Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 33, Issue , 2014, Pages 12-18

  Mayer, Richard E ^a   Estrella, Gabriel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotional design; Motivation; Multimedia learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896536193     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P.W., Cruikshank K.A., Mayer R.E., Pintrich P.R., et al. Ataxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives 2001, Longman, New York.
2. Brunken R., Plass J.L., Moreno R. Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. Cognitive load theory 2010, 253-272. Cambridge University Press, New York. J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, R. Brunken (Eds.).
3. Crowder R.G., Wagner R.K. The psychology of reading 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Garner R., Gillingham M., White C. Effects of seductive details on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction 1989, 6:41-57. 10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2.
5. Harp S.F., Mayer R.E. The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997, 89:92-102. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92.
6. Harp S.F., Mayer R.E. How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:414-434. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414.
7. Magner U.I.E., Schwonke R., Aleven V., Popescu O., Renkl A. Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction 2014, 29:141-152. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002.
8. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
9. Mayer R.E. Applying the science of learning 2011, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
10. Mayer R.E. Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 2014, 29:171-173. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003.
11. Mayer R.E., Griffith E., Naftaly I., Rothman D. Increased interestingness of extraneous details leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2008, 14:329-339. 10.1037/a0013835.
12. Mayer R.E., Heiser H., Lonn S. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93:187-198. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187.
13. Moreno R. Optimising learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:765-781. 10.1002/acp.1348.
14. Moreno R., Mayer R.E. Interactive multimdodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review 2007, 19:309-326. 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2.
15. Norman D.A. Emotional design 2004, Basic Books, New York.
16. Plass J.L., Heidig S., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D., Um E. Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction 2014, 29:128-140. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006.
17. Scientific research in education 2002, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. R.J. Shavelson, L. Towne (Eds.).
18. Sung E., Mayer R.E. When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior 2012, 28:1618-1625. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026.
19. Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 19-30. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
20. Sweller J., Ayres P., Kalyuga S. Cognitive load theory 2011, Springer, New York.
21. Um E., Plass J.L., Hayward E.O., Homer B.D. Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104:485-498. 10.1037/a0026609.