A general, resistance-in-series, salt- and water flux models for forward osmosis and pressure-retarded osmosis for energy generation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 460, Issue , 2014, Pages 71-81

  Nagy, Endre ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PANNONIA   (Hungary)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Diffusive convective mass transfer; Forward osmosis; Pressure retarded osmosis; Renewable energy production; Salt flux; Water flux

Indexed keywords

OSMOSIS;

FORWARD OSMOSIS; PRESSURE-RETARDED OSMOSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SALT FLUX; WATER FLUX;

TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENERGY YIELD; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 84896106529     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-147.
2. Loeb S. Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis using river water and see water passing through spiral modules. Desalination 2002, 143:115-122.
3. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implication for improved membrane design. AIChE J. 2007, 53:1736-1744.
4. Jiao B., Cassano A., Drioli E. Recent advances on membrane processes for the concentration of fruit juices: a review. J. Food Eng. 2004, 63:201-206.
5. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
6. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:42-52.
7. Kim Y.C., Elimelech M. Potential of osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater as feed solution: analysis and experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:330-337.
8. Chung T.S., Li X., Ong R.C., Ge Q., Wang H., Han G. Emerging forward osmosis technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2012, 1:246-257.
9. Gekas V., Hallstrom B. Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent flow. I. Critical literature and adaption of existing Sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 30:153-170.
10. Zhao S.h., Zou L., Tang C.h.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
11. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent development. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
12. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and fees solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
13. Brian P. Mass transport in reverse osmosis. Desalination by Reverse Osmosis 1966, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Merten (Ed.).
14. Michaels A.S. New separation technique for the CPI. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1968, 64:31-43.
15. Thorsen T., Holt T. The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 335:103-110.
16. She Q., Jin X., Tang C.Y. Osmotis power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: effect of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 401-402:262-273.
17. Fang Y., Bian L., Wang X. Understanding membrane parameters of a forward osmosis membrane based on nonequilibrium thermodynamics. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 437:72-81.
18. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Hoover L.A., Kim Y.C., Elimelech M. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:4360-4369.
19. Sivertsen E., Holt T., Thelin W., Brekke G. Modelling mass tranport in hollow fibre membrane used for pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 417-418:69-79.
20. Sagiv A., Semiat R. Finite element analysis of forward osmosis process using NaCl solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 179:86-96.
21. Miranda J.M., Joa B.L., Campos M. Mass transfer in the vicinity of a separation membrane-applicability of the stagnant film theory. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 202:137-150.
22. Song L. A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 144:173-185.
23. Zydney A.L. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:275-281.
24. Bowen W.R., Jenner F. Theoretical description of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles: an assessment and review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 56:141-142.
25. van den Berg G.B., Rácz L.G., Smolders C.A. Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 47:25-51.
26. Nagy E. Basic Equation of Mass Transport Through a Membrane Layer 2012, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
27. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:243-249.
28. Bird R.B., Stewart W.E., Lightfoot E.N. Transport Phenomena 1960, John Wiley and Sons, New York.