Adaptive gain control during human perceptual choice

Neuron

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1429-1441

  Cheadle, Samuel ^a   Wyart, Valentin ^b   Tsetsos, Konstantinos ^a   Myers, Nicholas ^a   deGardelle, Vincent ^c   HerceCastañón, Santiago ^a   Summerfield, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE GAIN CONTROL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPILLOMETRY; SIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; NEUROIMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL BIAS; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; NEUROIMAGING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84896262004     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. J.Comp. Neurol. 2005, 493:99-110.
2. Barlow H. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Sensory Communication 1961, MIT Press, Cambridge. W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.).
3. Bartlett N.R. Dark and light adaptation. Vision and Visual Perception 1965, John Wiley and Sons, New York. C.H. Graham (Ed.).
4. Beck J.M., Ma W.J., Kiani R., Hanks T., Churchland A.K., Roitman J., Shadlen M.N., Latham P.E., Pouget A. Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making. Neuron 2008, 60:1142-1152.
5. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol. Rev. 2006, 113:700-765.
6. Bonnasse-Gahot L., Nadal J.P. Neural coding of categories: information efficiency and optimal population codes. J.Comput. Neurosci. 2008, 25:169-187.
7. Boorman E.D., Behrens T.E., Woolrich M.W., Rushworth M.F. How green is the grass on the other side? Frontopolar cortex and the evidence in favor of alternative courses of action. Neuron 2009, 62:733-743.
8. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
9. Carandini M., Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 1997, 276:949-952.
10. Carandini M., Heeger D.J. Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:51-62.
11. Cohen J.D., Aston-Jones G. Cognitive neuroscience: decision amid uncertainty. Nature 2005, 436:471-472.
12. de Gardelle V., Summerfield C. Robust averaging during perceptual judgment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:13341-13346.
13. de Lange F.P., van Gaal S., Lamme V.A., Dehaene S. How awareness changes the relative weights of evidence during human decision-making. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001203.
14. Deneve S. Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6:75.
15. Drugowitsch J., Moreno-Bote R., Churchland A.K., Shadlen M.N., Pouget A. The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:3612-3628.
16. Eldar E., Cohen J.D., Niv Y. The effects of neural gain on attention and learning. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:1146-1153.
17. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
18. Fairhall A.L., Lewen G.D., Bialek W., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412:787-792.
19. Feldman N.H., Griffiths T.L., Morgan J.L. The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 116:752-782.
20. Filimon F., Philiastides M.G., Nelson J.D., Kloosterman N.A., Heekeren H.R. How embodied is perceptual decision making? Evidence for separate processing of perceptual and motor decisions. J.Neurosci. 2013, 33:2121-2136.
21. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:815-836.
22. Gilzenrat M.S., Holmes B.D., Rajkowski J., Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance. Neural Netw. 2002, 15:647-663.
23. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:10-16.
24. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:535-574.
25. Greenlee M.W., Heitger F. The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Res. 1988, 28:791-797.
26. Grinband J., Hirsch J., Ferrera V.P. A neural representation of categorization uncertainty in the human brain. Neuron 2006, 49:757-763.
27. Heeger D.J. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 1992, 9:181-197.
28. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Ungerleider L.G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:467-479.
29. Ho T.C., Brown S., Serences J.T. Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:8675-8687.
30. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1982, Cambridge University Press, New York.
31. Kok P., Jehee J.F., de Lange F.P. Less is more: expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron 2012, 75:265-270.
32. Liu T., Pleskac T.J. Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. J.Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:2383-2398.
33. Louie K., Glimcher P.W. Efficient coding and the neural representation of value. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2012, 1251:13-32.
34. Louie K., Khaw M.W., Glimcher P.W. Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:6139-6144.
35. Ma W.J., Beck J.M., Latham P.E., Pouget A. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1432-1438.
36. Naka K.I., Rushton W.A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J.Physiol. 1966, 185:536-555.
37. Nassar M.R., Rumsey K.M., Wilson R.C., Parikh K., Heasly B., Gold J.I. Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1040-1046.
38. Nickerson R.S. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1998, 2:175-220.
39. Ossmy O., Moran R., Pfeffer T., Tsetsos K., Usher M., Donner T.H. The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:981-986.
40. Padoa-Schioppa C. Range-adapting representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:14004-14014.
41. Peirce C.S. The probability of induction. Popular Science Monthly 1878, 12:705-718.
42. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:437-442.
43. Poldrack R.A., Clark J., Paré-Blagoev E.J., Shohamy D., Creso Moyano J., Myers C., Gluck M.A. Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature 2001, 414:546-550.
44. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 2008, 20:873-922.
45. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 1987, 237:1317-1323.
46. Soltani A., De Martino B., Camerer C. A range-normalization model of context-dependent choice: a new model and evidence. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002607.
47. Summerfield C., Mangels J.A. Coherent theta-band EEG activity predicts item-context binding during encoding. Neuroimage 2005, 24:692-703.
48. Summerfield C., Egner T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:403-409.
49. Summerfield C., Trittschuh E.H., Monti J.M., Mesulam M.M., Egner T. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1004-1006.
50. Summerfield C., Behrens T.E., Koechlin E. Perceptual classification in a rapidly changing environment. Neuron 2011, 71:725-736.
51. Tenenbaum J.B., Griffiths T.L. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:629-640. discussion 652-791.
52. Todorovic A., van Ede F., Maris E., de Lange F.P. Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:9118-9123.
53. Tremblay L., Schultz W. Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex. Nature 1999, 398:704-708.
54. Tsetsos K., Chater N., Usher M. Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:9659-9664.
55. Tsetsos K., Gao J., McClelland J.L., Usher M. Using Time-Varying Evidence to Test Models of Decision Dynamics: Bounded Diffusion vs. the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6:79.
56. Usher M., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:550-592.
57. Usher M., Cohen J.D., Servan-Schreiber D., Rajkowski J., Aston-Jones G. The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science 1999, 283:549-554.
58. Vlaev I., Chater N., Stewart N., Brown G.D. Does the brain calculate value?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:546-554.
59. Wald A., Wolfowitz J. Bayes Solutions of Sequential Decision Problems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1949, 35:99-102.
60. Wang X.J. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 2002, 36:955-968.
61. Webb B.S., Tinsley C.J., Barraclough N.E., Parker A., Derrington A.M. Gain control from beyond the classical receptive field in primate primary visual cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 2003, 20:221-230.
62. Wei, X.-X., and Stocker, A.A. (2012). Efficient coding provides a direct link between prior and likelihood in perceptual Bayesian inference. P.L. Bartlett, F.C.N. Pereira, C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K.Q. Weinberger, eds. Proceedings of NIPS 25, 1313-1321.
63. Wierda S.M., van Rijn H., Taatgen N.A., Martens S. Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:8456-8460.
64. Wiggs C.L., Martin A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8:227-233.
65. Wyart V., de Gardelle V., Scholl J., Summerfield C. Rhythmic fluctuations in evidence accumulation during decision making in the human brain. Neuron 2012, 76:847-858.
66. Wyart V., Nobre A.C., Summerfield C. Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:3593-3598.
67. Yang T., Shadlen M.N. Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature 2007, 447:1075-1080.
68. Zylberberg A., Oliva M., Sigman M. Pupil dilation: a fingerprint of temporal selection during the "attentional blink". Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:316.