Antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus recovered from recreational and commercial areas of Chesapeake Bay and Maryland Coastal Bays

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Shaw, Kristi S ^a   Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E ^b   He, Xin ^b   Jacobs, John M ^c   Crump, Byron C ^a,d   Sapkota, Amy R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLAVULANIC ACID; AMPICILLIN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; APRAMYCIN; CEFALOTIN; CEFEPIME; CEFOTAXIME; CEFOXITIN; CEFTAZIDIME; CEFTRIAXONE; CEFUROXIME; CEPHALOSPORIN; CHLORAMPHENICOL; CIPROFLOXACIN; COTRIMOXAZOLE; DOXYCYCLINE; GENTAMICIN; IMIPENEM; LEVOFLOXACIN; MEROPENEM; OFLOXACIN; PENICILLIN DERIVATIVE; PIPERACILLIN; PIPERACILLIN PLUS TAZOBACTAM; STREPTOMYCIN; SULTAMICILLIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; BAY; BROTH DILUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RIVER; UNITED STATES; VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING; GENETICS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; VIBRIO INFECTIONS;

ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; BAYS; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; MARYLAND; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; VIBRIO INFECTIONS; VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS;

EID: 84896121922     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089616     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baquero F, Martinez JL, Canton R (2008) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19: 260-265.
2. Martinez JL (2008) Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Natural Environments. Science 321: 365-367.
3. Wright GD (2007) The antibiotic resistome: the nexus of chemical and genetic diversity. Nat Rev Micro 5: 175-186.
4. Baker-Austin C, Stockley L, Rangdale R, Martinez-Urtaza J (2010) Environmental occurrence and clinical impact of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a European perspective. Environmental Microbiology Reports 2: 7-18.
5. Newton A, Kendall M, Vugia DJ, Henao OL, Mahon BE (2012) Increasing rates of vibriosis in the United States, 1996-2010: review of surveillance data from 2 systems. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 54 Suppl 5: S391-395.
6. Martinez-Urtaza J, Baker-Austin C, Jones JL, Newton AE, Gonzalez-Aviles GD, et al. (2013) Spread of Pacific Northwest Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain. The New England journal of medicine 369: 1573-1574.
7. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, et al. (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 7-15.
8. Ralston EP, Kite-Powell H, Beet A (2011) An estimate of the cost of acute health effects from food- and water-borne marine pathogens and toxins in the USA. Journal of water and health 9: 680-694.
9. Baker-Austin C, McArthur JV, Lindell AH, Wright MS, Tuckfield RC, et al. (2009) Multi-site Analysis Reveals Widespread Antibiotic Resistance in the Marine Pathogen Vibrio vulnificus. Microbial Ecology 57: 151-159.
10. Baker-Austin C, McArthur JV, Tuckfield RC, Najarro M, Lindell AH, et al. (2008) Antibiotic resistance in the shellfish pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from the coastal water and sediment of Georgia and South Carolina, USA. J Food Prot 71: 2552-2558.
11. Han F, Walker RD, Janes ME, Prinyawiwatkul W, Ge B (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus isolates from Louisiana Gulf and retail raw oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 7096-7098. (Pubitemid 350076833)
12. Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Rocchegiani E, Mioni R, Costa A, et al. (2013) An extensive investigation into the prevalence and the genetic and serological diversity of toxigenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Italian marine coastal waters. Environmental Microbiology 15: 1377-1386.
13. Shaw K, Sapkota A, Jacobs J, Crump B (2011) Recreational Swimmers' Exposure to Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA. Vibrio 2011: The fourth conference on the biology of vibrios. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
14. Wright AC, Hill RT, Johnson JA, Roghman MC, Colwell RR, et al. (1996) Distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62: 717-724. (Pubitemid 26047441)
15. Jacobs JM, Rhodes MR, Brown CW, Hood RR, Leight AK, et al. (2010) Predicting the distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in Chesapeake Bay. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCOOS 112. NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, Cooperative Oxford Laboratory. Oxford, MD.
16. Colwell RR, Kaper J, Joseph SW (1977) Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Other Vibrios: Occurrence and Distribution in Chesapeake Bay. Science 198: 394-396. (Pubitemid 8229039)
17. Banakar V, Constantin de Magny G, Jacobs J, Murtugudde R, Huq A, et al. (2011) Temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay: a hindcast study. EcoHealth 8: 456-467.
18. Johnson CN, Bowers JC, Griffitt KJ, Molina V, Clostio RW, et al. (2012) Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in the coastal and estuarine waters of Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, and Washington, United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 7249-7257.
