Prehospital telemedicine electrocardiogram triage for a regional public emergency medical service: Is it worth it? A preliminary cost analysis

Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 140-145

  Brunetti, Natale Daniele ^a   Dellegrottaglie, Giulia ^b   Lopriore, Claudio ^b   Di Giuseppe, Giuseppe ^b   De Gennaro, Luisa ^a   Lanzone, Saverio ^c   Di Biase, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^b Cardio on line Europe Srl   (Italy)

^c DI VENERE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CONSULTATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TELEMEDICINE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; ITALY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS; TELEMETRY; TRIAGE;

EID: 84896402190     PISSN: 01609289     EISSN: 19328737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22234     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee; Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123: 933-944.
2. Roehrig C, Miller G, Lake C, et al. National health spending by medical condition, 1996-2005. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28: w358-w367.
3. Chernew ME, Hirth RA, Cutler DM,. Increased spending on health care: long-term implications for the nation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28: 1253-1255.
4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD.stat extracts. http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx. Accessed August 25, 2013.
5. Bodenheimer T, Fernandez A,. High and rising health care costs. Part 4: can costs be controlled while preserving quality? Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143: 26-31.
6. US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group. National health expenditures. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and- Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/tables.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.
7. Nuti S, Vainieri M, Frey M,. Healthcare resources and expenditure in financial crisis: scenarios and managerial strategies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 (suppl 4): 48-51.
8. Stanton MW,. Reducing Costs in the Health Care System: Learning From What Has Been Done. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2002. AHRQ publication 02-0046. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/costsria.
9. Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Nwaise IA, et al. The economic burden of chronic cardiovascular disease for major insurers. Health Promot Pract. 2007; 8: 234-242.
10. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 121: e46-e215.
11. Cohen JW, Krauss NA,. Spending and service use among people with the fifteen most costly medical conditions, 1997. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22: 129-138.
12. Braunschweig F, Cowie MR, Auricchio A,. What are the costs of heart failure? Europace. 2011; 13 (suppl 2): ii13-ii7.
13. Tarride JE, Lim M, DesMeules M, et al. A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25: e195-e202.
14. Selvarajah S, Haniff J, Kaur G, et al. Identification of effective screening strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention in a developing country: using cardiovascular risk-estimation and risk-reduction tools for policy recommendations. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013; 13: 10.
15. American Medical Association. Getting the Most for Our Health Care Dollars: Strategies to Address Rising Health Care Costs. http://www.ama-assn. org/resources/doc/health-care-costs/strategies-rising-costs.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.
16. Kahn R, Robertson RM, Smith R, et al. The impact of prevention on reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008; 118: 576-585.
17. De Smedt D, Kotseva K, De Bacquer D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of optimizing prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: the EUROASPIRE III health economics project. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 2865-2872.
18. Mistry H., Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare: changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare. 2012; 18: 1-6.
19. Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, et al. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ. 2002; 324: 1434-1437.
20. Curtis JP, Portnay EL, Wang Y, et al; National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000-2002: findings from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1544-1552.
21. Brunetti ND, De Gennaro L, Dellegrottaglie G, et al. A regional prehospital electrocardiogram network with a single telecardiology "hub" for public emergency medical service: technical requirements, logistics, manpower, and preliminary results. Telemed J E Health. 2011; 17: 727-733.
22. Brunetti ND, De Gennaro L, Amodio G, et al. Telecardiology improves quality of diagnosis and reduces delay to treatment in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and atypical presentation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010; 17: 615-620.
23. Brunetti ND, Amodio G, De Gennaro L, et al. Telecardiology applied to a region-wide public emergency health-care service. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009; 28: 23-30.
24. Jollis JG, Roettig ML, Aluko AO, et al. Reperfusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction in North Carolina Emergency Departments (RACE) Investigators. Implementation of a statewide system for coronary reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007; 298: 2371-2380.
25. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Califf RM, et al. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 1418-1424.
