Responsiveness of the VISA-P scale for patellar tendinopathy in athletes

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 453-457

  Hernandez Sanchez, Sergio ^a   Hidalgo, Ma Dolores ^b   Gomez, Antonia ^b  

^a MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDER; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE INJURY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLA LIGAMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPORT; SPORTS PHYSIOTHERAPY; TENDINITIS; TENDON;

KNEE INJURIES; SPORTS PHYSIOTHERAPY; TENDONS;

ADULT; CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATELLAR LIGAMENT; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPORTS; TENDINOPATHY;

EID: 84896402902     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: 14730480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091163     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Lian OB, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevalence of jumper's knee among elite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:561-7.
2. Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, et al. Prospective imaging study of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy in elite junior basketball players. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:473-9.
3. Liang MH, Lew R, Stucki G, et al. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-orientated questionnaires. Med Care 2002;40:45-51.
4. Bent N, Wright C, Rushton A, et al. Selecting outcome measures in sports medicine. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:1006-12.
5. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, et al. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA 1999;282:1157-62.
6. Visentini PJ, Khan KM, Cook JL, et al. The VISA score: an index of severity of symptoms in patients with jumper's knee (patellar tendinosis). J Sci Med Sport 1998;1:22-8.
7. Kountouris A, Cook J. Rehabilitation of Achilles and patellar tendinopathies. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007;21:295-316.
8. Frohm A, Saartok T, Edman G, et al. Psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the VISA-P outcome score for patellar tendinopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:49.
9. Maffulli N, Longo G, Testa V, et al. VISA-P score for patellar tendinopathy in males: adaptation to Italian. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:162-4.
10. Zwerver J, Kramer T, van der Akker-Scheek I. Validity and reliability of the Dutch translation of VISA-P questionnaire for patellar tendinopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:102.
11. Lohrer H, Nauck T. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the VISA-P questionnaire for German-speaking patients with patellar tendinopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:180-90.
12. Hernandez-Sanchez S, Hidalgo MD, Gomez A. Cross-cultural adaptation of VISA-P score for patellar tendinopathy in Spanish population. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:581-91.
13. de Vet H, Terwee C, Ostelo R, et al. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:54.
14. van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Hayden J, et al. Statistical significance versus clinical importance. Spine 2007;32:1785-90.
15. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 1996;76:359-65.
16. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
17. Khan KM, Visentini PJ, Kiss ZS, et al. Correlation of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging with clinical outcome after patellar tenotomy: prospective and retrospective studies. Clin J Sport Med 1999;9:129-37.
18. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009;17:163-70.
19. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-15.
20. Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, et al. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2006;11:46-53.
21. Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, et al. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:32-9.
22. Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, et al. Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement. Phys Ther 2011;91:675-88.
23. Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of test and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006;86:735-43.
24. van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2006;31:578-82.
25. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, et al. Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:524-34.
26. Beaton D. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 2000;25:3192-9.
27. Stratford PW. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can 2004;56:27-30.
28. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, et al. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 2000;88:287-94.
29. Copay A, Subach B, Glassman S, et al. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 2007;7: 541-6.
30. Metz C. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol 2006;3:413-22.
31. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12(Suppl 4):142-58.
32. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:102-9.
33. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, et al. Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:43.
34. Lehman L, Velozo C. Ability to detect change in patient function: resposiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther 2010;23:361-71.
35. Crosby RD, Kolotkin R, Williams G. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:395-407.
36. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:869-79.
37. Turner D, Schunemann HJ, Griffith LE, et al. Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:374-9.