Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: Why patients enter a clinical trial

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 111-125

  Verheggen, Frank W S M ^a   Nieman, Fred ^a   Jonkers, Ruud ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Health Belief Model; Informed consent procedure; Patient beliefs; Patient compliance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL STUDY; EXPECTATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MODEL; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLUNTEER;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0032189568     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00060-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Quaid K., Faden R., Vining E.et al. Informed consent for a prescription drug: Impact of disclosed information on patient understanding and medical outcomes. Pat Educ Couns. 15:1990;249-259.
2. Mazur D. Why the goals of informed consent are not realized. J Gen Int Med. 3:1988;370-380.
3. Simel D., Feussner J. A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats'. J Clin Epidem. 44:1991;771-777.
4. Meisel A., Roth L. What do and do we not know about informed consent. JAMA. 246:1981;2437-2477.
5. Gotay C. Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literature. Soc Sci Med. 33:1991;569-577.
6. Lauver D. A theory of care seeking behavior. J Nurs Schol. 24:1992;281-287.
7. Gillam S. Understanding the uptake of cervical cancer screening: The contribution of the health belief model. Brit J Gen Pract. 41:1991;510-513.
8. Morrow G., Hickok J., Burish T. Behavioral aspects of clinical trials. An integrated framework from behavioral theory. Cancer (suppl.). 74:1994;2676-2682.
9. Wallston K, Wallston B. Health locus of control scales. In: Lefcourt H (ed.), Research with the Locus of Control Construct, Vol 1, Assessment Methods. New York: Academic Press, 1981:189-243.
10. Marshall G., Collins G., Crooks V. A comparison of the multidimensional health locus of control. J Pers Assess. 54:1990;181-190.
11. Westerlaak J, Kropman J, Collaris J. Beroepenklapper (Dutch instrument for social economic classes). Instituut voor Toegepaste Sociologie. Nijmegen, 1975.
12. Asher H. Causal Modeling. Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1983.
13. Janz N., Becker M. The Health Belief Model: A decade later. H Educ Quart. 11:1984;1-47.
14. Kasl S., Cobb S. Health behavior, illness behavior and sick role behavior. Arch Environ H. 12:1966;246-266.
15. Verheggen F., Jonkers R., Kok G. Patients's perceptions of informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. Pat Educ Counsel. 29:1996;137-153.
16. Verheggen F., van Wijmen F. Myth and reality of informed consent in clinical trials. Med Law. 1:1997;53-71.