26. Chan AW, Kornder J, Elliott H, et al. Improved survival associated with pre-hospital triage strategy in a large regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction program. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 1239-1246.
27. Brunetti ND, De Gennaro L, Pellegrino PL, et al. Atrial fibrillation with symptoms other than palpitations: incremental diagnostic sensitivity with at-home tele-cardiology assessment for emergency medical service. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19: 306-313.
28. Leshem-Rubinow E, Berger M, Shacham J, et al. New real-time loop recorder diagnosis of symptomatic arrhythmia via telemedicine. Clin Cardiol. 2011; 34: 420-425.
29. Brunetti ND, De Gennaro L, Dellegrottaglie G, et al. Prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias in pre-hospital tele-cardiology electrocardiograms of emergency medical service patients referred for syncope. J Electrocardiol. 2012; 45: 727-732.
30. Louis AA, Turner T, Gretton M, et al. A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003; 5: 583-590.
31. Sørensen JT, Terkelsen CJ, Nørgaard BL, et al. Urban and rural implementation of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 430-436.
32. Sillesen M, Sejersten M, Strange S, et al. Referral of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction directly to the catheterization suite based on prehospital teletransmission of 12-lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol. 2008; 41: 49-53.
33. Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL, et al. Reduction of treatment delay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: impact of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral to primary percutanous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 770-777.
34. Sejersten M, Sillesen M, Hansen PR, et al. Effect on treatment delay of prehospital teletransmission of 12-lead electrocardiogram to a cardiologist for immediate triage and direct referral of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101: 941-946.
35. Carstensen S, Nelson GC, Hansen PS, et al. Field triage to primary angioplasty combined with emergency department bypass reduces treatment delays and is associated with improved outcome. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 2313-2319.
36. Sivagangabalan G, Ong AT, Narayan A, et al. Effect of prehospital triage on revascularization times, left ventricular function, and survival in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103: 907-912.
37. Pedersen SH, Galatius S, Hansen PR, et al. Field triage reduces treatment delay and improves long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 2296-2302.
38. Hutchison AW, Malaiapan Y, Jarvie I, et al. Prehospital 12-lead ECG to triage ST-elevation myocardial infarction and emergency department activation of the infarct team significantly improves door-to-balloon times: ambulance Victoria and MonashHEART Acute Myocardial Infarction (MonAMI) 12-lead ECG project. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 528-534.
39. Dieker HJ, Liem SS, El Aidi H, et al. Pre-hospital triage for primary angioplasty: direct referral to the intervention center versus interhospital transport. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3: 705-711.
40. Ortolani P, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, et al. Usefulness of prehospital triage in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 100: 787-792.
41. Fosbol EL, Granger CB, Jollis JG, et al. The impact of a statewide pre-hospital STEMI strategy to bypass hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention capability on treatment times. Circulation. 2013; 127: 604-612.
42. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 2569-2619.
43. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 writing group to review new evidence and update the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, writing on behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee. Circulation. 2008; 117: 296-329.
44. Garvey JL, MacLeod BA, Sopko G, et al; for the National Heart Attack Alert Program (NHAAP) Coordinating Committee; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); National Institutes of Health. Pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiography programs: a call for implementation by emergency medical services systems providing advanced life support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 485-491.
45. Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Chen AY, et al. Utilization and impact of prehospital electrocardiograms for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53: 161-166.
46. Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6: 18-26.
47. Jerant AF, Azari R, Nesbitt TS,. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care. 2001; 39: 1234-1245.
48. Roth A, Korb H, Gadot R, et al. Telecardiology for patients with acute or chronic cardiac complaints: the "SHL" experience in Israel and Germany. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 75: 643-645.
49. Kildemoes HW, Kristiansen IS,. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the thrombolytic delay for acute myocardial infarction. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004; 20: 368-374.
50. Smith B, Hughes-Cromwick PF, Forkner E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telephonic disease management in heart failure. Am J Manag Care. 2008; 14: 106-115.
51. Clarke M, Shah A, Sharma U,. Systematic review of studies on telemonitoring of patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17: 7-14.
52. Hailey D., The need for cost-effectiveness studies in telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11: 379-383.
53. Cardio On Line Europe. Report on emergency tele-cardiology in the Apulia region of Italy, 2004-2013. http://www.cardioonlineeurope.com/pagina.php?news=1. Accessed August 25, 2013.