Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 468-483

  Haustein, Stefanie ^a,b   Peters, Isabella ^c   Bar Ilan, Judit ^d   Priem, Jason ^e   Shema, Hadas ^d   Terliesner, Jens ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Science Metrix   (Canada)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC; IMPACT DATA; ON-LINE TOOLS; PROFESSIONAL LIFE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS; SOCIAL MEDIA TOOLS;

SURVEYS; TOOLS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84896814183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Bar-Ilan, J. (2011). Articles tagged by 'bibliometrics' on Mendeley and CiteULike.Paper presented at the Metrics 2011 Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research.
2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2012a). JASIST@mendeley. Presented at the ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics. Evanston, IL. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar-ilan
3. Bar-Ilan, J. (2012b). JASIST 2001-2010. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6), 24-28.
4. Bar-Ilan, J., Shema, H., & Thelwall (in press). Bibliographic References in Web 2.0. In B. Cronin, & C. Sugimoto (eds.), Bibliometrics and Beyond: Metrics- Based Evaluation of Scholarly Research, Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montréal, Canada (Vol. 1, pp. 98-109).
6. Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1994). The scholar's courtesy: A survey of acknowledgement behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 50, 165-196.
7. Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4). Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123
8. Ganegan, F. (2012, August). Filtering the research record and farming big data. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://www.swets.com/blog/filtering-theresearch-record-and-farming-big-data#
9. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, London: Aldine Transactions.
10. Groth, P., & Gurney, T. (2010). Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study. Presented at the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC, USA.
11. Haustein, S. (in press). Readership Metrics. In B. Cronin, & C. Sugimoto (eds.), Bibliometrics and Beyond: Metrics-Based Evaluation of Scholarly Research, Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Haustein, S., & Peters, I. (2012). Using Social Bookmarks and Tags as Alternative Indicators of Journal Content Description. First Monday, 17(11). Retrieved January 21, 2013 from www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4110/3357
13. Haustein, S., & Siebenlist, T. (2011). Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 446-457.
14. Haustein, S., Golov, E., Luckanus, K., Reher, S., & Terliesner, J. (2010). Journal evaluation and science 2.0. Using social bookmarks to analyze reader perception. In Book of Abstracts of the 11th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden, The Netherlands (pp. 117-119).
15. Henning, V., & Reichelt, J. (2008). Mendeley: A Last.fm for research? In Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Escience, Indianapolis, IN, USA (pp. 327-328).
16. Kurtz, M. J. & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 1-64.
17. Letierce, J., Passant, A., Decker, S., & Breslin, J.G. (2010). Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference, Raleigh, NC, USA.
18. Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montréal, Canada (Vol. 2, pp. 451-551).
19. Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2012). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461-471.
20. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis -A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
21. Mahrt, M., Weller, K., & Peters, I. (in press). Twitter in Scholarly Communication. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and Society. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
22. Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12(2), 61-90.
23. Mendeley,(2012). Mendeley Global Research Report. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://www.mendeley.com/global-research-report/#.UPxyUqPi58E
24. Nielsen, F. (2007). Scientific citations in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12(8). Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1997/1872
25. Piwowar, H. (2013). Value all research products. Nature, 493, 159.
26. Ponte, D., & Simon, J. (2011). Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researchers' opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials Review, 37(3), 149-156.
27. Price, D. J. de Solla, & Gürsey, S. (1976). Studies in Scientometrics I. Transience and continuance in scientific authorship. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 1(2), 17-24.
28. Priem, J. (in press). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin, & C. Sugimoto (eds.), Bibliometrics and Beyond: Metrics-Based Evaluation of Scholarly Research, Cambridge: MIT Press.
29. Priem, J. (2010). Tweet by Jason Priem on September 28, 2010. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from https://twitter.com/#!/jasonpriem/status/25844968813
30. Priem, J., & Costello, K. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. doi:10.1002/meet.14504701201/full
31. Priem, J., Costello, K., & Dzuba, T. (2011). First-year graduate students just wasting time? Prevalence and use of Twitter among scholars. Presented at the Metrics 2011 Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research, New Orleans, LA, USA. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://jasonpriem.org/selfarchived/5uni-poster.png
32. Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745
33. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Nylon, C. (2010). alt-metrics: a manifesto. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
34. Reher, S., & Haustein, S. (2010). Social bookmarking in STM: Putting services to the acid test. Online - Leading Magazine for Information Professionals, 34(6), 34-42.
35. Research Councils UK. (2011, March). Types of impact. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/impacts/TypologyofResearchImpacts.pdf
36. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2007). The missing link: Journal usage metrics. Aslib Proceedings, 59(3), 222-228.
37. Schlögl, C., & Stock, W. G. (2004). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals -Citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(13), 1155-1168.
38. Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information. PLoS ONE, 7(5): e35869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035869
39. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association.
40. Thelwall, M. (2010). Webometrics: emergent or doomed? Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 15(4). Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://informationr.net/ir/15-4/colis713.html
41. Thelwall, M. (2012). Journal impact evaluation: A webometric perspective. Scientometrics, 92, 429-441.
42. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 81-135.
43. Weller, K., & Peters, I. (2012). Citations in Web 2.0. In A. Tokar, M. Beurskens, S. Keuneke, M. Mahrt, I. Peters, C. Puschmann, et al. (eds.), Science and the Internet (pp. 211-224). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
44. rd ACM International Conference on Web Science, Koblenz, Germany. Retrieved January 21, 2013 from http://journal.webscience.org/500/1/153_paper.pdf
45. Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar. How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic, UK.