Influence of standardized activities on validity of assessment of capacity for myoelectric control

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1391-1400

  Linder, Helen Y N ^a   Eliasson, Ann Christin ^b   Hermansson, Liselotte M N ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activities; Amputation; Assessment; Bimanual; Instrument validation; Myoelectric control; Prostheses; Rehabilitation; Upper limb; Upper limb reduction deficiency

Indexed keywords

HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PROSTHETICS; RESEARCH;

ACTIVITIES; AMPUTATION; ASSESSMENT; BIMANUAL; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; UPPER LIMBS;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS;

ADULT; AGED; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC LIMB PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INFANT; LEISURE; MALE; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; SUGGESTION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HAND; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896351017     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0231     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hermansson LM, Fisher AG, Bernspång B, Eliasson AC. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: A new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(3):166-71. [PMID:16040474] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970410024280
2. Hermansson LM, Hill W, Lindner HY. Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control version 2.0 training manual. Örebro (Sweden): Örebro University Hospital; 2011.
3. Lindner HY, Linacre JM, Norling Hermansson LM. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: Evaluation of construct and rating scale. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(6): 467-74. [PMID:19479160] http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0361
4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): AERA Publications; 1999.
5. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1759-64. [PMID:18675393] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.046
6. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1442-46. [PMID:20801265] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.025
7. Stubblefield KA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Kuiken TA. Occupational therapy protocol for amputees with targeted muscle reinnervation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(4):481-88. [PMID:19882483] http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2008.10.0138
8. Weeks DL, Wallace SA, Anderson DI. Training with an upper-limb prosthetic simulator to enhance transfer of skill across limbs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(3):437-43. [PMID:12638114] http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50014
9. Chien CW, Brown T, McDonald R. Rasch analysis of the assessment of children's hand skills in children with and without disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(1):253-61. [PMID:21041063] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.022
10. Merritt BK, Fisher AG. Gender differences in the performance of activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12):1872-77. [PMID:14669197] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00483-0
11. Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, Kotnik S, Giordano A. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(5):393-99. [PMID:18461266] http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0183
12. Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1997;22(1):73-76. [PMID:9061532] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80023-X
13. Jang CH, Yang HS, Yang HE, Lee SY, Kwon JW, Yun BD, Choi JY, Kim SN, Jeong HW. A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(6):907-21. [PMID:22506221] http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.907
14. Hermansson LM, Bodin L, Eliasson AC. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(2):118-23. [PMID:16546769] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970500312222
15. Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London (UK): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1999.
16. Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005;330(7495):843.
17. Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23(6):662-74. [PMID:12505244] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00242-8
18. Taves DR. The use of minimization in clinical trials. Con-temp Clin Trials. 2010;31(2):180-84. [PMID:20060500] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2009.12.005
19. Linacre JM, Wright BD. Construction of measures from many-facet data. J Appl Meas. 2002;3(4):484-512.
20. Eckes T. Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement: Analyzing and evaluating rater-mediated assessments: New York (NY): Peter Lang Publishing Group; 2011.
21. Linacre JM. A user's guide to FACETs-Rasch-model computer programs. [place unknown]: John M. Linacre; 2012.
22. Tristan A. An adjustment for sample size in DIF analysis. Rasch Measure Trans. 2006;20(3):1070-71.
23. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):776-83. [PMID:12048655] http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32737
24. Resnik L, Adams L, Borgia M, Delikat J, Disla R, Ebner C, Walters LS. Development and evaluation of the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees. Arch Phys Med Reha-bil. 2013;94(3):488-94.
25. Bagley AM, Molitor F, Wagner LV, Tomhave W, James MA. The Unilateral Below Elbow Test: A function test for children with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):569-75. [PMID:16780626] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206001204
26. Sanderson E, Scott R. UNB test of prosthetic function: a test for unilateral amputees (test manual). Fredericton (Canada): University of New Brunswick; 1985.
27. Bryden PJ, Roy EA. A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: Performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain Cogn. 2005;58(3):258-68. [PMID:15963376] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.004
28. Gordon HW, Kravetz S. The influence of gender, handed-ness, and performance level on specialized cognitive functioning. Brain Cogn. 1991;15(1):37-61. [PMID:2009173] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(91)90014-Y
29. Korkmaz M, Erbahçeci F, Ulger O, Topuz S. Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(4): 262-68. [PMID:22951757] http://dx.doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2012.2631
30. Huizing K, Reinders-Messelink H, Maathuis C, Hadders-Algra M, van der Sluis CK. Age at first prosthetic fitting and later functional outcome in children and young adults with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency: A cross-sectional study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(2):166-74. [PMID:20298129] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03093640903584993
31. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(1):60-63. [PMID:14660200] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001645094