Ultrasound Assessment of Abnormal Fetal Growth

Seminars in Perinatology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-22

  Nyberg, David A ^a   Abuhamad, Alfred ^a   Ville, Yves ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS GROWTH; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; REVIEW; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

EID: 1542286178     PISSN: 01460005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (159)

1. Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, et al: Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 65:613-620, 1985
2. Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S: A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor. Obstet Gynecol 76:336-338, 1990
3. Wilcox M, Gardosi J, Mongelli M, et al: Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasound in a multicultural British population. Br Med J 307:588-591, 1993
4. Gardosi J, Mongelli M: Risk assessment adjusted for gestational age in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Br Med J 306:1509, 1993
5. Chervenak FA, Skupski DW, Romero R, et al: How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:228-237, 1998
6. Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, et al: Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: The influence of use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:462-470, 1989
7. Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A: Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged preganncy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:792-797, 1997
8. Warren WB, Peisner DB, Raju S, et al: Dating the early pregnancy by sequential appearance of embryonic structures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:747, 1989
9. Daya S: Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:903-908, 1987
10. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Laing FC, et al: Distinguishing normal from abnormal gestational sac growth in early pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 6:23-27, 1987
11. Robinson HP, Fleming JE: A critical evaluation of sonar "crown-rump length" measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82:702-710, 1975
12. Drumm JE, Clinch J, McKenzie G: The ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown rump length as a method of assessing gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 83:417-421, 1976
13. Daya S, Woods S, Ward S, et al: Early pregnancy assessment with transvaginal ultrasound scanning. Can Med Assoc J 144:441-446, 1996
14. Lasser DM, Peisner DB, Wollenbergh J, et al: First trimester fetal biometry using transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:104-108, 1993
15. McGregor SN, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, et al: Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown rump length dating curves. Am J Obstet Gynecol 70:344-348, 1987
16. Wisser J, Dirscheld P: Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:457-462, 1994
17. Hadlock FP: Sonographic estimation of fetal age and weight. Radiol Clin North Am 28:39-50, 1990
18. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Shah YP, et al: Estimating fetal age using multiple parameters: A prospective evaluation in a racially mixed population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:955-957, 1987
19. Bromley B, Frigoletto FD Jr, Harlow BL, et al: Biometric measurements in fetuses of different race and gender. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:395-402, 1993
20. Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P: Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14:12-16, 1999
21. Kallen K: Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: Advantages and systematic errors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002 20:558-63, 2002
22. Stebbins B, Jaffe R: Fetal biometry and gestational age estimation, in Jaffe R, Bui TH (eds): Textbook of Fetal Ultrasound. London, Parthenon Publishing, 1999, pp 47-57
23. Pierce BT, Hancock EG, Kovac CM, et al: Influence of gestational age and maternal height on fetal femur length calculations. Obstet Gynecol 975 Pt 1:742-746, 2001
24. Bromley B, Frigoletto FD Jr, Harlow BL, et al: Biometric measurements in fetuses of different race and gender. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3:395-402, 1993
25. Shipp TD, Bromley B, Mascola M, et al: Variation in fetal femur length with respect to maternal race. J Ultrasound Med 20:141-144, 2001
26. Davis RO, Cutter GR, Goldenberg RL, et al: Fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. A comparison by race and sex. J Reprod Med 38:201-206, 1993
27. Kurjak A, Kirkinen P, Latin V: Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: Report of 260 cases. Obstet Gynecol 56:281-284, 1980
28. Landon MB, Mintz MC, Gabbe SG: Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: Predictor of the large for gestational age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:115-121, 1989
29. Basel D, Lederer R, Diamant YZ: Longitudinal ultrasonic biometry of various parameters in fetuses with abnormal growth rate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:143-149, 1987
30. Hadlock FP: Ultrasound evaluation of fetal growth, in Callen PW (ed): Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1994, pp 129-143
