Making local places ge-free in California's contentious geographies of genetic pollution and coexistence

Contentious Geographies: Environmental Knowledge, Meaning, Scale

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 147-162

  Mulvaney, Dustin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896125797     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Alstad, D. and Andow, D. (1995), 'Managing the Evolution of Insect Resistance to Transgenic Plants', Science 268, 1894-1896.
2. Associated Press (2006), 'Genetic Crop Bill OK'd by California Assembly', Monterey Herald (Monterey, California).
3. Benbrook, C. (2003), 'Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Eight Years', Biotech InfoNet.
4. Boyd, W. (2003), 'Wonderful Potencies? Deep Structure and the Problem of Monopoly in Agricultural Biotechnologies', in Schurman, R. and Takahashi Kelso, D. (eds), Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and its Discontents (Berkeley: University of California Press).
5. Castells, M. (1996), The Power of Idenity (Cambridge: Oxford University Press).
6. Center for Food Safety (2005), 'Monsanto vs. US Farmers', Washington DC.
7. Douglas, M. (2002), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge).
8. Economic Research Service (2001), 'Briefing Room: Rice Background', Economic Research Service, USDA.
9. Ellstrand, N., Prentice, H. and Hancock, J. (1999), 'Gene Flow and Introgression from Domesticated Plants into their Wild Relatives', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30, 539-63.
10. Fowler, C. and Mooney, P. (1990), Shattering: Food, Politics, and the Loss of Genetic Diversity (Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press).
11. Fox, J. (2003), 'Puzzling Industry Reponse to Prodigene Fiasco', Nature Biotechnology 21, 3-4.
12. Freudenburg, W. and Gramling, R. (1994), Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle Over Offshore Drilling (Binghamton, NY: SUNY Press).
13. Geniella, M. (2004), 'Mendocino County Voters Ban Biotech Crops', Santa Rosa Press Democrat.
14. Gettman, J. and Armentano, P. (1998), 1998 Marijuana Crop Report: An Evaluation of Marijuana Production, Value, and Eradication Efforts in the United States.
15. Gottweis, H. (1998), Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
16. Gould, F. (1998), 'Sustainability of Transgenic Insecticidal Cultivars: Integrating Pest Genetics and Ecology', Annual Review of Entomology 43, 701-26.
17. Hajer, M. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
18. Hamburg, L. (2003), 'Farmers, Families Fight for a GMO-free Mendocino', Bullhorn, Mendocino Organic Network.
19. Hay, I. (2000), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
20. Heffernan, W. (1999), 'Biotechnology and Mature Capitalism', 11th Annual Meeting of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Lincoln, NE.
21. Henson, D. (2001), 'Asserting Democratic Control of Food Agriculture', By What Authority? Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy, Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy.
22. Howard, T. and Rifkin, J. (1977), Who Should Play God? The Artificial Creation of Life and What it Means for the Future of the Human Race (New York: Delacorte Press).
23. Kapuscinski, A. (2002), 'Controversies in Designing Useful Ecological Assessments of Genetically Engineered Organisms', in Letourneau, D. and Burrows, B. (eds), Genetically Engineered Organisms: Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects (New York: CRC Press).
24. Kapuscinski, A. and Hallerman, E. (1990), 'AFS Position Statement: Transgenic Fishes', Fisheries 15, 2-5.
25. Kelso, D. (2004), 'Genetically Engineered Salmon, Ecological Risk, and Environmental Policy', Bulletin of Marine Science 74, 509-28.
26. Kenney, M. (1986), Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex (New Haven: Yale University Press).
27. Kloppenburg, J. (2004), First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).
28. Krimsky, S. (1982), Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy (Cambridge: MA, MIT Press).
29. Krimsky, S. and Plough, A. (1988), Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process (Dover, MA: Auburn House Publishing Company).
30. Letourneau, D. and Burrows, B. (eds) (2002), Genetically Engineered Organisms: Assessing the Environmental and Human Health Effects (New York: CRC Press).
31. Losey, J. (1999), 'Transgenic Pollen Harms Monarch Larvae', Nature 399, 214-215.
32. Lucas, G. (2004), 'Biotech's Initiative's Foes Dig in Deep: $150,000 Donated to Bury Mendocino Crop-ban Measure', San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco, CA.
33. Mccarthy, A. (2006), 'Why Sonoma County's Measure M Failed', Terrain, Ecology Center.
34. Mcgaughey, W., Gould, F. and Gelernter, W. (1998), 'Bt Resistance Management', Nature Biotechnology 16, 144-146.
35. Mendocino County Historical Society (1996), 'The Mills of Mendocino', Mendocino County Historical Society, Ukiah, CA.
36. Merrill, J. and Culp, C. (2001), 'Fetzer Wines Announce Opposition to GE Grapes', Greenpeace News Update.
37. Miller, B. (2000), Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
38. Mills, L. (2002), Science and Social Context: The Regulation of Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone in North America (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press).
39. National Research Council (2002), Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences).
40. Nestle, M. (2003), Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism (Berkeley: University of California Press).
41. Peet, R. and Watts, M. (eds) (2004), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, and Social Movements (London: Routledge).
42. Quist, D. and Chapela, I. (2001), 'Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico', Nature 414, 541-543.
43. Rifkin, J. (1998), The Biotech Century (New York: Putnam).
44. Rissler, J. and Mellon, M. (1996), The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
45. Segarra, A. and Rawson, J. (2001), 'StarLink Corn Controversy: Background', in Economic Research Service (ed.) (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service).
46. Smith, N. (1992), 'Contours of a Spatialized Politics: Vehicles and the Production of Geographical Scale', Social Text 33, 54-81.
47. Snow, A., Andow, D., Gepts, P., Hallerman, E., Power, A., Tiedje, J. and Wolfenbarger, L. (2004), 'Genetically Engineered Organisms and the Environment: Current Status and Recommendations', Ecological Applications 13, 279-86.
48. Somers, T. (2004), 'Voters Shun Bioengineered Foods, but not Everyone in Quircky Northern California Region Favors Shutting Out Science', San Diego Union--Tribune.
49. Swyngedouw, E. (1997), 'Excluding the Other: The Production of Scale and Scaled Politics', in Lee, R. and Wills, J. (eds), Geographies of Economies (London: Arnold Press).
50. Union of Concerned Scientists (2003), 'Pharm and Industrial Crops: The Next Wave of Agricultural Biotechnology', Washington, DC.
51. Williams, R. (1989), Resources of Hope (London: Verso).
52. Wright, S. (1994), Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).