Is the Creation and Development of Biotech SMEs Localised? Conclusions Drawn from the French Case

Small Business Economics

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 61-76

  Lemarie S ^a   Mangematin, V ^a   Torre, A ^b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035610461     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011197616151     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Almedia, P. and B. Kogut, 1997, 'The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localisation of Innovation', Small Business Economics 9, 21-31.
2. Anselin L., A. Varga and Z. Acs, 1997, 'Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations', Journal of Urban Economics 42, 422-448.
3. Autant-Bernard C. and N. Massard, 1998, 'Econométrie des Externalités Technologiques et Géographie de l'Innovation: Une Analyse Critique', Working paper, CREUSET, Université de Saint Etienne.
4. Audretsch, D. and M. Feldman, 1996, 'R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production', American Economic Review 86(3), 630-640.
5. Audretsch, D. and P. Stephan, 1996, 'Company Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology', American Economic Review 86(3), 641-652.
6. Ernst & Young, 1999, Germany's Biotechnology Takes off in 1998, Stuttgart: Schitag, Ernst & Young.
7. Feldman, M., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Feldman, M., 1999, 'The New Economics of Innovation, Spillover and Agglomeration: Review of Empirical Studies', Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8(1), 5-25.
9. Fujita, M. and J. F. Thisse, 1997, 'Economie Géographique. Problèmes Anciens et Nouvelles Perspectives', Annales d'Economie et Statistiques 45, 37-87.
10. Genet, C., 1997, 'Quelles Conditions pour la Formation des Biotechnopoles?', Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 3, 405-424.
11. Hatchuel, A. and B. Weil, 1995, Experts in Organisations: A Knowledge Based Perspective on Organizational Change, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
12. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson, 1993, 'Geographic Localisation of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidence by Patent Citations', Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577-598.
13. Krugman, P., 1991, 'Increasing Returns and Economic Geography', Journal of Political Economy 99(3), 483-499.
14. Lemarié, S. and V. Mangematin, 2000, 'Biotech Firms in France', Biofutur (Special Issue), 32-42.
15. Lemarié, S., M. A. de Looze and V. Mangematin, 2000, 'Dynamics of Innovation and Strategies of Development of SMEs in Biotechnology: The Role of Size, Technology and Market.', Scientometrics 47(3), 541-560.
16. Llerena, P. and V. Schaeffer, 1995, 'Politiques Technologiques Locales de Diffusion: Recherche Interne et Mode de Coordination', in A. Rallet and A. Torre (eds.), Economie Industrielle et Économie Spatiale, Paris: Economica, pp. 403-420.
17. Mangematin, V. and N. Mandran, 1999, 'Les Entreprises Peu Intensives en R&D Peuvent-elles Bénéficier des Externalités de la Recherche Publique: Implications pour les Politiques de Soutien à l'Innovation', Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurale 53, 27-48.
18. Mangematin, V. and L. Nesta, 1999, 'What Kind of Knowledge can a Firm Absorb?', International Journal of Technology Management 37(3), 149-172.
19. Mangematin, V., 2000, 'PhD Job Market: Professional Trajectories and Incentives During the PhD', Research Policy 29(6), 741-756.
20. Mangematin, V., 2000, 'Competing Business Models in the French Biotech Industry', in J. de la Motte and J. Niosi (eds.), The Economic and Social Dynamics of Biotechnology, Boston: Kluwer.
21. MENRT (Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie) survey. http.//biotech.education.fr.
22. Monsan, P., 2000, 'Twenty Years of Biotech in France', Biofutur (Special Issue), 27-30.
23. Mustar, P., 1993, La Création d'Entreprise par les Chercheurs, Thèse, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris.
24. Rallet, A. and A. Torre, 1998, 'On Geography and Technology: Proximity Relations in Localised Innovation Networks', in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation. On Geography and Technology Networks, European Research in Regional Science (8). London: Pion Limited, pp. 41-56.
25. Rosenberg, N., 1990, 'Why Companies do Basic Research with Their Own Money?', Research Policy 19, 165-174.
26. Saviotti, P., 1994, 'Knowledge, Information and Organisational Structure', Eleventh International Economic History congress, Milan, 12-16 September.
27. Torre, A. and J. P. Gilly, 2000, 'On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics', Regional Studies (forthcoming).
28. Zucker, L. and M. Darby, 1997, 'Present at the Biotechnological Revolution: Transformation of Technical Identity for a Large Incumbent Pharmaceutical Firm', Research Policy 26(4-5), 429-446.
29. Zucker, L., M. Darby, and M. Torero, 1997a, Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce, NBER Working paper, No. 6050.
30. Zucker, L., M. Darby and B. Brewer, 1997b, 'Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of the U.S. Biotechnology Enterprise', American Economic Review 87(1).