31. Dudley NJ: Selection of appropriate ultrasound methods for estimation of fetal weight. Br J Radiol 68:385-388, 1995
32. Coombs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, et al: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol 82:365-370, 1993
33. Rose BI, McCallum WD: A simplified method for estimating fetal weight using ultrasound measurements. Obstet Gynecol 69:671-675, 1987
34. Medchill MT, Peterson CM, Garbaciak J: Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000 g). Obstet Gynecol 78:286-290, 1991
35. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 150:535-540, 1984
36. Smith GCS, Smith MFS, McNay MB, et al: The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birth-weight: Findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:186-190, 1997
37. Gore D, Williams M, O'Brien W, et al: Fetal abdominal circumference for prediction of intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 95:S78-S79, 2000 (4 suppl 1)
38. Chuang L, Hwang JY, Chang CH, et al: Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:991-996, 2002
39. Baum JD, Gussman D, Wirth JC 3rd: Clinical and patient estimation of fetal weight vs. ultrasound estimation. j Reprod Med 47:194-198, 2002
40. Robson SC, Gallivan S, Walkinshaw SA, et al: Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: Use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 82:359-64, 1993
41. Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, et al: Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:854-862, 1989
42. Edwards A, Goff J, Baker L: Accuracy and modifying factors of the sonographic estimation of fetal weight 26. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:187-190, 2001
43. Scott F, Beeby P, Abbott J, et al: New formula for estimating fetal weight below 1000 g: Comparison with existing formulas. J Ultrasound Med 15:669-672, 1996
44. Weiner CP, Sabbagha RE, Vaisrub N, et al: Ultrasonographic fetal weight prediction: Role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol 65:812-817, 1985
45. Jouannic JM, Grange G, Goffinet F, et al: Validity of sonographic formulas for estimating fetal weight below 1,250 g: A series of 119 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 16:254-258, 2001
46. Zelop CM: Prediction of fetal weight with the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:321-325, 2000
47. Schild RL, Fimmers R, Hansmann M: Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:445-452, 2000
48. Song TB, Moore TR, Lee JI, et al: Fetal weight prediction by thigh volume measurement with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 96:157-161, 2000
49. Lee W, Deter RL, Ebersole JD, et al: Birth weight prediction by three-dimensional ultrasonography: Fractional limb volume. J Ultrasound Med 20:1283-1292, 2001
50. Hooper PM, Mayes DC, Demianczuk NN: A model for foetal growth and diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction. Stat Med 21:95-112, 2002
51. Goldenberg RL, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, et al: Intrauterine growth retardation: Standards for diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:271-277, 1989
52. Altman DG, Chitty LS: Charts of fetal size. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:29-34, 1994
53. Marsal K, Persson PH, Larsen T, et al: Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonographically estimated fetal weights. Acta Paediatr Scand 85:843-848, 1996
54. Singer DB, Sung CJ, Wigglesworth JS: Fetal growth and maturation with standards for body and organ development, in Wigglesworth JS, Singer DB (eds): Textbook of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology. Boston, MA, Blackwell Science, 1991, pp 11-47
55. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J: In utero analysis of fetal growth: A sonographic weight standard. Radiology 181:129-133, 1991
56. Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Nadel AS, et al: Improved birth weight table for neonates developed from gestations dated by early ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 16:241-249, 1997
57. Hindmarsh PC, Geary MP, Rodeck CH, et al: Intrauterine growth and its relationship to size and shape at birth. Pediatr Res 52:263-268, 2002
58. Magnus P, Bakketeig LS, Hoffman H: Birth weight of relatives by maternal tendency to repeat small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births in successive pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 165:35-38, 1997 (suppl)
59. Wilcox MA, Newton CS, Johnson IR: Paternal influences on birthweight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74:15-18, 1995
60. Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, et al: Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 339:283-287, 1992
61. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, et al: Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynecol 108:830-834, 2001
62. Sciscione AC, Gorman R, Callan N: Adjustment of birth weight standards for maternal and infant characteristics improves the prediction of outcome in the small-for-gestational-age infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:544-547, 1996
