Newman, and G. Hou (1999). Overview of sensitivity analysis and shape optimization for complex aerodynamic configurations. Journal of Aircraft 36(1), 87-96.
61. Newman, J., D. Whitfield, and W. Anderson (1999, June 28-July 1). A step-size independent approach for multidisciplinary sensitivity analysis and design optimization. In 17th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, pp. 12-22.
62. Noguchi, H. and T. Hisada (1993). Sensitivity analysis in post-buckling problems of shell structures. Computers & Structures 47(4/5), 699-710.
63. Olhoff, N. and J. Rasmussen (1991). Study of inaccuracy in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis-a model problem. Structural Optimization 3, 203-213.
64. Olhoff, N., J. Rasmussen, and E. Lund (1993). A method of "exact" numerical differentiation for error elimination in finite-element-based semi-analytical shape sensitivity analyses. Mechanics of Structures & Machines 21, 1-66.
65. Ozaki, I. and T. Terano (1993). Applying an automatic differentiation technique to sensitivity analysis in design optimization problems. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 14, 143-151.
66. Park, J. and K. Choi (1990). Design sensitivity analysis of critical load factor for nonlinear strutural systems. Computers & Structures 36(5), 823-838.
67. Pedersen, P., G. Cheng, and J. Rasmussen (1988). On accuracy-problems for semi-analytical sensitivity analyses. Mechanics of Structures & Machines 17, 373-384.
68. Rail, L. B. and G. F. Corliss (1996). An introduction to automatic differentiation. In Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Applications, and Tools, pp. 1-18.
69. Sandu, A., G. Charmichael, and F. Potra (1995). Sensitivity analysis for atmospheric chemistry via automatic differentiation. Paper presented at SAMO 95, 25-27th September 1995, Belgirate, Italy.
70. Shiriaev, D. and A. Griewank (1996). Adol-f: Automatic differentiation of fort ran codes. In Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Applications, and Tools, pp. 375-384.
71. Squire, W. and G. Trapp (1998). Using complex variable to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Rev. 40(1), 110-112.
72. Tan, R., A. Andrew, and F. Hong (1994). Iterative computation of second-order derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 10, 1-9.
73. Ting, T. (1992a). Accelerated subspace iteration for eigenvector derivatives. AIAA Journal 30(8), 2114-2118.
74. Ting, T. (1992b). Design sensitivity analysis of structural frequency response. AIAA Journal 31 (10), 1965-1967.
75. Tseng, C. and J. Arora (1989). Numerical verification of design sensitivity analysis. AIAA Journal 27(1), 117-119.
76. van Keulen, F. and H. de Boer (1998a, September 2-4). Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities for buckling. In 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Volume Part 1, AIAA 98-4761, pp. 420-429.
77. van Keulen, F. and H. de Boer (1998b). Rigorous improvement of semi-analytical design sensitivities, by exact differentiation of rigid body motions. Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 42, 71-91.
78. Walsh, J., K. Young, F. Tarzanin, J. Hirsh, and D. Young (1998, September 2-4). Optimization issues with complex ro-torcraft comprehensive analysis. In 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Volume Part 2, AIAA 98-4889.
79. Wu, C. and J. Arora (1987). Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear structural response using incremental procedure. AIAA Journal 25, 1118-1125.
80. Wu, C. and J. Arora (1988). Design sensitivity analysis of non-linear buckling load. Computational Mechanics 3, 129-140.
81. Zhang, O. and A. Zerva (1997). Accelerated iterative procedure for calculation eigenvector derivatives. AIAA Journal 35(2), 340-348.
82. Zhang, W. and M. Domaszewski (1999). Efficient sensitivity analysis and optimization of shell structures by the abaqus code. Structural Optimization 18, 173-182.
83. Zhang, Y., D. Nguyen, and J. Hou (1992). An alternative formulation for design sensitivity analysis of linear structural dynamic systems. Computers & Structures 44 (3), 689-692.