Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water

Water Research

Volumn 41, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 3227-3240

  Verliefde, A R D ^a   Heijman, S G J ^a,b   Cornelissen, E R ^b   Amy, G ^c   Van der Bruggen, B ^d   van Dijk, J C ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Adsorption; Charge effects; Nanofiltration; Pharmaceuticals; Rejection

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; DRUG PRODUCTS; NANOFILTRATION; SURFACE WATERS;

CHARGE EFFECTS; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER (NOM); REMOVAL EFFICIENCY;

WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED CARBON; AMINOPHENAZONE; ATENOLOL; ATRAZINE; BEZAFIBRATE; CARBAMAZEPINE; CLENBUTEROL; CLOFIBRIC ACID; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DICLOFENAC; DIURON; FENOPROFEN; GEMFIBROZIL; IBUPROFEN; KETOPROFEN; METAMITRON; METOPROLOL; PENTOXIFYLLINE; PHENAZONE; PINDOLOL; PROPRANOLOL; SALBUTAMOL; SIMAZINE; SOTALOL; SURFACE WATER; TERBUTALINE;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; DRUG PRODUCTS; NANOFILTRATION; SURFACE WATERS; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; DRUG; FILTRATION; ORGANIC MATTER; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SURFACE WATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; ELECTRICITY; NANOFILTRATION; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 34447104501     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agbekodo K.M., Legube B., and Dard S. Atrazine and simazine removal mechanisms by nanofiltration: influence of natural organic matter concentration. Water Res. 30 11 (1996) 2535-2542
2. Bellona C., and Drewes J.E. The role of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249 (2005) 227-234
3. Braeken L., Ramaekers R., Zhang Y., Maes G., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. J. Membr. Sci. 252 1-2 (2005) 195-203
4. Chellam S., and Taylor J.S. Simplified analysis of contaminant rejection during ground- and surface water nanofiltration under the information collection rule. Water Res. 35 10 (2001) 2460-2474
5. Heijman S.G.J., and Hopman R. Activated carbon filtration in drinking water production: model prediction and new concepts. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 151 (1999) 303-310
6. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., Heberer T., Kim T., and Watanabe Y. Rejection of organic micropollutants (disinfection by-products, endocrine disrupting compounds, and pharmaceutically active compounds) by NF/RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 227 (2003) 113-121
7. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., and Watanabe Y. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 221 (2003) 89-101
8. Kimura K., Toshima S., Amy G., and Watanabe Y. Rejection of neutral endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) by RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 245 (2004) 71-78
9. Mänttäri M., Pihlajamäki A., and Nyström M. Comparison of nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes in the filtration of paper mill process water. Desalination 149 (2002) 131-136
10. Nghiem L.D., and Schäfer A.I. Adsorption and transport of trace contaminant estrone in NF/RO membranes. Environ. Eng. Sci. 19 6 (2002) 441-451
11. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I., and Elimelech M. Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 1888-1896
12. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I., and Elimelech M. Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 7698-7705
13. Park G., Lee J.H., Kim I.S., and Cho J. Pharmaceutical rejection by membranes for wastewater reclamation and reuse. Water Sci. Technol. 50 2 (2004) 239-244
14. Pronk W., Palmquist H., Biebow M., and Boller M. Nanofiltration for the separation of pharmaceuticals from nutrients in source-separated urine. Water Res. 40 (2006) 1405-1412
15. Puijker L., and Mons M. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Water Cycle-International Review. Kiwa Report KWR 04.013 (2004), Kiwa N.V. Water Research, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
16. Sacher F., Lange F.T., Brauch H.-J., and Blankenhorn I. Pharmaceuticals in groundwaters: analytical methods and results of a monitoring program in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. J. Chromatogr. A 938 (2001) 199-210
17. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters. Desalination 131 (2000) 215-224
18. Tetko I.V., and Bruneau P. Application of ALOGPS to predict 1-octanol/water distribution coefficients, log P, and log D, of AstraZeneca in-house database. J. Pharm. Sci. 93 12 (2004) 3103-3110
19. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Maes W., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters. Desalination 117 (1998) 139-147
20. Yoon Y., Westerhoff P., Snyder S.A., and Wert E.C. Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products. J. Membr. Sci. 270 (2006) 88-100
21. Zhang Y., Van der Bruggen B., Chen G., Braeken L., and Vandecasteele C. Removal of pesticides by nanofiltration: effect of the water matrix. Sep. Purif. Technol. 38 2 (2004) 163-172