Augmented real-time navigation with critical structure proximity alerts for endoscopic skull base surgery

Laryngoscope

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 853-859

  Dixon, Benjamin J ^a,b   Daly, Michael J ^c   Chan, Harley ^c   Vescan, Allan ^d   Witterick, Ian J ^a,d,e   Irish, Jonathan C ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e Mount Sinai Hospital ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

endoscopic surgery; Image guided surgery; pituitary surgery; skull base surgery; surgical navigation; virtual endoscopy

Indexed keywords

CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EXERCISE; FRUSTRATION; HUMAN; LOCALIZED INTRAOPERATIVE VIRTUAL ENDOSCOPY IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TASK LOAD INDEX; OPERATING ROOM; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SKULL SURGERY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; IMAGE-GUIDED SURGERY; PITUITARY SURGERY; SKULL BASE SURGERY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION; VIRTUAL ENDOSCOPY;

CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL BASE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84896546073     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24385     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M,. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267: 649-663.
2. Schlosser RJ, Bolger WE,. Image-guided procedures of the skull base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005; 38: 483-490.
3. Kockro RA, Tsai YT, Ng I, et al. Dex-ray: augmented reality neurosurgical navigation with a handheld video probe. Neurosurgery 2009; 65: 795-807; discussion 807-808.
4. Sanderson PM, Watson MO, Russell WJ,. Advanced patient monitoring displays: tools for continuous informing. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 161-168, table of contents.
5. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M, Mutter D, Soler L,. Augmented-reality- assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA 2004; 292: 2214-2215.
6. Kawamata T, Iseki H, Shibasaki T, Hori T,. Endoscopic augmented reality navigation system for endonasal transsphenoidal surgery to treat pituitary tumors: technical note. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 1393-1397.
7. Daly MJ, Chan H, Prisman E, et al. Fusion of intraoperative cone-beam CT and endoscopic video for image-guided procedures. Proc SPIE 2010; 7625: 762503.
8. Cleary K, Peters TM,. Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2010; 12: 119-142.
9. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 1116-1128.
10. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Burch S, et al. Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys 2005; 32: 241-254.
11. Nithiananthan S, Brock KK, Daly MJ, Chan H, Irish JC, Siewerdsen JH,. Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: convergence and accuracy. Med Phys 2009; 36: 4755-4764.
12. Hart SG, Staveland LE,. Development of NASA-TLX: Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1987.
13. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H, Vescan A, Witterick IJ, Irish JC,. Augmented image guidance improves skull base navigation and reduces task workload in trainees: a preclinical trial. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 2060-2064.
14. Nakamura M, Stover T, Rodt T, et al. Neuronavigational guidance in craniofacial approaches for large (para)nasal tumors involving the anterior skull base and upper clival lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 666-672.
15. Strauss G, Koulechov K, Rottger S, et al. Evaluation of a navigation system for ENT with surgical efficiency criteria. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 564-572.
16. Ukimura O, Gill IS,. Image-fusion, augmented reality, and predictive surgical navigation. Urol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 115-123, vii.
17. Volonte F, Pugin F, Bucher P, Sugimoto M, Ratib O, Morel P,. Augmented reality and image overlay navigation with OsiriX in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: not only a matter of fashion. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18: 506-509.
18. Livingston MA,. Evaluating human factors in augmented reality systems. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2005; 25: 6-9.
19. Regenbrecht H, Baratoff G, Wilke W,. Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2005; 25: 48-56.
20. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB,. Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2005; 12: 80-90.
21. Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D,. Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul Healthc 2010; 5: 267-271.
22. Donmez B, Boyle LN, Lee JD,. Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback. Accid Anal Prev 2008; 40: 776-786.
23. Donmez B, Boyle LN, Lee JD,. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2007; 39: 581-590.
24. Wickens CD, Goh J, Helleberg J, Horrey WJ, Talleur DA,. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Hum Factors 2003; 45: 360-380.
25. Nakamura K, Naya Y, Zenbutsu S, et al. Surgical navigation using three-dimensional computed tomography images fused intraoperatively with live video. J Endourol 2010; 24: 521-524.
26. Edworthy J, Hellier E,. Alarms and human behaviour: implications for medical alarms. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 12-17.
27. Donmez B, Boyle LN, Lee JD,. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance. Hum Factors 2006; 48: 785-804.
28. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, Irish JC,. Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 454-461.