19. CFSAN (Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition USFDA (2005) Quantitative Risk Assessment on the Public Health Impact of Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Raw Oysters. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
20. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011) Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: interpretative summary and technical report. Geneva; Rome: World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. xvii, p.183.
21. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2005) Risk assessment of Vibrio vulnificus in raw oysters: interpretative summary and technical report. Geneva; Rome: World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. xvii, p.114.
22. Baker-Austin C, Trinanes JA, Taylor NGH, Hartnell R, Siitonen A, et al. (2013) Emerging Vibrio risk at high latitudes in response to ocean warming. Nature Climate Change. 3: 73-77.
23. Scallan E, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Hoekstra RM (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-unspecified agents. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 16-22.
24. Thomas J, Woerner J, Abele R, Cain C, Charland J, et al. (2009) Ch. 5, St. Martin River. Shifting Sands: Environmental and cultural change in Maryland's Coastal Bays. Cambridge, MD. 89-100 p.
25. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH, American Public Health Association, et al. (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. 1 v. (various pagings).
26. Panicker G, Bej AK (2005) Real-time PCR detection of Vibrio vulnificus in oysters: comparison of oligonucleotide primers and probes targeting vvhA. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 5702-5709. (Pubitemid 41456858)
27. Nordstrom JL, Vickery MC, Blackstone GM, Murray SL, DePaola A (2007) Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with an internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5840-5847. (Pubitemid 47462996)
28. Baker-Austin C, Anthony Gore, James D Oliver, Rachel Rangdale, J Vaun McArthur, David N Lees (2010) Rapid in situ detection of virulent Vibrio vulnificus strains in raw oyster matrices using real-time PCR. Environmental Microbiology Reports 2: 76-80.
29. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Research 8: 175-185. (Pubitemid 28177229)
30. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Research 8: 186-194. (Pubitemid 28177230)
31. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P (1998) Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Research 8: 195-202. (Pubitemid 28177231)
32. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1363-1371. (Pubitemid 38854737)
33. CLSI (2010) Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline-Second Edition (M45-A2). Wayne, Pennsylvania.
34. Chiew YF, Yeo SF, Hall LM, Livermore DM (1998) Can susceptibility to an antimicrobial be restored by halting its use? The case of streptomycin versus Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 41: 247-251. (Pubitemid 28083128)
35. Vizcaino MI, Johnson WR, Kimes NE, Williams K, Torralba M, et al. (2010) Antimicrobial resistance of the coral pathogen Vibrio coralliilyticus and Caribbean sister phylotypes isolated from a diseased octocoral. Microb Ecol 59: 646-657.
36. COMAR (2013) Maryland Code of Regulations: 26.08.02.03-3 Water Quality Criteria Specific to Designated Uses. In: Environment Dot, editor. Annapolis, MD.
37. CDC (2012) Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance Overview. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services.
38. Daniels NA, Shafaie A (2000) A Review of Pathogenic Vibrio Infections for Clinicians. Infections in medicine 17: 665-685.
39. CDC (2013) Vibrio vulnificus: General Information. In: National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases DoF, Waterborne, and Environmental Disease, editor.
40. Joseph SW, DeBell RM, Brown WP (1978) In vitro response to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ampicillin, gentamicin, and beta-lactamase production by halophilic Vibrios from human and environmental sources. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 13: 244-248. (Pubitemid 8280987)
41. Campagnolo ER, Johnson KR, Karpati A, Rubin CS, Kolpin DW, et al. (2002) Antimicrobial residues in animal waste and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations. The Science of the total environment 299: 89-95. (Pubitemid 35287490)
42. Jones A, Carruthers T, Pantus F, Thomas J, Saxby T, et al. (2004) A water quality assessment of the Maryland Coastal Bays including nitrogen source identification using stable isotopes. Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Marine Ecoservices Australia.
43. de Oliveira AJ, Pinhata JM (2008) Antimicrobial resistance and species composition of Enterococcus spp. isolated from waters and sands of marine recreational beaches in Southeastern Brazil. Water Res 42: 2242-2250.
44. Sapkota AR, Curriero FC, Gibson KE, Schwab KJ (2007) Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environmental Health Perspectives 115: 1040.