Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: Current status

Biologics: Targets and Therapy

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 83-90

  Smart, Neil J ^a   Bryan, Nicholas ^b   Hunt, John A ^b   Daniels, Ian R ^a  

^a ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biologic; Hernia; Mesh; Xenograft

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; ELASTIN; ISOCYANIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CROSS LINKING; FOLLOW UP; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; PORCINE DERMAL MESH; PROCTOPEXY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE; SOFT TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 84896037186     PISSN: 11775475     EISSN: 11775491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S46469     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Read RC. Milestones in the history of hernia surgery: prosthetic repair. Hernia. 2004;8(1):8-14.
2. Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia. 2010;14(1):81-87.
3. van't Riet M, de van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg E W, Jeekel J. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh? Hernia. 2007;11(5):409-413.
4. Choi JJ, Palaniappa NC, Dallas KB, Rudich TB, Colon MJ, Divino CM. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1): 176-180.
5. Sims TJ, Avery NC, Bailey AJ. Quantitative determination of collagen crosslinks. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;139:11-26.
6. Vater CA, Harris ED Jr, Siegel RC. Native cross-links in collagen fbrils induce resistance to human synovial collagenase. Biochem J. 1979;181(3):639-645.
7. Smart NJ, Bryan N, Hunt JA. A scientifc evidence for the effcacy of biologic implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14 Suppl 3:1-6.
8. Pui CL, Tang ME, Annor AH, et al. Effect of repetitive loading on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):216-228.
9. Annor AH, Tang ME, Pui CL, et al. Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2767-2778.
10. Smart NJ, Bloor S. Durability of biologic implants for use in hernia repair: a review. Surg Innov. 2012;19(3):221-229.
11. Smart NJ, Daniels IR, Marquez S. Supplemental cross-linking in tissue-based surgical implants for abdominal wall repair. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):436-442.
12. Mulier KE, Nguyen AH, Delaney J P, Marquez S. Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Hernia. 2011;15(3):315-319.
13. Cavallo JA, Greco SC, Liu J, Frisella MM, Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a cross-linked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Hernia. Epub March 13, 2013.
14. Eker HH, Hansson BM, Buunen M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):259-263.
15. Burger J W, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):578-583.
16. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):129-135.
17. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD007781.
18. Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, Luchette FA. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):16-26.
19. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148(3):544-558.
20. Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, et al. Criteria for defnition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia. Epub October 23, 2013.
21. Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, June 28-30, 2012. Hernia. 2013;17(4):423-433.
22. Harth KC, Krpata DM, Chawla A, Blatnik JA, Halaweish I, Rosen MJ. Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Hernia. 2013;17(1):13-20.
23. Primus FE, Harris H W. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions. Hernia. 2013;17(1): 21-30.
24. Harris H W. Biologic mesh for ventral hernia repair: a cautionary tale. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):997-998.
25. Petter-Puchner AH, Dietz UA. Biological implants in abdominal wall repair. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):987-988.
26. Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Wang EC, Dumanian GA. Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, signifcantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):836-847.
27. de Moya MA, Dunham M, Inaba K, et al. Long-term outcome of acellular dermal matrix when used for large traumatic open abdomen. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):349-353.
28. Henry CR, Bradburn E, Moyer KE. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(3): 266-268.
29. Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR. Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon. 2012;10(3):159-171.
30. Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G 3rd, Butler CE; RICH Study Group. Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery. 2012;152(3):498-505.
31. Rosen MJ, Denoto G, Itani KM, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes of retro-rectus versus intraperitoneal reinforcement with bio- prosthetic mesh in the repair of contaminated ventral hernias. Hernia. 2013;17(1):31-35.
32. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T. Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(2):217-228.
33. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6): 991-996.
34. Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Gatti M, Bhanot P. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(4):394-398.
35. Guerra O, Maclin MM. Non-crosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for the management of complex ventral abdominal wall hernias: a report of 45 cases. Hernia. Epub August 10, 2013.
