L'uso di Internet nei trial clinici

Clinica Terapeutica

Volumn 165, Issue 1 SUPPL, 2014, Pages

  Refolo, P ^a   Sacchini, D ^a   Minacori, R ^a   Spagnolo, A G ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical research; E recruitment; Informed consent; Recruitment

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 84896284424     PISSN: 00099074     EISSN: 19726007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7417/CT.2014.1678     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Nuttall A. Considerations For Improving Patient Recruitment Into Clinical Trials. 2012 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.rdpclinical.com/pdfs/RDP_Recruitment_Whitepaper_23Mar12.pdf).
2. Pierre C. Recruitment and ReteRetention in clinical trials: What works, what doesn't and why. Presented at:2006 Drug Information Association Annual Summit; June 2006; Philadelphia, PA.
3. Kitterman DR, Cheng SK, Dilts DM, et al. The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center. Acad Med 2011;86:1334-5.
4. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2006;7:9.
5. Accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.centerwatch.com/.
6. Hess J. Accelerating clinical trials: Budgets, patient recruitment, and productivity. Cutting Edge Information. Research Report 2004 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.AcceleratedClinicalTrials.com).
7. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, et al. How evidence-based are recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Family Practice 2003;20:83-92.
8. Getz K. The Gift of Partecipation: A Guide to Making Informed Decisions About Volunteering for a Clinical Trial. Bar Harbor, Jerian Publishing, 2007.
9. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Clinical trials submitted in marketing-authorisation applications to the European Medicines Agency. Overview of patient recruitment and the geographical location of investigator sites. EMA/INS/GCP/676319/2012.
10. Accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/it/content/l%E2%80%99ema-pubblica-un-rapporto-sul-reclutamento-dei-pazienti-e-la-localizzazione-geografica-degl.
11. Glickman SW, McHutchison JG, Peterson ED, et al. Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalizationof Clinical Research. New Egl J Med 2009;360(8):816-23.
12. Ballantyne AJ. How to Do Research Failry in an Unjust World. Am J Bioethics 2010;10(6):26-35.
13. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, et al. What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research. J Infect Diseases 2004;189:930-7.
14. Verheggen FWSM, Nieman F, et al. Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial. Patient Educ Couns 1998;35:111-25.
15. Lowton K. Motivations in Clinical Research: Why do people participate? 2007 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.cfww.org/pub/english/cfwnl/10/273/Motivations_in_Clinical_ Research_Why_do_people_participate).
16. ECRI Health Technology Assessment Information Service. Patients' Reasons for Participation in Clinical Trials and. Effect of Trial Participation on Patient Outcomes. 2002 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: https://www.ecri.org/Documents/ Clinical_Trials_Patient_Guide_Evidence_ Report.pdf).
17. Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, et al. Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol 2003;13:2589-96.
18. Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2013;7;3(2) doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360.
19. Watson JM, Torgerson DJ. Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:34.
20. Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:MR000013.
21. Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, et al. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med 2010;7(11) doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368.
22. Trevena L, Irwig L, Barratt A. Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial. J Med Ethics 2006;32:473-7.
23. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ICT Facts and Figures;2013 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2013.pdf).
24. Hamilton RJ, Bowers BJ. Internet Recruitment and E-Mail Interviews in Qualitative Studies Qualitative Health Research 2006;6:821-35.
25. Bifulco L, Bobbio L, Cremaschi M, et al. Il futuro delle politiche pubbliche. Milano, Bruno Mondadori Editore, 2006.
26. Frawley H, Whitburn L, Daly J, et al. E-recruitment: the future for clinical trials in a digital world. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2011;30(6):811-12.
27. O'Connor H, Madge C. Cyber-Parents and Cyber-Research: Exploring the Internet as a Medium for Research. ESRC Research Methods Programme Working Paper N. 9, Manchester: The University of Manchester;2001 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/documents/WorkingPaper9.pdf).
28. Franklin K, Lowry C. Computer-mediated focus group sessions: naturalistic inquiry in a networked environment. Qualitative Research 2001;8(2):169-84.
29. Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, London, Sage, 2000.
30. Holmes S. Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46(3):394-405.
31. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Measuring the Information Society. 2012 (accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/ Documents/publications/ mis2012/MIS2012_without_Annex _4.pdf).
32. Accesso del 15.04.2013, a: http://www.Internetworldstats.com/.
33. Ehrenberger HE. The e-recruitment of participants for clinical trials. IRB 2003;25(4):16-7.
34. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Step 5 (CPMP/ICH/135/95) (accesso del 12.07.2013 a: http://ichgcp.net/).
35. Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International Guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva, 2002.
36. International Conference on Harmonisation. Guideline for GCP. GCP Journal 1996 (Supplement);3(4):S1-S27.
37. Marchetti D, Spagnolo A, Cicerone M, et al. Research Ethics Committee Auditing: The Experience of a University Hospital. HEC Forum 2013;1-12 doi:10.1007/s10730-013-9210-8.
38. Refolo P, Minacori R, Mele V, et al. ?? ? Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): the significance of using humanistic measures in clinical trial and clinical practice. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2012;16:1319-23.
39. Minacori R, Sacchini D, Cicerone M, et al. Insurance and clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2012;33(4):573.
40. Refolo P, Mele V, Minacori R, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO): Historical profile, definitions, classifications and problems. Clinica Terapeutica 2012;163(1):39-45.
41. Spagnolo AG. Hemodialysis and the birth of bioethics committees. Giornale italiano di nefrologia: organo ufficiale della Società italiana di nefrologia. 2010;27(6):559-60.
42. Sacchini D, Pennacchini M. Observational protocol. Clinica Terapeutica 2010;161(4):401-2.
43. Sacchini D, Pennacchini M. Informed consent. Clinica Terapeutica 2010;161(4):397-9.
44. Sacchini D, Pennacchini M. Ethics committees. Clinica Terapeutica 2010;161(3):281-3.
45. Berto D, Peroni M, Milleri S, et al. Evaluation of the readability of information sheets for healthy volunteers in phase-I trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000;56(5):371-4.
46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Inspector General. Clinical Trial Web Site: A Promising Tool to Foster Informed Consent. Washington, D.C., United States Publisher, 2002.
47. Sacchini D, Refolo P, Virdis A, et al. Electronic Medical Diary (EMD): ethical analysis in a HTA process. In: D'Atri A, Saccà D. Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies. Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag GmbH & Co, 2009.