Evaluation of health care system reform in Hubei province, China

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 2262-2277

  Sang, Shuping ^a   Wang, Zhenkun ^a   Yu, Chuanhua ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

China; Evaluation; Health care system reform; Indicators

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH STATUS; POLICY REFORM; RURAL SOCIETY; URBAN SOCIETY;

ARTICLE; CHINA; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RANK SUM TEST; RURAL AREA; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION; EVALUATION STUDY;

CHINA; HUBEI;

CHINA; HEALTH CARE REFORM; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84896804194     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110202262     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Deepening the Health Care System Reform. Available online: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/shfz/yywstzgg/ygzc/t20090408_359822.htm (accessed on 1 September 2013).
2. Implementation Plan for the Recent Priorities of the Health Care System Reform (2009-2011). Available online: http://shs.ndrc.gov.cn/ygzc/t20090408_359216.htm (accessed on 1 September 2013).
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Monitoring and Evaluation of China's Health System Reform: Global Perspective on A Comprehensive Framework; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
4. Hu, S.L. Recommendations on Health system reform monitoring and evaluation framework in China from international organizations. Chin. J. Health Policy 2010, 3, 4-6.
5. Roberts, M.; Hsiao, W.; Berman, P.; Reich, M. Getting Heath Reform Right: A Guide to Improving Performance and Equity; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
6. The NHS Performance Assessment Framework. Available online: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4057184.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2013).
7. Lozano, R.; Soliz, P.; Gakidou, E.; Abbott-Klafter, J.; Feehan, M.D.; Vidal, C.; Ortiz, P.J.; Murray, J.L.C. Benchmarking of performance of Mexican States with effective coverage. Lancet 2006, 368, 1729-1741.
8. He, J.W. The methodological strategy for National Health Policy evaluation: The case of policy evaluation of Mexico's Seguro popular de Salud. Chin. Public. Admin. Rev. 2009, 8, 161-170.
9. National Health Ministers' Benchmarking Working Group. First National Report on Health Sector Performance Indicators: Public Hospitals The State of the Play; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra, Australia, 1996.
10. Daniels, N.; Bryant, J.; Castano, R.A.; Dantes, O.G.; Khan, K.S.; Pannarunothai, S. Benchmarks of fairness for healthcare reform: A policy tool for developing countries. Bull. World Health Org. 2000, 78, 740-750.
11. Daniels, N.; Kennedy, B.; Kawachi, I. Why justice is good for our health: The social determinants of health inequalities. Daedalus 1999, 128, 215-252.
12. Health Bureau of Hubei Province. Hubei Health Statistics 2009; Printing House of Statistics Bureau of Hubei Province: Wuhan, China, 2010.
13. Health Bureau of Hubei Province. Hubei Health Statistics 2010; Printing House of Statistics Bureau of Hubei Province: Wuhan, China, 2011.
14. Health Bureau of Hubei Province. Hubei Health Statistics 2011; Printing House of Statistics Bureau of Hubei Province: Wuhan, China, 2012.
15. Dolan, J.G, Shared decision-making-transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Educ. Couns. 2008, 73, 418-425.
16. Sun, Z.Q.; Wang, L., Medical Synthetic Evaluation and Its Application, 1st ed.; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 14-16.
17. Wind, Y; Saaty, T.L. Marketing application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Manag. Sci. 1980, 26, 641-658.
18. Carlsson, C; Walden, P., AHP in political group decisions: A study in the art of possibilities. Interfaces 1995, 25, 14-29.
19. Wang, Y.R.; Sun, Z.Q.; Huang, Z.N. Topsis method analysis by using SAS software. Chin. J. Health. Stat. 2003, 20, 119-121.
20. Wang, Y.R.; Sun, Z.Q. Review of medical synthetic evaluation research. J. Cent. S Uni. 2005, 30, 228-232.
21. Zhong, H.R.; Gu, X.P. Assessment of power system black-start schemes based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its sensitivity analysis. Automat. Electr. Pow. Syst. 2010, 16, 34-49.
22. Xu, J.P.; Wu, W., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Theory and Methods; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2006.
23. Jia, P.; Li, X.B.; Wang, J.X. Comparison of several kinds of typical comprehensive evaluation methods. Chin. J. Hosp. Stat. 2008, 15, 351-353.
24. Alma Ata Declaration. Available online: http://www.http://who.int/topics/primary_health_care/alma_ata_declaration/zh/ (accessed on 18 December 2013).
25. Ge, Y; Sen, G. China's Health System Reform: Issue, Root, Way Out; China Development Press: Beijing, China, 2007.
26. Wang, Y.P.; Zhou, X.S. Progress, outlook and implications of U.S. health care system reform. Chin. J. Health. Policy 2013, 6, 38-44.
27. Li, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Q.L. An integrated healthcare system: The strategic choice of Chinese Healthcare Reform. Chin. J. Health Policy 2012, 5, 10-16.