Quantitative comparison of sinc-approximating kernels for medical image interpolation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1679, Issue , 1999, Pages 210-218

  Meijering, Erik H W ^a   Niessen, Wiro J ^a   Pluim, Josien P W ^a   Viergever, Max A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; CUBIC CONVOLUTION; GEOMETRICAL TRANSFORMATION; IMAGE PROCESSING ALGORITHM; INTERPOLATION KERNELS; LINEAR INTERPOLATION; MEDICAL IMAGE INTERPOLATIONS; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84896532915     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10704282_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. J. P. W. Pluim, J. B. A. Maintz, & M. A. Viergever, “Interpolation artefacts in mutual information based image registration”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1999. In Press.
2. J. L. Ostuni, A. K. S. Santha, V. S. Mattay, D. R. Weinberger, R. L. Levin, & J. A. Frank, “Analysis of interpolation effects in the reslicing of functional MR images”, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 803–810, 1997.
3. S. Schreiner, C. B. Paschal, & R. L. Galloway, “Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images”, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 1996.
4. E. H. W. Meijering, K. J. Zuiderveld, & M. A. Viergever, “Image reconstruction by convolution with symmetrical piecewise nth-order polynomial kernels”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 192–201, 1999.
5. G. Wolberg, Digital Image Warping, IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, USA, 1990.
6. F. J. Harris, “On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 51–83, 1978.
7. G. J. Grevera & J. K. Udupa, “An objective comparison of 3-D image interpolation methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 642–652, 1998.
8. J. A. Parker, R. V. Kenyon, & D. E. Troxel, “Comparison of interpolatingmethods for image resampling”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 1983.
9. S. K. Park & R. A. Schowengerdt, “Image reconstruction by parametric cubic convolution”, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 258–272, 1983.
10. E. Maeland, “On the comparison of interpolation methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 213–217, 1988.
11. R. G. Keys, “Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1153–1160, 1981.