Emergent bioinformatics and newly distributed innovation processes

The Economic Dynamics of Modern Biotechnology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 235-260

  McMeekin, Andrew ^a   Harvey, Mark ^a   Gee, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896196038     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845420611.00017     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Carlsson, B. (ed.) (1997), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, Boston and Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Carlsson, B. and R. Stankiewicz (1995), 'On the nature, function and composition of technological systems', in B. Carlsson (ed.), Technological Stystems and Economic Performance: the Case of Factory Automation, Boston and Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson, M. Holmen and A. Rickne (2002), 'Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues', Research Policy, 31(2), 233-45.
4. Cooke, P. (2001), 'New economy innovation systems: biotechnology in Europe and the USA', Industry & Innovation, 8, 267-89.
5. Cooke, P. (2002), Knowledge Economies, London: Routledge.
6. Coombs, R., M. Harvey and B. Tether (forthcoming), 'Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation', Industrial and Corporate Change.
7. DTI (1999), Biotechnology Clusters, London: Department of Trade & Industry.
8. Dohse, D. (2000), 'Technology policy and the regions: the case of the BioRegio Contest', Research Policy, 29, 1111-33.
9. Faulkner, W. and J. Senker (1994), 'Making sense of diversity: research linkage between industry and public sector research in three technologies', Research Policy, 23(6), 673-95.
10. Fransman, M. (2001), 'Designing Dolly: interactions between economics, technology and science and the evolution of hybrid institutions', Research Policy, 30(2), 263-73.
11. Harvey,M. and A. McMeekin (2002), 'UK bioinformatics: current landscapes and future horizons', DTI report, London, March.
12. Hodgman, H. (2002), Presentation to DTI, London.
13. Lemarié, S., V. Mangematin, and A. Torre (2001), 'Is the creation and development of biotech SMEs localised? Conclusions drawn from the French case', Small Business Economics, 17, 61-76.
14. LION Bioscience (1998), 'LION Bioscience acquires SRS technolgy from EMBL to accelerate genomics integration program', press release, Florida, USA, September 17.
15. LION Bioscience (1999), 'LION Bioscience and Bayer enter US$100M research alliance', press release, Heidelberg, Germany, 24 June.
16. LION Bioscience (2000), 'LION Bioscience and Bayer pioneer linkage between chemistry & genomics to speed life science discovery research', press release, Heidelberg, Germany, 16 October.
17. LION Bioscience (2001), 'LION Bioscience reaches major milestone in collaboration with Bayer AG for the identification and validation of drug targets', press release, Heidelberg, Germany, 5 April.
18. LION and MDL (2001), 'LION Bioscience AG and MDL Information Systems, Inc. sign software and reseller agreements', press release, Heidelberg, Germany and San Leandro, USA, 19 July.
19. LION Bioscience and GMD (2001), 'LION Bioscience supports expansion of Gesellschaft für Medizinische Datenverarbeitung', press release, Heidelberg, Germany and Munich, Germany, 21 February.
20. LIONBioscience andTrega (2000), 'LION Bioscience to acquireTrega Biosciences', press release, Heidelberg, Germany, and San Diego, USA, 27 December.
21. Lundvall, B.-A., B. Johnson, E.S. Andersen and B. Dalum (2002), 'National systems of production, innovation and competence building', Research Policy, 31, 213-231.
22. Malerba, F. (2002), 'Sectoral systems of innovation and production', Research Policy, 31(2), 247-64.
23. McMeekin, A. and M. Harvey (2002), 'The formation of bioinformatic knowledge markets: an "economies of knowledge" approach', Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 101(4), 47-64.
24. Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Oliver, S. (2002), 'To-day, we have naming of parts . . .', Nature Biotechnology, 20(1), 27-8.
26. Orsenigo, L., F. Pammolli and M. Riccaboni (2001), 'Technological change and network dynamics: lessons from the pharmaceutical industry', Research Policy, 30, 485-508.
27. Owen-Smith, J., M. Riccaboni, F. Pammolli and W.W. Powell. (2002), 'A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences', Management Science.
28. Powell, W.W. and J. Owen-Smith (1998), 'Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2), 253-77.
29. Powell, W., K. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996), 'Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology', Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 41, 116-45.
30. Rappert, B., A. Webster and C. Charles (1999), 'Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic - industrial relations and intellectual property', Research Policy, 28, 873-90.
31. Rybak, B. (1968), Psyché, Soma, Germen, Paris: Gallimard.
32. Rybak, B. (1978), 'Bio-informatics and Bio-process in the physiology of communication', Biosciences Communications, 4(3-4), 158-9.
33. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.
34. Senker, J. and P. van Zwanenberg (2001), 'European biotechnology innovation system,' final report for EC TSER project (SOE1-CT98-1117), Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
35. Stankiewicz, R. (2001), 'The cognitive dynamics of technology and the evolution of its technological system', in B. Carlsson (ed.), New Technological Systems in the Bio-Industry - an International Comparison, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
36. Storper, M. and B. Harrison (1991), 'Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: the changing structure of production systems and their governance in the 1990s', Research Policy, 20, 407-22.