Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU

Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 284-314

  Head, Keith ^a   Mayer, Thierry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034393562     PISSN: 00432636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02707689     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, M., and S. Smith (1999). Do National Borders Really Matter? Canada-US Regional Trade Reconsidered. Review of International Economics 7(2): 219-227.
2. Anderson, S. P., A. De Palma, and J-F. Thisse (1992). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Bergstrand, J. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474-481.
4. Buigues, P., F. Ilkovitz, and J-F. Lebrun (1990). The Impact of the Internal Market by Industrial Sector: The Challenge for Member States. European Economy, Social Europe, special edition. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.
5. Commission of the EC (1988). Research on the Cost of Non-Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.
6. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (1997). Technology and Bilateral Trade. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6253. Cambridge, Mass.
7. Engel, C., and J. Rogers (1996). How Wide Is the Border? American Economic Review 86(5): 1112-1125.
8. Fontagné, L., M. Freudenberg, and N. Péridy (1998). Intra-Industry Trade and the Single Market: Quality Matters. Center for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 1952. London.
9. Geroski, P. (1991). 1992 and European Industrial Structure. In G. MacKenzie and A. J. Venables (eds.), The Economics of the Single European Act. London: Macmillan.
10. Hanson, G. (1998). Market Potential, Increasing Returns, and Geographic Concentration. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6429. Cambridge, Mass.
11. Harrigan, J. (1996): Openness to Trade in Manufactures in the OECD. Journal of International Economics 40 (1): 23-39.
12. Haveman, J., and D. Hummels (1997). What Can We Learn from Bilateral Trade? Gravity and Beyond. Mimeo
13. Head, K., and J. Ries (1999). Armington Vs. Krugman: A Test of Two Trade Models. International Business Trade and Finance Working Paper 99/02. University of British Columbia.
14. Helliwell, J. (1996). Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade? Canadian Journal of Economics 29 (3): 507-522.
15. _ (1997). National Borders, Trade and Migration. Pacific Economic Review 3 (3): 165-185.
16. Hillberry, R. (1998). Regional Trade and the 'Medicine Line': The Border Effect in US Commodity Flow Data. Journal of Borderland Studies 8 (2): 1-17.
17. Krugman, P. R. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review 70 (5): 950-959.
18. Leamer, E. (1997). Access to Western Markets, and Eastern Effort Levels. In S. Zecchini (ed.), Lessons from the Economic Transition: Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. McCallum, J. (1995). National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade. Patterns. American Economic Review 85 (3): 615-623.
20. Neven, D. J., and L-H. Roeller (1991). European Integration and Trade Flows. European Economic Review 35 (6): 1295-1309.
21. Neven, D., G. Norman, and J-F. Thisse (1991). Attitudes Towards Foreign Products and International Price Competition. Canadian Journal of Economics 24 (1): 1-11.
22. Nitsch, V. (1997). National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union. Manuscript.
23. Smith, A., and A. Venables (1988). Completing the Internal Market in the European Community. European Economic Review 32 (7): 1501-1525.
24. Wei, S.-J. (1996). Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn Are Nations in Global Integration? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper # 5531. Cambridge, Mass.
25. Wolf, H. C. (1997). Patterns of Intra- and Inter-State Trade. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #5939. Cambridge, Mass.