Agricultural trade disputes in the WTO

Frontiers of Economics and Globalization

Volumn 6, Issue , 2009, Pages 245-282

  Josling, Tim ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural trade conflicts; Trade litigation; WTO trade disputes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896496195     PISSN: 15748715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1574-8715(2009)0000006013     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Barichello, R., Josling, T., Sumner, D. (2005), Agricultural Trade Disputes Between Canada and the United States: Costly but Diminishing, Commentary, No. 224, December, CD Howe Institute, Toronto.
2. Barton, J.H., Goldstein, J., Josling, T., Steinberg, R.H. (2006), The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law and Economics of the GATT and WTO. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Josling, T. (2003), Bananas and the WTO: testing the new dispute settlement process. In: Josling, T.E., Taylor, T.G. (Eds.), Banana Wars: The Anatomy of a Trade Dispute. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 169-194.
4. Josling, T. (2005), Unraveling the cotton case. Bridges. Year 9, No. 4, April-May, pp. 3-5.
5. Josling, T. (2006), The War on Terroir: geographical indications as a transatlantic trade conflict. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (3), 337-366.
6. Josling, T., Tangermann, S. (2003), Production and export subsidies in agriculture: lessons from GATT and WTO disputes involving the US and the EC. In: Petersmann, E-U., Pollack, M. (Eds.), Transatlantic Economic Disputes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Josling, T., Roberts, D., Orden, D. (2004), Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
8. Josling, T., Tangermann, S., Warley, T.K. (1996), Agriculture in the GATT. Houndmills, London and New York.
9. Josling, T., Zhao, L., Carcelen, J., Arha, K. (2006), Implications of WTO litigation for the WTO agricultural negotiations. IPC Policy Brief.
10. Kramer, C.S. (1989), Food safety and International Trade: the US-EC Meat and Hormone Controversies. In: Kramer, C.S. (Ed.), The Political Economy of US Agriculture. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp. 210-211.
11. O'Connor, B. (2004), The Law of Geographical Indications. Cameron May, London.
12. Steinberg, R.H., Josling, T.E. (2003), When the peace ends: The vulnerability of EC and U.S. agricultural subsidies to WTO legal challenge. Journal of International Economic Law 6 (2), 369-417.
13. World Trade Organization. (1995), The results of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations, The Legal Texts, WTO, Geneva.
14. World Trade Organization. (1997a), European Communities-regime for the importation, sale and distribution of bananas, complaint by the United Sates, Report of the Panel, WT/DS27/R/USA, May 22, 1997.
15. World Trade Organization. (1997b), European Communities-regime for the importation, sale and distribution of bananas, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS27/AB/R, September 9.
16. World Trade Organization. (1998), EC - measures concerning meat and meat products (hormones), WTO/DS26 & 48/AB/R, February 13.
17. World Trade Organization. (1999), Canada - measures affecting the importation of milk and the exportation of dairy products, WT/DS103/ R and WT/DS113/R.
18. World Trade Organization. (2001), Canada - measures affecting the importation of milk and the exportation of dairy products, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS103&113/AB/RW.
19. World Trade Organization. (2004a), European Communities - export subsidies on sugar, Reports of the Panels, WT/DS265/R, WT/DS266/R, & WT/DS283/R.
20. World Trade Organization. (2004b), United States - subsidies on Upland cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R.
21. World Trade Organization. (2005), United States - subsidies on Upland cotton, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/ AB/R, & WT/DS267/AB/R.