Teaching Argumentation Existentially: Argumentation Pedagogy and Theories of Rhetoric as Epistemic

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 76-86

  Gehrke, Pat J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896226409     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1998.11951622     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andrews, Richard., “Democracy and the Teaching of Argument.” English Journal 83 (1994): 62–69.
2. Bile, Jeffery Thomas., “Communication, Advocacy, Argumentation and Feminisms: Toward a Dialectical Partnership.” Speaker and Gavel 32 (1995): 55–70.
3. Conway, Daniel W., “Nietzsche and Autonomy in Communication Ethics.” Communication 12 (1991): 217–232.
4. Corcoran, Joseph., An Introduction to Non-Policy Debating. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt, 1988.
5. Crenshaw, Carrie., “The Arguer's Identity: A Feminist Perspective on the Practice of Argumentation Theory.” Speaker and Gavel 32 (1995): 13–25.
6. Cronen, Vernon E., “Teaching Students to Evaluate Arguments.” The Speech Teacher 22 (1973): 107–113.
7. Desilet, Gregory., “Nietzsche Contra Burke: The Melodrama of Dramatism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 75 (1989): 65–83.
8. Fahnestock, Judith, and Marie, Secor. “Teaching Argument: A Theory of Types.” College Composition and Communication 34 (1983): 20–42.
9. Fay, Thomas A., “Communication of Truth and the Existential Dialectic in the Thought of Kierkegaard.” The Personalist 53 (1972): 161–169.
10. Foucault, Michel., “The Order of Discourse.” Trans. Ian McLeod. Language and Politics. Ed. Michael, Shapiro. New York: New York University Press, 1984. 108–138.
11. Freeley, Austin J., Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 9th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1996.
12. Fulkerson, Richard., “Transcending Our Conception of Argumentation in Light of Feminist Critiques.” Argumentation and Advocacy 32 (1996): 199–217.
13. Hample, Dale., “Teaching the Cognitive Context of Argument.” Communication Education 34 (1985): 196–204.
14. Hart, Roderick P., “Teaching Persuasion.” Teaching Communication: Theory, Research and Methods. Eds. John A., Daly, Gustav W., Friedrich, and Anita L., Vangelisti. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990. 105–114.
15. Hart, Roderick P. “Why Communication? Why Education? Toward a Politics of Teaching.” Communication Education 42 (1993): 97–105.
16. Haynes-Burton, Cynthia., “The Ethico-Political Agon of Other Criticisms: Toward a Nietzschean Counter-Ethic.” Pre/Text 11 (1990): 290–308.
17. Hollihan, Thomas A., and Kevin T., Baaske. Arguments and Arguing. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994.
18. Infante, Dominic A., Arguing Constructively. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1988.
19. Johannesen, Richard L., Ethics in Human Communication, 3rd ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1990.
20. McMillan, Jill J., and George, Cheney. “The Student as Consumer: The Implications and Limitations of a Metaphor.” Communication Education 45 (1996): 1–15.
21. Nietzsche, Friedrich W., Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books, 1966.
22. Nietzsche, Friedrich W. “The Dawn.” Trans. Walter Kauffman. The Portable Nietzsche. Ed. Walter, Kaufmann. New York: Viking Press, 1968. 76–92.
23. Perella, Jack., The Debate Method of Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Argumentation. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt, 1987.
24. Pine, Gerald John., “Existential Teaching and Learning.” Education 95 (1974): 18–24.
25. Porter, James I., “Nietzsche's Rhetoric: Theory and Strategy.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 27 (1994): 218–224.
26. Rieke, Richard D., and Malcolm O., Sillars. Argumentation and the Decision Making Process, 2nd ed. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1984.
27. Royer, Maijorie., “Profile of the Existential Teacher.” Contemporary Education 44 (1972): 106–111.
28. Rybacki, Karyn C., and Donald J., Rybacki. Advocacy and Opposition: An Introduction to Argumentation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice/Hall, 1986.
29. Sanders, Gerald., Introduction to Contemporary Academic Debate, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1983.
30. Sanders, Judith, Richard L., Wiseman, and Robert H., Gass. “Does Teaching Argumentation Facilitate Critical Thinking?” Communication Reports 7 (1994): 27–35.
31. Schiappa, Edward., “Interdisciplinarity and Social Practice: Reflections on Dow, Condit, and Swartz.” Communication Studies 46 (1995): 140–147.
32. Scott, Robert L., “A Fresh Attitude Toward Rationalism.” The Speech Teacher 17 (1968): 134–139.
33. Scott, Robert L. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” Central States Speech Journal 18 (1967): 9–17.
34. Scott, Robert L. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later.” Central Stales Speech Journal 28 (1977): 258–266.
35. Scott, Robert L. “Rhetoric and Spirituality: Three Issues—A Reply to Bineham.” Communication Studies 40 (1989): 172–176.
36. Scott, Robert L. “Some Implications of Existentialism for Rhetoric.” Central States Speech Journal 15 (1964): 267–278.
37. Shor, Ira., Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
38. Swartz, Omar., Conducting Socially Responsible Research: Critical Theory, Neo-Pragmatism, and Rhetorical Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1997.
39. Swartz, Omar. “Interdisciplinary and Pedagogical Implications of Rhetorical Theory.” Communication Studies 46 (1995): 130–139.
40. Thomas, Douglas., “Burke, Nietzsche, Lacan: Three Perspectives on the Rhetoric of Order.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (1993): 336–355.
41. Whitson, Steve, and John, Poulakos. “Nietzsche and the Aesthetics of Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (1993): 131–145.
42. Winebrenner, T. C., “Demystifying Debate.” Intercollegiate Forensics, 2nd ed. Ed. T. C., Winebrenner. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt, 1997. 257–271.
43. Zarefsky, David., “Sorting Out the Issues in the Epistemic Status of Rhetoric—A reply to Bineham.” Communication Studies 40 (1989): 177–181.