Operationalizing the psychodynamic diagnostic manual: A preliminary study of the psychodiagnostic chart

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Gordon, Robert M ^a   Stoffey, Ronald W ^b  

^a Kutztown University of Pennsylvania ^*

^b KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; KAROLINSKA PSYCHODYNAMIC PROFILE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY 2; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPERATIONALIZED PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGIST; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MMPI; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896735113     PISSN: 00259284     EISSN: 19432828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/bumc.2014.78.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bornstein, R. F., & Gordon, R. M. (2012). What do practitioners want in a diagnostic taxonomy? Comparing the PDM with DSM and ICD. Division/ Review: A Quarterly Psychoanalytic Forum, (6), 35. http://www.apadivisions.org/division-39/publications/review/2012/12/diagnostictaxonomy.aspx
2. Butcher, J. N., & Williams, C. L. (2009). Personality Assessment with the MMPI-2: Historical roots, international adaptations, and current challenges. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(1), 105-135 .
3. Dahlbender, R. W., Rudolf, G., & OPD Task Force. (2006). Psychic structure and mental functioning: Current research on the reliable measurement and clinical validity of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD) System. In Psychodynamic diagnostic manual (pp. 615-660). Bethesda, MD: Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental & Learning Disorders.
4. Ellison, W. D., & Levy, K. N. (2012). Factor structure of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a nonclinical sample using exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 503-517.
5. Gazzillo, F., Lingiardi, V., & Del Corno, F. (2012). Towards the validation of three assessment instruments derived from the PDM Axis P: The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Prototypes, the Core Preoccupations Questionnaire and the Pathogenic Beliefs Questionnaire. Bollettino di psicologia applicata, 265, 31-45.
6. Gordon, R. M. (2001). MMPI/MMPI-2 changes in long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(1-2), 59-79.
7. Gordon, R. M. (2008). Early reactions to the PDM by psychodynamic, CBT and other psychologists. Psychologist-Psychoanalyst, 46(1), 13.
8. Gordon, R. M. (2009). Reactions to the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM) by Psychodynamic, CBT and other non-psychodynamic psychologists. Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(1), 55-62.
9. Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
10. Koelen, J. A., Luyten, P., Eurelings-Bontekoe, L. H., Diguer, L., Vermote, R., Lowyck, B., & Bühring, M. E. (2012). The impact of level of personality organization on treatment response: A systematic review. Psychiatry, 75(4), 355-374.
11. McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. PDM Task Force. (2006). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual. Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations.Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations
13. Torello, R. (2010). The enterprise of psychiatric diagnosis: A critical review with a focus on the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71(3-B).
14. Weinryb, R. M., Rössel, R. J., & Asberg, M. (1991). The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. I. Validity and dimensionality. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83(1), 64-72.
15. Zimmermann, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Cierpka, M., Schauenburg, H., Doering, S., & Benecke, C. (2012). Assessing the level of structural integration using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 522-532. doi:10.1080/ 00223891.2012.700664.