A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1642-1653

  Hauk, Olaf ^a   Stenroos, Matti ^a,b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Beamforming; Cross talk function; Inverse problem; Leakage; Maximum likelihood estimation; Minimum norm estimation; Spatial filter

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84896392592     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: 10970193     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22279     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aster CA, Borchers B, Thurber CH (2011):Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems, 2 ed.Academic Press, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
2. Backus GE, Gilbert JF (1968): The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys J R Astron Soc 16:169-205.
3. Barnes GR, Furlong PL, Singh KD, Hillebrand A (2006): A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 31:623-626.
4. Bertero M, De Mol C, Pike ER (1985): Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: General formulation and singular system analysis. Inverse Problems 1:301-330.
5. Bertero M, De Mol C, Pike ER (1988): Linear inverse problems with discrete data: II. Stability and regularisation. Inverse Problems 4:573-594.
6. Brookes MJ, Vrba J, Robinson SE, Stevenson CM, Peters AM, Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, Morris PG. (2008): Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging. Neuroimage 39:1788-1802.
7. Dalal SS, Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS (2006): Modified beamformers for coherent source region supression. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:1357-1363.
8. Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, Lewine JD, et al. (2000): Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26:55-67.
9. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kohler T, Wischmann HA (1999): Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J Clin Neurophysiol 16:267-295.
10. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, Kohler T, Theissen A, Drenckhahn R, et al. (1998): Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 107:93-111.
11. Grave de Peralta-Menendez R, Gonzalez-Andino SL (1998): A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:440-448.
12. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino S (1998): Distributed source models: Standard solutions and new developments. In: Uhl C, editor. Analysis of Neurophysiological Brain Functioning. Heidelberg:Springer Verlag. pp.176-201.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Hauk O, Gonzalez Andino S, Vogt H, Michel C (1997): Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Hum Brain Mapp 5:454-467.
14. Grave De Peralta Menendez R, Hauk O, Gonzalez S (2009): The neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem and the Zero Dipole Localization Error. Comput Intelligence Neurosci, Article ID 659247.
15. Gross J, Ioannides AA (1999): Linear transformations of data space in MEG. Phys Med Biol 44:2081-2097.
16. Hämäläinen MS, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV (1993): Magnetoencephalography-Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65:413-497.
17. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ (1984): Interpreting Measured Magnetic Fields of the Brain: Minimum Norm Estimates of Current Distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
18. Hauk O (2004): Keep it simple: A case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 21:1612-1621.
19. Hauk O, Wakeman DG, Henson R (2011): Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics. Neuroimage 54:1966-1974.
20. Imada T (2010): A method for MEG data that obtains linearly-constrained minimum-variance beamformer solution by minimum-norm least-squares method. Paper presented at the Biomag 2010-17th International Conference on Biomagnetism, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
21. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999): Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194-208.
22. Lin FH, Witzel T, Ahlfors SP, Stufflebeam SM, Belliveau JW, Hamalainen MS (2006): Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 31:160-171.
23. Liu AK, Dale AM, Belliveau JW (2002): Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum Brain Mapp 16:47-62.
24. Lütkenhöner B (1998): Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation I. Theory and simulations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106:314-321.
25. Menke W (1989):Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. San Diego:Academic Press, Inc.
26. Michalareas G, Schoffelen JM, Paterson G, Gross J(2012): Investigating causality between interacting brain areas with multivariate autoregressive models of MEG sensor data. Hum Brain Mapp (in press).
27. Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L. Grave De Peralta R (2004): EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2195-2222.
28. Mohseni HR, Kringelbach ML, Probert Smith P, Green AL, Parsons CE, Young KS, et al. (2010): Application of a null-beamformer to source localisation in MEG data of deep brain stimulation. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 4120-4123.
29. Molins A, Stufflebeam SM, Brown EN, Hämäläinen MS (2008): Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. Neuroimage 42:1069-1077.
30. Mosher JC, Baillet S, Leahy RM (2003): Equivalence of linear approaches in bioelectromagnetic inverse solutions. Paper presented at the IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 28 Sep to 1 Oct 2003, St. Louis, Missouri, 294-297.
31. Pascual-Marqui RD (2002): Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24(Suppl D):5-12.
32. Popescu M, Popescu E-A, Chan T, Blunt SD, Lewine JD (2008): Spatio-temporal reconstruction of bilateral auditory steady-state responses using MEG beamformers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1092-1102.
33. Sarvas J (1987): Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32:11-22.
34. Scherg M (1994): From EEG source localization to source imaging. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 152:29-30.
35. Schoffelen JM, Gross J (2009): Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum Brain Mapp 30:1857-1865.
36. Sekihara K, Sahani M, Nagarajan SS (2005): Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 25:1056-1067.
37. Taulu S, Simola J (2006): Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys Med Biol 51:1759-1768.
38. Van Veen BD, van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A (1997): Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:867-880.
39. Wipf D, Nagarajan S (2009): A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging. Neuroimage 44:947-966.