63. Gestation Network http://www.gestation.net/birthweight_centiles/centile_online.htm administered by the West Midlands Perinatal Institute
64. Ong S, Lim MN, Fitzmaurice A, et al: The creation of twin centile curves for size. Br J Obstet Gynecol 109:753-758, 2002
65. Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JAD, et al: Identification of fetal growth retardation: Comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 82:230-236, 1993
66. Owen P, Ogston S: Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:110-117, 1998
67. Skinner Keelin O'Donoghue F, Gardeil R, Greene MJ, et al: Is fetal abdominal subcutaneous fat comparable with established indices of growth restriction? J Obstet Gynaecol 21:439-442, 2001
68. Matsumoto M, Yanagihara T, Hata T: Three-dimensional qualitative sonographic evaluation of fetal soft tissue. Hum Reprod 15:2438-2442, 2000
69. Yoshida SH, Unno N, Kagawa H, Shinozuka N, et al: Sonographic determination of fetal size from 20 weeks of gestation onward correlates with birth weight. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 27:205-211, 2001
70. Cetin I, Morpurgo PS, Radaelli T, et al: Fetal plasma leptin concentrations: Relationship with different intrauterine growth patterns from 19 weeks to term. Pediatr Res 48:646-651, 2000
71. Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, et al: Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:198-202, 2000
72. Kok JH, den Ouden AL, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al: Outcome of very preterm small for gestational age infants: The first nine years of life. Br J Obstet Gynecol 105:162-168, 1998
73. Fattal-Valevski A, Leitner Y, Kutai M, et al: Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: A 3-year follow-up. J Child Neurol 14:724-727, 1999 (abstr)
74. Soothill PW, Ajayi RA, Campbell S, et al: Relationship between fetal academia at cordocentesis and subsequent neurodevelopment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2:80-83, 1992
75. Rasmussen S, Irgens LM, Albrechtsen S, et al: Predicting preeclampsia in the second pregnancy from low birth weight in the first pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 965 Pt 1:696-700, 2000
76. Mitra SC, Seshan SV, Riachi LE: Placental vessel morphometry in growth retardation and increased resistance of the umbilical artery Doppler flow. J Matern Fetal Med 9:282-286, 2000
77. Snijders RJ, Sherrod C, Gosden CM, et al: Fetal growth retardation: Associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:547-555, 1993
78. Dicke JM, Crane JP: Sonographic recognition of major malformations and aberrant fetal growth in trisomic fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 10:433-438, 1991
79. Stipoljev F, Latin V, Kos M, et al: Correlation of confined placental mosaicism with fetal intrauterine growth retardation. A case control study of placentas at delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther 16:4-9, 2001
80. Devriendt K: Genetic control of intra-uterine growth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 92:29-34, 2000
81. Roberts AB, Mitchell JM, McCowan LM, et al: Ultrasonographic measurement of liver length in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1803 Pt 1:634-638, 1999
82. David C, Gabrielli S, Pilu G, et al: The head-to-abdomen circumference ratio: A reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:256-259, 1995
83. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Lucas MJ, et al: Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 96:321-327, 2000
84. Vik T, Vatten L, Jacobsen G, et al: Prenatal growth in symmetric and asymmetric small-for-gestational-age infants. Early Hum Dev 48:167-176, 1997
85. Blackwell SC, Moldenhauer J, Redman M, et al: Relationship between the sonographic pattern of intrauterine growth restriction and acid-base status at the time of cordocentensis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 264:191-193, 2001
86. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH, et al: FL/AC ratio: Poor predictor of intrauterine growth retardation. Invest Radiol 20:727-730, 1985
87. Williams MC, O'Brien WF: A comparison of birth weight and weight/length ratio for gestation as correlates of perinatal morbidity. J Perinatol 17:346-350, 1997
88. Brandon MWG, Kirman BH, Williams CE: Microcephaly. J Ment Sci 105:721, 1959
89. Bateman DA, Chiriboga CA: Dose-response effect of cocaine on newborn head circumference. Pediatrics 106:E33, 2000
90. Divon M, Chamberlain P, Sipos L, et al: Identification of the small for gestational age independent indices of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:1197-2003, 1986
91. Owen P, Maharaj S, Khan KS, et al: Interval between fetal measurements in predicting growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 97:499-504, 2001
92. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Ecker JL, et al: US evaluation of fetal growth: Prediction of neonatal outcomes. Radiology 223:153-161, 2002
93. Williams KP, Nwebube N: Abdominal circumference: A single measurement versus growth rate in the prediction of intrapartum Cesarean section for fetal distress. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:493-495, 2001
94. Silver LE, Decamps PJ, Korst LM, et al: Intrauterine growth restriction is accompanied by decreased renal volume in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1320-1325, 2003
