Footloose capital, market access and the geography of regional state aid

Multinational Firms' Location and the New Economic Geography

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 156-177

  Ottaviano, Gianmarco I P ^a,b,c  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b GIIS   (Switzerland)

^c CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896182662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845420628.00017     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Brander, J.A. (1995) ‘Strategic trade policy’, in G.M. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. 3, Amsterdam: North Holland.
2. Brander, J.A. and P.R. Krugman (1983), ‘A reciprocal dumping model of international trade’, Journal of International Economics, 15, 313-23.
3. Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1984), ‘Tariff protection and imperfect competition’, in H. Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Braunerhjelm, P., R. Faini, V. Norman, F. Ruane and P. Seabright (2000), Integration and Regions in Europe: How the Right Policies Can Prevent Polarization, Monitoring European Integration 10, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
5. Brülhart, M. and F. Trionfetti (2001), ‘Industrial structure and public procurement: theory and empirical evidence’, Journal of Economic Integration, 16, 106-27.
6. Davis D.R. (1998), ‘The home market effect, trade, and industrial structure, American Economic Review, 88, 1264-76.
7. Davis D.R. and D.E. Weinstein (1998), ‘Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical assessment’, NBER Working Paper No. 6787.
8. Davis D.R. and D.E.Weinstein (1999), ‘Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation’, European Economic Review, 43, 379-407.
9. Dixit, A.K. and J.E. Stiglitz (1977), ‘Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity’, American Economic Review, 67, 297-308.
10. European Commission (1995), Free movement of people, DGX European Dialogue, 1.
11. European Commission (2001a), Regional State Aid Map 1999, DG Competition, http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition.
12. European Commision (2001b), EU Structural Funds 2000-2006, DG Employment and Social Affairs, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employmentsocial.
13. Feenstra R.C., J.R. Markusen and A.K. Rose (1998), ‘Understanding the home market effect and the gravity equation: the role of differentiated goods’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2035.
14. Feenstra R.C., J.R. Markusen and A.K. Rose (2001), ‘Using the gravity equation to differentiate between alternative models of trade’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 430-47.
15. Fujita, M., P. Krugman and A.J. Venables (1999). The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Head, K. and T. Mayer (2000), ‘Non-Europe. The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136, 285-314.
17. Head, K. and J. Ries (forthcoming), ‘Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US-Canada trade, American Economic Review.
18. Head, K., T. Mayer and J. Ries (2000), ‘On the pervasiveness of the home market effect’, Economica, 69, 371-90.
19. Helpman, E. (1990), ‘Monopolistic competition in trade theory’, Special Paper in International Economics, 16, Princeton University, International Finance Section.
20. Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1989), Trade Policy and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Krugman, P.R. (1980), ‘Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade’, American Economic Review, 70, 950-59.
23. Krugman, P.R. (1993) ‘The hub effect: or, threeness in international trade’, in W.J. Ethier, E. Helpman and J.P. Neary (eds), Theory, Policy and Dynamics in International Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. McCallum, J. (1995), ‘National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns’, American Economic Review, 85, 615-23.
25. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., H.G. Overman, S.J. Redding and A.J. Venables (2000), ‘The location of European industry’, European Commission, DG Economic and Financial Affairs, Economic Paper No. 142.
26. Ottaviano, G.I.P. and J.-F. Thisse (2002). ‘Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility’, Journal of Public Economics, 83, 429-56.
27. Ottaviano, G.I.P., T. Tabuchi and J.-F. Thisse (2002), ‘Agglomeration and trade revisited’, International Economic Review, 43, 409-43.
28. Trionfetti, F. (1998), ‘On the home market effect: theory and empirical evidence’, CEP Working Paper No. 987, London School of Economics.
29. Weder, R. (1997) ‘British and American exports: an empirical analysis of comparative home-market advantage’, University of British Columbia, mimeo.