Investigating the allosteric regulation of YfiN from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Clues from the structure of the catalytic domain

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Giardina, Giorgio ^a   Paiardini, Alessandro ^a   Fernicola, Silvia ^a   Franceschini, Stefano ^a   Rinaldo, Serena ^a   Stelitano, Valentina ^a   Cutruzzolà, Francesca ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANYLATE CYCLASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; YFIN PROTEIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BIS(3',5')-CYCLIC DIGUANYLIC ACID; CYCLIC GMP; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALLOSTERISM; ANIMAL CELL; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM COLONY; BINDING AFFINITY; CATALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME REGULATION; IN VITRO STUDY; LUNG FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CYCLIC GMP; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84896718101     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081324     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Schirmer T, Jenal U (2009) Structural and mechanistic determinants of c-di-GMP signalling. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 724-735. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2203. PubMed: 19756011.
2. Sondermann H, Shikuma NJ, Yildiz FH (2012) You've come a long way: c-di-GMP signaling. Curr Opin Microbiol 15: 140-146. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.12. 008. PubMed: 22226607.
3. Chua SL, Tan SY-Y, Rybtke MT, Chen Y, Rice SA et al. (2013) Bis-(3′-5′)-Cyclic Dimeric GMP Regulates Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 2066-2075. doi:10.1128/AAC.02499-12. PubMed: 23403434.
4. Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M (2013) Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77: 1-52. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00043-12. PubMed: 23471616.
5. Govan JR, Deretic V (1996) Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol Rev 60: 539-574. PubMed: 8840786. (Pubitemid 26303478)
6. Häussler S, Tümmler B, Weissbrodt H, Rohde M, Steinmetz I (1999) Small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Clin Infect Dis 29: 621-625. doi:10.1086/598644. PubMed: 10530458. (Pubitemid 29439964)
7. Häussler S (2003) Highly adherent small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. J Med Microbiol 52: 295-301. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05069-0. PubMed: 12676867.
8. Häussler S (2004) Biofilm formation by the small colony variant phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol 6: 546-551. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00618.x. PubMed: 15142242.
9. Smith EE, Buckley DG, Wu Z, Saenphimmachak C, Hoffman LR et al. (2006) Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 8487-8492. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602138103. PubMed: 16687478. (Pubitemid 43838482)
10. Starkey M, Hickman JH, Ma L, Zhang N, De Long S et al. (2009) Pseudomonas aeruginosa rugose small-colony variants have adaptations that likely promote persistence in the cystic fibrosis lung. J Bacteriol 191: 3492-3503. doi:10.1128/JB.00119-09. PubMed: 19329647.
11. Meissner A, Wild V, Simm R, Rohde M, Erck C et al. (2007) Pseudomonas aeruginosa cupA-encoded fimbriae expression is regulated by a GGDEF and EAL domain-dependent modulation of the intracellular level of cyclic diguanylate. Environ Microbiol 9: 2475-2485. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01366.x. PubMed: 17803773. (Pubitemid 47366660)
12. Rohde M (1999) Small-Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis. Clin Infect Dis 29: 621-625. doi:10.1086/598644. PubMed: 10530458.
13. Drenkard E, Ausubel FM (2002) Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature 416: 740-743. doi:10.1038/416740a. PubMed: 11961556. (Pubitemid 34429150)
14. Malone JG, Jaeger T, Spangler C, Ritz D, Spang A et al. (2010) YfiBNR mediates cyclic di-GMP dependent small colony variant formation and persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000804. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat. 1000804. PubMed: 20300602.
15. Reinhardt A, Köhler T, Wood P, Rohner P, Dumas J-L et al. (2007) Development and persistence of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a longitudinal observation in mechanically ventilated patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 1341-1350. doi:10.1128/AAC.01278-06. PubMed: 17261619. (Pubitemid 46586815)
16. Mulcahy LR, Burns JL, Lory S, Lewis K (2010) Emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains producing high levels of persister cells in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Bacteriol 192: 6191-6199. doi:10.1128/JB.01651-09. PubMed: 20935098.
17. Kulasakara H, Lee V, Brencic A, Liberati N, Urbach J et al. (2006) Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases reveals a role for bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic-GMP in virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2839-2844. doi:10.1073/pnas.0511090103. PubMed: 16477007.
18. Ueda A, Wood TK (2010) Tyrosine Phosphatase TpbA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Controls Extracellular DNA via Cyclic Diguanylic Acid Concentrations. Environ Microbiol 2: 449-455. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00171.x. PubMed: 21552365.