95. Boito SM, Laudy JA, Struijk PC, et al: Three-dimensional US assessment of hepatic volume, head circumference, and abdominal circumference in healthy and growth-restricted fetuses. Radiology 223:661-665, 2002
96. Boito S, Struijk PC, Ursem NT, et al: Fetal brain/liver volume ratio and umbilical volume flow parameters relative to normal and abnormal human development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:256-261, 2003
97. Ott WJ: Diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: Comparison of ultrasound parameters. Am J Perinatol 19:133-137, 2002
98. Resnik R: Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 99:490-496, 2002
99. Benson CB, Belville JS, Lentini JF, et al: Intrauterine growth retardation: Diagnosis based on multiple parameters-A prospective study. Radiology 177:499-502, 1990
100. Benson CB, Boswell SB, et al: Improved prediction of intrauterine growth retardation with use of multiple parameters. Radiology 168:7-12, 1988
101. Hanna BD, Nelson MN, White-Traut RC, et al: Heart rate variability in preterm brain-injured and very-low-birth-weight infants. Biol Neonate 77:147-155, 2000
102. Nijhuis IJ, ten Hof J, Mulder EJ, et al: Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 89:27-33, 2000
103. Vindla S, James D, Sahota D: Computerised analysis of unstimulated and stimulated behaviour in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Biol 83:37-45, 1999
104. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, et al: Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. J Reprod Med 41:112-118, 1996
105. Devoe L, Golde S, Kilman Y, et al: A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:361-366, 2000
106. Bracero LA, Roshanfekr D, Byrne DW: Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer. J Matern Fetal Med 9:181-185, 2000
107. Hecher K, HackelÖer B: Cardiotocogram compared to Doppler investigation of the fetal circulation in the premature growth-retarded fetus: Longitudinal observations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:152-160, 1997
108. Ribbert LS, Visser GH, Mulder EJ, et al: Changes with time in fetal heart rate variation, movement incidences and haemodynamics in intrauterine growth retarded fetuses: A longitudinal approach to the assessment of fetal well being. Early Hum Dev 31:195-208, 1993
109. Manning FA, Snijders R, Harman CR, et al: Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:755-763, 1993
110. Habek D, Hodek B, Herman R, et al: Fetal biophysical profile and cerebro-umbilical ratio in assessment of perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 18:12-16, 2003
111. Kim SY, Khandelwal M, Gaughan JP, et al: Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful? Obstet Gynecol 102:471-476, 2003
112. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Harman CR: The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetalgrowth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:571-577, 2001
113. Magann EF, Isler CM, Chauhan SP, et al: Amniotic fluid volume estimation and the biophysical profile: A confusion of criteria. Obstet Gynecol 96:640-642, 2000
114. Petrovic O, Skunca E, Matejcic N: A simplified fetal biophysical profile. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 61:9-14, 1998
115. Tongsong T, Piyamongkol W, Anantachote A, et al: The rapid biophysical profile for assessment of fetal well-being. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25:431-436, 1999
116. Oz U, Kovanci E, Jeffress A, et al: Splenic artery Doppler in the prediction of the small-for-gestational age infant. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:346-350, 2002
117. Baschat AA, Gembruch U: The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:124-127, 2003
118. Bahado-Singh RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A, et al: The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:750-756, 1999
119. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Talone PE, et al: Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retardated fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:401-410, 1996
120. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Reiss I, et al: Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:407-413, 2000
121. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Harman CR: The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:571-577, 2001
122. Hecher K, Bilardo CM, Stigter RH, et al: Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: A longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:564-570, 2001
123. Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, et al: Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:140-146, 2002
124. Zarko A, Neilson JP: Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1379-1387, 1995
125. Marsal K: Intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:127-135, 2002
126. Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, et al: Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: Which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 80:1030-1038, 1992
127. Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, et al: Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: Comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:422-427, 1994
