Integrated DEM-CFD modeling of the contact charging of pneumatically conveyed powders

Powder Technology

Volumn 258, Issue , 2014, Pages 144-156

  Korevaar, M W ^a   Padding, J T ^a   Van der Hoef, M A ^b   Kuipers, J A M ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CFD; Contact charging; DEM; Electrostatic interactions; Tribo electric charging

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COULOMB INTERACTIONS; ELECTROSTATICS; POWDERS;

CHARGING EFFICIENCY; CONTACT CHARGING; DEM; PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS; PARTICLE DYNAMICS; PARTICLE-WALL INTERACTIONS; TANGENTIAL COMPONENTS; TRIBOELECTRIC CHARGING;

DUCTS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDER; SIMULATION; STATIC ELECTRICITY; VELOCITY;

EID: 84896456275     PISSN: 00325910     EISSN: 1873328X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Giffin A., Mehrani P. Effect of gas relative humidity on reactor wall fouling generated due to bed electrification in gas-solid fluidized beds. Powder Technol. 2013, 235:368-375.
2. Bailey A.G. Charging of solids and powders. J. Electrost. 1993, 30:167-180.
3. Mayr M.B., Barringer S.A. Corona compared with triboelectric charging for electrostatic powder coating. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71(4):E171-E177.
4. Higashiyama Y., Asano K. Recent progress in electrostatic separation technology. Part. Sci. Technol. 1998, 16(1):77-90.
5. Dascalescu L., Morar R., Iuga A., Samuila A., Mihailescu M. Electrostatic technologies for the recycling of non-ferrous metals and plastics from wastes. NATO Science Series 1999, vol. 63:77-87. Springer, Netherlands, (chapter). I.I. Inculet, F. Tanasescu, R. Cramariuc (Eds.).
6. Wu G., Li J., Xu Z. Triboelectrostatic separation for granular plastic waste recycling: a review. Waste Manag. 2013, 33(3):585-597.
7. Matsusaka S., Maruyama H., Matsuyama T., Ghadiri M. Triboelectric charging of powders: a review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65(22):5781-5807.
8. Tanoue K.-I., Tanaka H., Kitano H., Masuda H. Numerical simulation of tribo-electrification of particles in a gas-solids two-phase flow. Powder Technol. 2001, 118(1-2):121129.
9. Harper W.R. The Volta effect as a cause of static electrification. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1951, 205(1080):83.
10. Watano S. Mechanism and control of electrification in pneumatic conveying of powders. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61(7):2271-2278.
11. Elghobashi S. Particle-laden turbulent flows: direct simulation and closure models. Appl. Sci. Res. 1991, 48(3):301-314.
12. Masui Noriaki, Murata Yuji Electrification of polymer particles by impact on a metal plate. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1983, 22(Part 1, No. 6):1057-1062.
13. Hogue M.D., Calle C.I., Weitzman P.S., Curry D.R. Calculating the trajectories of triboelectrically charged particles using discrete element modeling (DEM). J. Electrost. 2008, 66(1):32-38.
14. Hogue M.D., Calle C.I., Curry D.R., Weitzman P.S. Discrete element modeling (DEM) of triboelectrically charged particles: revised experiments. J. Electrost. 2009, 67(4):691-694.
15. Matsuyama Tatsushi, Šupuk E., Ahmadian H., Hassanpour A., Ghadiri M. Analysis of tribo-electric charging of spherical beads using distinct element method 2009, 1145:27-130.
16. Watanabe H., Samimi A., Ding Y.L., Ghadiri M., Matsuyama T., Pitt K.G. Measurement of charge transfer due to single particle impact. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2006, 23(2):133-137.
17. Greason W.D. Investigation of a test methodology for triboelectrification. J. Electrost. 2000, 49(3-4):245-256.
18. Peterson J.W. Contact charging between nonconductors and metal. J. Appl. Phys. 1954, 25(7):907-915.
19. Matsuyama T., Yamamoto H. Charge relaxation process dominates contact charging of a particle in atmospheric conditions. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 1995, 28:2418.
20. Matsuyama T., Yamamoto H. Characterizing the electrostatic charging of polymer particles by impact charging experiments. Adv. Powder Technol. 1995, 6(3):211-220.
21. Ireland P.M. Triboelectrification of particulate flows on surfaces: part II - mechanisms and models. Powder Technol. 2010, 198(2):199-210.
22. Ireland P.M. Dynamic particle-surface tribocharging: the role of shape and contact mode. J. Electrost. 2012, 70(6):524-531.
23. Van der Hoef M.A., Ye M., van Sint Annaland M., Andrews A.T., Sundaresan S., Kuipers J.A.M. Multiscale modeling of gas-fluidized beds. Adv. Chem. Eng. 2006, 31:65-149.
24. Van der Hoef M.A., van Sint Annaland M., Deen N.G., Kuipers J.A.M. Numerical simulation of dense gas-solid fluidized beds: a multiscale modeling strategy. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2008, 40:47-70.
25. Anderson T.B., Jackson Roy Fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds. Equations of motion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1967, 6(4):527-539.
26. Wen C., Yu Y.H. Mechanics of Fluidization. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. 1966, vol. 62.
27. Cundall P.A., Strack O.D.L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 1979, 29(1):47-65.
28. Pumplin J. Application of Sommerfeld-Watson transformation to an electrostatics problem. Am. J. Phys. 1969, 37:737.
29. Johnson K.L. Contact Mechanics 1987, Cambridge University Press.