19. McDonald MJ, Gehrig SM, Meintjes PL, Zhang X-X, Rainey PB (2009) Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. IV. Genetic constraints guide evolutionary trajectories in a parallel adaptive radiation. Genetics 183: 1041-1053. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.107110. PubMed: 19704015.
20. Malone JG, Jaeger T, Manfredi P, Dötsch A, Blanka A et al. (2012) The YfiBNR Signal Transduction Mechanism Reveals Novel Targets for the Evolution of Persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis Airways. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002760. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002760. PubMed: 22719254.
21. Irie Y, Borlee BR, O'Connor JR, Hill PJ, Harwood CS et al. (2012) Self-produced exopolysaccharide is a signal that stimulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 20632-20636. doi:10.1073/pnas.1217993109. PubMed: 23175784.
22. Giardina G, Castiglione N, Caruso M, Cutruzzolà F, Rinaldo S (2011) The Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNR transcription factor: light and shade of nitric oxide-sensing mechanisms. Biochem Soc Trans 39: 294-298. doi:10.1042/BST0390294. PubMed: 21265791.
23. Stelitano V, Brandt A, Fernicola S, Franceschini S, Giardina G et al. (2013) Probing the activity of diguanylate cyclases and c-di-GMP phosphodiesterases in real-time by CD spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 41: e79. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt028. PubMed: 23358823.
24. Navarro MV, Newell PD, Krasteva PV, Chatterjee D, Madden DR, et al. (2011) Structural basis for c-di-GMP-mediated inside-out signaling controlling periplasmic proteolysis. PLoS Biol 9: e1000588. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 1000588.
25. Kelley La, Sternberg MJE (2009) Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 4: 363-371. doi:10.1038/nprot. 2009.2. PubMed: 19247286.
26. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Söding J (2009) Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 77 Suppl 9: 128-132. doi:10.1002/prot.22499. PubMed: 19626712.
27. Chan C, Paul R, Samoray D, Amiot NC, Giese B et al. (2004) Structural basis of activity and allosteric control of diguanylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 17084-17089. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406134101. PubMed: 15569936. (Pubitemid 39627778)
28. Wassmann P, Chan C, Paul R, Beck A, Heerklotz H et al. (2007) Structure of BeF3- -modified response regulator PleD: implications for diguanylate cyclase activation, catalysis, and feedback inhibition. Structure 15: 915-927. doi:10.1016/j.str.2007.06.016. PubMed: 17697997. (Pubitemid 47212753)
29. De N, Navarro MVAS, Raghavan RV, Sondermann H (2009) Determinants for the activation and autoinhibition of the diguanylate cyclase response regulator WspR. J Mol Biol 393: 619-633. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.030. PubMed: 19695263.
30. De N, Pirruccello M, Krasteva PV, Bae N, Raghavan RV (2008) Phosphorylation-Independent Regulation of the Diguanylate Cyclase WspR. PLoS Biol 6: 601-617. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060067. PubMed: 18366254.
31. Yang C-Y, Chin K-H, Chuah ML-C, Liang Z-X, Wang AH-J et al. (2011) The structure and inhibition of a GGDEF diguanylate cyclase complexed with (c-di-GMP) 2 at the active site. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67: 997-1008. doi:10.1107/S090744491104039X.
32. Vorobiev SM, Neely H, Yu B, Seetharaman J, Xiao R et al. (2012) Crystal structure of a catalytically active GG(D/E)EF diguanylate cyclase domain from Marinobacter aquaeolei with bound c-di-GMP product. J Struct Funct Genomics 13: 177-183. doi:10.1007/s10969-012-9136-4. PubMed: 22843345.
33. Whitney JC, Colvin KM, Marmont LS, Robinson H, Parsek MR et al. (2012) Structure of the cytoplasmic region of PelD, a degenerate diguanylate cyclase receptor that regulates exopolysaccharide production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem, 287: 23582-93. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.375378. PubMed: 22605337.
34. Ko J, Ryu K-S, Kim H, Shin J-S, Lee J-O et al. (2010) Structure of PP4397 reveals the molecular basis for different c-di-GMP binding modes by Pilz domain proteins. J Mol Biol 398: 97-110. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.007. PubMed: 20226196.
