Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 10-22

  Cozzani, Valerio ^a   Antonioni, Giacomo ^a   Landucci, Gabriele ^b   Tugnoli, Alessandro ^a   Bonvicini, Sarah ^a   Spadoni, Gigliola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Domino effect; Land use planning; Major accident hazard; NaTech; Quantitative risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CHEMICAL HAZARDS; HAZARDS; LAND USE; PROBABILITY; RISK PERCEPTION;

DOMINO EFFECTS; LAND USE PLANNING; MAJOR-ACCIDENT HAZARDS; NATECH; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84896373093     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abdolhamidzadeh B., Abbasi T., Rashtchian D., Abbasi S.A. Domino effect in process-industry accidents - an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24(5):575-593.
2. Antonioni G., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Development of a frame work for the risk assessment of Na-tech accidental events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009, 94:1442-1450.
3. Antonioni G., Cozzani V., Gubinelli G., Spadoni G., Zanelli S. The estimation of vulnerability in domino accidental events. Proceedings of the European conference on safety and reliability 2004, 3653-3658. Springer, London.
4. Antonioni G., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Amethodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 147:48-59.
5. Antonioni G., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22(5):614-624.
6. Bartolozzi V., Bajardi S., Vasile F., Marino S. Safety integrated area analysis: a recent case study. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2010, 19:457-462.
7. Bellezza F., Contini S., Binda, Spadoni G. AGIS based software tool for risk assessment and management in industrial areas. Proceedings of ESREL 98 conference 1998, Trondheim.
8. Campedel M., Cozzani V., Garcia-Agreda A., Salzano E. Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1231.
9. Center for Chemical Process Safety Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2000, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York. 2nd ed.
10. Cozzani V., Antonioni G., Spadoni G. Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19(5):463-477.
11. Cozzani V., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G., Zanelli S. Hazmat transport: a methodological framework for the risk analysis of marshalling yards. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2007, 147(1-2):412-423.
12. Cozzani V., Campedel M., Renni E., Krausmann E. Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 175:501-509.
13. Cozzani V., Gubinelli G., Antonioni G., Spadoni G., Zanelli S. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2005, 127(1-3):14-30.
14. Cozzani V., Gubinelli G., Salzano E. Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. Journal of Hazardous Material 2006, 129(1-3):1-21.
15. Cozzani V., Salzano E. The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure: part I. Probit models. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004, 107(3):67-80.
16. Egidi D., Foraboschi F.P., Spadoni G., Amendola A. The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1995, 49(1):75-89.
17. Foraboschi F.P. Rischio d'area e gestione del territorio. Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries 8-12 May 1992, Taormina.
18. Forni M., Martelli A., Poggianti A., Spadoni A., Pugliese B., Sano A., et al. Studies performed in Italy for seismic isolation of chemical plant components. Proceedings of the 2000 ASME pressure vessels and piping conference 2000.
19. Godoy S.M., Santa Cruz A.S.M., Scenna N.J. STRRAP system-a software for hazardous materials risk assessment and safe distances calculation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2007, 92(7):847-857.
20. Gubinelli G., Cozzani V. Assessment of missile hazard: reference fragmentation patterns of process equipment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 163:1008-1018.
21. Gubinelli G., Cozzani V. The assessment of missile hazard: evaluation of fragment number and drag factors. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 161:439-449.
22. Gubinelli G., Zanelli S., Cozzani V. Asimplified model for the assessment of the impact probability of fragments. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004, 116:175-187.
23. Health and Safety Executive, HSE Canvey: An investigation of potential hazards from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area 1978, HM Stationery Office, London.
24. Health and Safety Executive, HSE Canvey: A second report. A review of the potential hazards from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area three years after publication of the Canvey report 1981, HM Stationery Office, London.
25. Khan F.I., Abbasi S.A. The world's worst industrial accident of the 1990s - what happened and what might have been: a quantitative study. Process Safety Progress 1999, 18(3):135-145.
26. Krausmann E., Cozzani V., Salzano E., Renni E. Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2011, 11:921-929.
27. Krausmann E., Cruz A.M. Natech disasters: when natural hazards trigger technological accidents. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:139-263.
28. Krausmann E., Renni E., Campedel M., Cozzani V. Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Natural Hazards 2011, 59:285-300.
29. Landucci G., Antonioni G., Tugnoli A., Cozzani V. Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for atmospheric storage tanks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2012, 106:200-216.
