An informetric study of knowledge flow among scientific fields (RIP)

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 1030-1036

  Yan, Erjia ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Kong, Xiangnan ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; INFORMETRIC STUDIES; KNOWLEDGE FLOW; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS; WORK-IN-PROGRESS;

EID: 84896816119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Autant-Bernard, C., Mairesse, J., & Massard, N. (2007). Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 341-350.
2. Buter, R. K., Noyons, E. C. M., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Identification of converging research areas using publication and citation data. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 19-27.
3. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
4. Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2008). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(4), 551-564.
5. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215-218.
6. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, A. D. (1993). Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-599.
7. Lenoir, T. (1997). Instituting science: the cultural production of scientific disciplines. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Lewison, G., Rippon, I., & Wooding, S. (2005). Tracking knowledge diffusion through citations. Research Evaluation, 14(1), 5-14.
9. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. (2005). The balance of trade between disciplines: do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 139-150.
10. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
11. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423-443.
12. Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187-195.
13. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287.
14. Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54(3), 347-362.
15. Stigler, S. M. (1994). Citation patterns in the journals of statistics and probability. Statistical Science, 9(1), 94-108.
16. Van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183-187.
17. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.
18. Yan, E., Ding, Y., Cronin, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (forthcoming). A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science. Journal of Informetrics.
19. Zhang, L., Liu, X., Janssens, F., Liang, L., & Glänzel, W. (2010). Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. Journal of Informetrics, 4(2), 185-193.