Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: The role of expectations fulfilment

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Palazzo, Clémence ^a   Jourdan, Claire ^b   Descamps, Stéphane ^c   Nizard, Rémi ^d   Hamadouche, Moussa ^a   Anract, Philippe ^a   Boisgard, Stéphane ^c   Galvin, Myriam ^c   Ravaud, Philippe ^e   Poiraudeau, Serge ^a  

^a Université Paris Descartes ^*  (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^c SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

^d HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^e HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

Author keywords

Expectations; Expectations' fulfilment; Outcome; Satisfaction; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SHORT FORM 12; SURGEON; TERTIARY CARE CENTER;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ODDS RATIO; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896699772     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-53     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, et al. Lancet 2012 380 9859 2163 96 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 23245607
2. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011 19 11 1270 85 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009 21907813
3. Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Picavet HS, Hazes JM, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 7 644 50 10.1136/ard.62.7.644 12810427
4. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Woolf A, Pfleger B, Bull World Health Organ 2003 81 9 646 56 14710506
5. Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model. Higashi H, Barendregt JJ, PLoS One 2011 6 9 25403 10.1371/journal.pone.0025403 21966520
6. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement. A five-year follow-up. Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007 89 7 868 73 17673577
7. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Nilsdotter AK, Petersson IF, Roos EM, Lohmander LS, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 10 923 30 10.1136/ard.62.10.923 12972468
8. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME, Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007 33 1 71 86 10.1016/j.rdc.2006.12.008 17367693
9. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M, J Arthroplasty 2011 26 2 209 13 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013 20462736
10. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 4 780 5 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 17403800
11. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Mannion AF, Kampfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I, Arthritis Res Ther 2009 11 5 139 10.1186/ar2811 19772556
12. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006 452 35 43 16967035
13. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 9 2073 8 10.2106/JBJS.H.01802 19723982
14. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson JA, Malchau H, Garellick G, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009 91 2 157 61 19190046
15. Does pre-operative psychological distress affect patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty? Hossain M, Parfitt DJ, Beard DJ, Darrah C, Nolan J, Murray DW, Andrew G, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011 12 122 10.1186/1471-2474-12-122 21631923
16. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME, J Arthroplasty 1997 12 4 387 96 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90194-7 9195314
17. Systematic review: do patient expectations influence treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty? Haanstra TM, van den Berg T, Ostelo RW, Poolman RW, Jansma EP, Cuijpers P, de Vet HC, et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012 10 152 10.1186/1477-7525-10-152 23245187
18. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN, et al. J Rheumatol 2002 29 6 1273 9 12064846
19. Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty. Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed N, J Arthroplasty 2009 24 5 716 21 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.016 18701241
20. Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Marcinkowski K, Wong VG, Dignam D, Orthop Nurs 2005 24 3 202 9 15928530
21. The measurement of patient satisfaction. Carr-Hill RA, J Public Health Med 1992 14 3 236 49 1419201
22. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Scott CE, Bugler KE, Clement ND, Macdonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012 94 7 974 81 22733956
23. Comparison of patient and surgeon expectations of total hip arthroplasty. Jourdan C, Poiraudeau S, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, et al. PLoS One 2012 7 1 30195 10.1371/journal.pone. 0030195 22272303
24. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA, J Arthroplasty 2003 18 7 872 8 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00276-6 14566742
25. Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Sculco TP, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 2 424 31 10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z 18196427
26. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M, Spine 2000 25 3186 91 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 11124735
27. Andrews F, Withey S, Social indicators of well-being: American's perceptions of life quality New York: Plenum Press 1976
28. Using patients' and rheumatologists' opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale. Tubach F, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Dougados M, Bellamy N, Ravaud P, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64 1 75 9 10.1136/ard.2003.019539 15608303
29. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW, J Rheumatol 1988 15 12 1833 40 3068365
30. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD, Med Care 1996 34 3 220 33 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 8628042
31. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: but why should we use it? Kiebzak GM, Campbell M, Mauerhan DR, Am J Manag Care 2002 8 5 463 74 12019598
32. Barton K, Package "MuMin". Version 1.9.18 Available on: http://mumin.r-forge.r-project.org/MuMIn-manual.pdf (date: 2014/02/06)
33. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M, Semin Arthritis Rheum 2012 41 4 576 88 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.003 22035624
34. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B, Lancet 2012 380 9836 37 43 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 22579043
35. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002 84-A 11 1942 8 12429753
36. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, McCarthy BD, Ward RE, Health Serv Res 1996 31 5 623 38 8943994
37. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Bélisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1999 42 8 1722 28 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722::AID-ANR22>3.0. CO;2-R 10446873
38. Discordance between patient and surgeon satisfaction after total joint arthroplasty. Harris IA, Harris AM, Naylor JM, Adie S, Mittal R, Dao AT, J Arthroplasty 2013 28 5 722 7 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.044 23462496
39. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient's perspective. Hawker GA, Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006 18 5 526 30 16896295
40. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR, J Clin Epidemiol 1995 48 12 1503 10 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 8543964