35. Rooman M, Liévin J, Buisine E, Wintjens R (2002) Cation-π/H-bond Stair Motifs at Protein-DNA. Interfaces - J Mol Biol 319: 67-76. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00263-2. (Pubitemid 34729487)
36. Sathyapriya R, Vishveshwara S (2004) Interaction of DNA with clusters of amino acids in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 4109-4118. doi:10.1093/nar/ gkh733. PubMed: 15302912. (Pubitemid 39232283)
37. Hulko M, Berndt F, Gruber M, Linder JU, Truffault V et al. (2006) The HAMP domain structure implies helix rotation in transmembrane signaling. Cell 126: 929-940. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.058. PubMed: 16959572. (Pubitemid 44310780)
38. Newell PD, Monds RD, Toole GAO (2009) LapD is a bis-(3′,5′)- cyclic dimeric GMP-binding protein that regulates surface attachment by Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0 - 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 3461-3466. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808933106. PubMed: 19218451.
39. Airola MV, Sukomon N, Samanta D, Borbat PP, Freed JH et al. (2013) HAMP Domain Conformers That Propagate Opposite Signals in Bacterial Chemoreceptors. PLoS Biol 11: e1001479. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001479. PubMed: 23424282.
40. Reinelt S, Hofmann E, Gerharz T, Bott M, Madden DR (2003) The structure of the periplasmic ligand-binding domain of the sensor kinase CitA reveals the first extracellular PAS domain. J Biol Chem 278: 39189-39196. doi:10.1074/jbc.M305864200. PubMed: 12867417. (Pubitemid 37221822)
41. Maslennikov I, Klammt C, Hwang E, Kefala G, Okamura M et al. (2010) Membrane domain structures of three classes of histidine kinase receptors by cell-free expression and rapid NMR analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 10902-10907. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001656107. PubMed: 20498088.
42. Haliloglu T, Bahar I, Erman B (1997) Gaussian Dynamics of Folded. Proteins - Phys Rev Lett 79: 3090-3093. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3090.
43. Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O et al. (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 80: 505-515. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76033-X. PubMed: 11159421.
44. Schuck P (2000) Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J 78: 1606-1619. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0. PubMed: 10692345.
45. Kabsch W (1993) Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J Appl Crystallogr 26: 795-800. doi:10.1107/S0021889893005588.
46. Vagin A, Teplyakov A (2010) Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 22-25. doi:10.1107/S0907444909042589. PubMed: 20057045.
47. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60: 2126-2132. doi:10.1107/S0907444904019158. PubMed: 15572765. (Pubitemid 41742764)
48. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53: 240-255. doi:10.1107/S0907444996012255. PubMed: 15299926. (Pubitemid 27235885)
49. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallography 26: 283-291. doi:10.1107/S0021889892009944.
50. Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ et al. (2007) MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W375-W383. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm216. PubMed: 17452350.
51. Chi CN, Haq SR, Rinaldo S, Dogan J, Cutruzzolà F et al. (2012) Interactions outside the boundaries of the canonical binding groove of a PDZ domain influence ligand binding. Biochemistry 51: 8971-8979. doi:10.1021/bi300792h. PubMed: 23046383.
52. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. PubMed: 9254694. (Pubitemid 27359211)
53. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680. doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. PubMed: 7984417. (Pubitemid 24354800)
54. King RD, Saqi M, Sayle R, Sternberg MJ (1997) DSC: public domain protein secondary structure predication. Comput Appl Biosci 13: 473-474. PubMed: 9283763. (Pubitemid 27384632)
55. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R (1994) PHD--an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Comput Appl Biosci 10: 53-60. PubMed: 8193956. (Pubitemid 24066811)
56. Jones DT (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 292: 195-202. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091. PubMed: 10493868.
57. Sali A, Potterton L, Yuan F, van Vlijmen H, Karplus M (1995) Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER. Proteins 23: 318-326. doi:10.1002/prot.340230306. PubMed: 8710825.
58. Lomize MA, Lomize AL, Pogozheva ID, Mosberg HI (2006) OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database. Bioinformatics 22: 623-625. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btk023. PubMed: 16397007. (Pubitemid 43372827)
59. Sippl MJ (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362. doi:10.1002/prot.340170404. PubMed: 8108378.
60. Emekli U, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R, Haliloglu T (2008) HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures. Proteins 70: 1219-1227. doi:10.1002/prot.21613. PubMed: 17847101. (Pubitemid 351304082)
61. Paiardini A, Bossa F, Pascarella S (2005) CAMPO, SCR-FIND and CHC-FIND: a suite of web tools for computational structural biology. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W50-W55. doi:10.1093/nar/gki416. PubMed: 15980521.