128. Baschat AA: Integrated fetal testing in growth restriction : combining multivessel Doppler and biophysical parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:1-8, 2003
129. Vergani P, Roncaglia N, Andreotti C, et al: Prognostic value of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses delivered near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:932-936, 2002
130. Schwartzler P, Homfray T, Campbell S, et al: Prenatal findings on ultrasound and X-ray in a case of overgrowth syndrome associated with increased nuchal translucency. Prenat Diagn 21:341-345, 2001
131. Hirata GI, Medearis AL, Horenstein J, et al: Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:238-242, 1990
132. Elliott JP, Garite TJ, Freeman RK, et al: Ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 60:159-162, 1982
133. Alsulyman OM, Ouzounian JG, Kjos SL: The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation n diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:503-506, 1997
134. Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD: Sonographically estimated fetal weights: Accurracy and limitations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1118-1121, 1988
135. Field NT, Piper JM, Langer O: The effect of maternal obesity on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. Obstet Gynecol 86:102-107, 1995
136. Hedriana HL, Moore TR: A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1600-1604, 1994; discussion 1604-1606
137. Platek DN, Divon MY, Anyeagbunam A, et al: Intrapartum ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight by the house staff. Am J obstet Gynecol 165:842-845, 1991
138. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL: An evaluation of 2 equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:47-51, 1982
139. Coombs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, et al: Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: Is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia? J Matern Fetal Med 9:55-61, 2000
140. Sokol RJ, Chik L, Dombrowski MP, et al: Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: Improving ultrasonography-based prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1489-1495, 2000
141. Wong SF, Chan FY, Cincotta RB, et al: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: Diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:429-432, 2000
142. Sylvestre G, Divon MY, Onyeije C, et al: Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing. J Matern Fetal Med 9:287-290, 2000
143. Gilby JR, Williams MC, Spellacy WN: Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia. J Reprod Med 45:936-938, 2000
144. Holcomb WL Jr, Mostello DJ, Gray DL: Abdominal circumference vs. estimated weight to predict large for gestational age birth weight in diabetic pregnancy. Clin Imaging 24:1-7, 2000
145. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, et al: Spartanburg Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements. Obstet Gynecol 95:639-642, 2000
146. Winn HN, Holcomb W, Shumway JB, et al: The neonatal bisacromial diameter: A prenatal sonographic evaluation. J Perinat Med 25:484-487, 1997
147. Riska A, Laine H, Voutilainen P, et al: Estimation of fetal shoulder width by measurement of humerospinous distance by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:272-274, 1996
148. Kastler B, Gangi A, Mathelin C, et al: fetal shoulder measurements with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:777-780, 1993
149. Verspyck E, Goffinet F, Hellot M, et al: Newborn shoulder width: A prospective study of 2222 consecutive measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:589-593, 1999
150. Gonen R, Spiegel D, Abend M: Is macrosomia predictable and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable? Obstet Gynecol 88:526-529, 1996
151. Watson WJ, Soisson AP, Harlass FE: Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accurracy of ultrasound vs. clinical examination. J Reprod Med 33:369-371, 1988
152. Raman S, Urquhart R, Yusof M: Clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 32:196-199, 1992
153. Chauhan SP, Lutton PM, Bailey KJ, et al: Intrapartum clinical, sonographic and parous patient's estimation of newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 79:956-958, 1992
154. Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, et al: Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 91:72-77, 1998
155. Sohaey R, Nyberg DA, Sickler GK, et al: Idiopathic polyhydramnios: Association with fetal macrosomia. Radiology 190:393-396, 1994
156. Benson CB, Coughlin BF, Doubilet PM: Amniotic fluid volume in large-for-gestational age fetuses of nondiabetic mothers. J Ultrasound Med 10:149-151, 1991
157. Lazebnik N, Hill LM, Guzick D, et al: Severity of polyhydramnios does not affect the prevalence of large-for-gestational-age newborn infants. J Ultrasound Med 15:385-388, 1996
158. Owen P, Osman I, Farrell T: Is there a relationship between fetal weight and amniotic fluid index? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:61-63, 2002
159. Andres RL, Day MC: Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use. Semin Neonatol 5:231-241, 2000