Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 491-493

  Dal Ré, Rafael ^a   Caplan, Arthur L ^b  

^a Clinical Research Program   (Spain)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Editors; Interventions; Outcome reporting bias; Peer review; Publication; Results

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AUTHOR; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EDITOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME REPORTING BIAS; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REGISTER; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896487400     PISSN: 00316970     EISSN: 14321041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-013-1635-0     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. World Medical Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index. html Accessed 23 October 2013
2. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P (2009) Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 302:977-984
3. Huic M, Marusic M, Marusic A (2011) Completeness and changes in registered data and reporting bias of randomized controlled trials in ICMJE journals after trial registration policy. PLoS ONE 6:e25258
4. Hannick G, Gooszen HG, Rovers MM (2013) Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical intervention. Ann Surg 257:818-823
5. Dwan K, Altman DG, Cresswell L, Blundell M, Gamble CL, Williamson PR (2011) Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, MR000031
6. Smyth RMD, Kirkham JJ, Jacoby A, Altman DG, Gamble C, Williamson PR (2011) Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists. BMJ 341:c7153
7. Al-Marzouki S, Roberts I, Evans S, Marshall T (2008) Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet 372:201 (Pubitemid 351978096)
8. Wieseler B, Kerekes MF, Vervoelgyi V, McGauran N, Kaiser T (2012) Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications. BMJ 344:d8141
9. Doshi P, Jefferson T (2013) The first 2 years of the European medicines Agency's policy on access to documents: secret no longer. JAMA Intern Med 173:380-382
10. Eichler HG, Pétavy F, Pignatelli F, Rasi G (2013) Access to patient-level trial data - a boon to drug developers. N Engl J Med 369: 1577-1579
11. Turner EH, Knoepflmacher D, Shapley L (2012) Publication bias in antipsychotic trials: an analysis of efficacy comparing the published literature to the US food and drug administration database. PLoSMed 9:e1001189
12. Godlee F (2012) Clinical trial data for all drugs in current use. Must be made available for independent scrutiny. BMJ 345:e7304
13. Nisen P, Rockhold F (2013) Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials. N Engl J Med 369:475-478
14. Doshi P, Dickersin K, Healy D, Vedula SS, Jefferson T (2013) Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings. BMJ 346:f2865
15. Laine C, Guallar E, Mulrow C et al (2013) Closing in on the truth about recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: evidence synthesis, data sharing, peer review and reproducible research. Ann Intern Med 158:916-918
16. Immune Tolerance Network (ITN) (2013) TrialShare home page. https://www.itntrialshare.org. Accessed 23 October 2013
17. Dal-Ré R (2011) Worldwide clinical interventional studies on leading causes of death: a descriptive analysis. Ann Epidemiol 21:727-731
18. van de Wetering FT, Scholten RJPM, Haring T, Clarke M, Hooft L (2012) Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications. PLoS ONE 7:e49599
19. Mathieu S, Chan A-W, Ravaud P (2013) Use of trial register information during the peer review process. PLoS ONE 8:e59910
20. World Health Organization (2013) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/ Accessed 23 October 2013
21. Moja LP, Moschetti I, Nurbhai M et al (2009) Compliance of clinical trial registries with the world health organizationminimum data set: a survey. Trials 10:56
22. COPE-Committee on publication ethics (2011) Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. March 2011. http://publicationethics. org/resources/code-conduct Accessed 23 October 2013