30. Landucci G., Gubinelli G., Antonioni G., Cozzani V. The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41(6):1206-1215.
31. Landucci G., Molag M., Cozzani V. Modeling the performance of coated LPG tanks engulfed in fires. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 172(1):447-456.
32. Luria P., Aspinall P.A. Evaluating a multi-criteria model for hazard assessment in urban design. The Porto Marghera case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2003, 23(5):625-653.
33. Mannan S. Lees' loss prevention in the process industries 2005, Elsevier, Oxford (UK). 3rd ed.
34. Milazzo M.F., Lisi R., Maschio G., Antonioni G., Spadoni G. Astudy of land transport of dangerous substances in Eastern Sicily. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(3):393-403.
35. Milazzo M.F., Ancione G., Basco A., Lister D.G., Salzano E., Maschio G. Potential loading damage to industrial storage tanks due to volcanic ash fallout. Natural Hazards 2013, 66:939-953.
36. Morra P., Lisi R., Spadoni G., Maschio G. The assessment of human health impact caused by industrial and civil activities in the Pace Valley of Messina. Science of The Total Environment 2009, 407(12):3712-3720.
37. Necci A., Antonioni G., Cozzani V., Krausmann E., Borghetti A., Nucci C.A. Amodel for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2013, 115:91-99.
38. Paltrinieri N., Landucci G., Molag M., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Risk reduction in road and rail LPG transportation by passive fire protection. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 167(1-3):332-344.
39. Pasman H., Reniers G. Past, present and future of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from land-use planning (LUP). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2013, 28:2-9.
40. Petrova E.G., Krausmann E. From natural hazards to technological disasters. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2011, 11:3063-3065.
41. Reniers G., Cozzani V. Domino effects in the process industries 2013, Elsevier, Oxford (UK).
42. ©: user-friendly software for planning domino effects prevention. Safety Science 2007, 45(10):1060-1081.
43. Reniers G., Dullaert W., Audenaert A., Alec B.J.M., Soudan K. Managing domino effect-related security of industrial areas. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2008, 21(3):336-343.
44. Renni E., Cozzani V., Antonioni A., Krausmann E., Cruz A.M. Assessment of major accidents triggered by lightning. Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference 2009, 959-965. Taylor & Francis, London.
45. Renni E., Krausmann E., Cozzani V. Industrial accidents triggered by lightning. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 184:42-48.
46. Rijnmond Public Authority Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study 1982, Reidel, Dordrecht (NL).
47. Salzano E., Cozzani V. The analysis of domino accidents triggered by vapor cloud explosions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005, 90:271-284.
48. Salzano E., Cozzani V. Afuzzy set analysis to estimate loss intensity following blast wave interaction with process equipment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry 2006, 19:343-352.
49. Salzano E., Garcia-Agreda A., Di Carluccio A., Fabbrocino G. Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009, 94:1577.
50. Salzano E., Iervolino I., Fabbrocino G. Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2003, 16:403.
51. Spadoni G., Egidi D., Contini S. Through ARIPAR-GIS the quantified area risk analysis supports land-use planning activities. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2000, 71(1-3):423-437.
52. Spadoni G., Contini S., Uguccioni G. The new version of ARIPAR and the benefits given in assessing and managing major risks in industrialised areas. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2003, 81(1):19-30.
53. Spagli L., Ceccanti M., Mossa Verre M. Valutazione del rischio di area. Applicazione sperimentale del codice VARIAR alla zona di Piombino. Proceedings of the VGR 2006 Valutazione e Gestione del Rischio negli Insediamenti Civili ed Industriali 2006, Available at. http://conference.ing.unipi.it/vgr2006/archivio/Archivio/2000/Session2/093.pdf.
54. Uguccioni G., Bellocchi C., Spadoni G. Il programma ARIPAR per la valutazione del rischio d'area: applicazione all'area industriale di Livorno. Proceedings of VGR 2006 Valutazione e Gestione del Rischio negli Insediamenti Civili ed Industriali 2006, Available at. http://conference.ing.unipi.it/vgr2006/archivio/Archivio/2000/Session2/097.pdf.
55. Uijt de Haag P.A.M., Ale B.J.M. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment 1999, (Purple book), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague (NL).
56. Young S., Balluz L., Malilay J. Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Science of the Total Environment 2004, 322:3-20.