36. Zerbib P, Caiazzo R, Piessen G, et al. Outcome in porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement of infected abdominal wall defects: a prospective study. Hernia. Epub September 19, 2013.
37. ) biologic mesh. Am Surg. 2013;79(10): 992-996.
38. Abdelfatah MM, Rostambeigi N, Podgaetz E, Sarr MG. Long-term outcomes (.5-year follow-up) with porcine acellular dermal matrix (Permacol™) in incisional hernias at risk for infection. Hernia. Epub October 16, 2013.
39. Alicuben E T, Demeester SR. Onlay ventral hernia repairs using porcine non-cross-linked dermal biologic mesh. Hernia. Epub February 12, 2013.
40. Diaz-Siso JR, Bueno EM, Pomahac B. Abdominal wall reconstruction using a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold: a follow-up study. Hernia. 2013;17(1):37-44.
41. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation. Multi-Center Study To Examine The Use Of Flex HD® And Strattice In The Repair Of Large Abdominal Wall Hernias. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01987700. NLM identifer: NCT01987700. Accessed January 21, 2014.
42. University Hospitals of Cleveland. Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01746316. NLM identifer: NCT01746316. Accessed January 21, 2014.
43. University Hospital, Lille. Biological Meshes in Infected Fields: a Randomized Controlled Trial (SIMBIOSE). Available from: http:// clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01594450. NLM identifer: NCT01594450. Accessed January 21, 2014.
44. Carolinas Healthcare System. The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorb-able Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01794338. NLM identifer: NCT01794338. Accessed January 21, 2014.
45. Covidien. ENHANCE: A Prospective EvaluatioN of Permacol™ in tHe Repair of Complex AbdomiNal Wall CasEs. Available from: http:// clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01268514. NLM identifer: NCT01268514. Accessed January 21, 2014.
46. Covidien. A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Use of Permacol Surgical Implant in the Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01214252. NLM identifer: NCT01214252. Accessed January 21, 2014.
47. University of Missouri-Columbia. Characterization of Explanted Hernia Meshes From Human Subjects: A Multi-Center, Prospective Study. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00484887. NLM identifer: NCT00484887. Accessed January 21, 2014.
48. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):685-695.
49. Smart NJ, Velineni R, Khan D, Daniels IR. Parastomal hernia repair outcomes in relation to stoma site with diisocyanate cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen mesh. Hernia. 2011;15(4):433-437.
50. Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, Hendriks T, Bleichrodt R P. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1252-1258.
51. Hammond TM, Huang A, Prosser K, Frye JN, Williams NS. Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study. Hernia. 2008;12(5):475-481.
52. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(8):931-936.
53. LifeCell. Parastomal Reinforcement With Strattice (PriSm). Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00771407. NLM identifer: NCT00771407. Accessed January 21, 2014.
54. Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K; West Midlands Research Collaborative. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg. 2012;36(5): 973-983.
55. Bhangu A, Futaba K, Patel A, Pinkney T, Morton D. Reinforcement of closure of stoma site using a biological mesh. Tech Coloproctol. Epub April 3, 2013.
56. Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;2:1812-1813.
57. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J. Extended abdomi-noperineal resection with gluteus maximus fap reconstruction of the pelvic foor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:232-238.
58. Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9): 1052-1059.
59. Kiim Jensen K, Rashid L, Pilsgaard B, Mølle P, Wille-Jørgensen P. Pelvic foor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads to low wound complication and perineal hernia rates with minor movement limitations. Colorectal Dis. Epub November 20, 2013.
60. Kipling SL, Young K, Foster JD, et al. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series. Tech Coloproctol. Epub October 1, 2013.
61. Marshall MJ, Smart NJ, Daniels IR. Biologic meshes in perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE). Colorectal Dis. 2012;14 Suppl 3:12-18.
62. University Hospitals, Leicester. Perineal Reconstruction Following eLAPE and Simultaneous Stoma Sublay Reinforcement (PRESSUR). Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01670851. NLM identifer: NCT01670851. Accessed January 21, 2014.
63. Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Biological Mesh Closure of the Pelvic Floor After Extralevator Abdomino Perineal Resection for Rectal Cancer (BIOPEX). Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01927497. NLM identifer: NCT01927497. Accessed January 21, 2014.
64. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91: 1500-1505.
65. Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P, Daniels IR. Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy - a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(6):650-654.
66. Badrek-Al Amoudi AH, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(6):707-712.
67. Wong KS, Nguyen JN, White T, et al. Adverse events associated with pelvic organ prolapse surgeries that use implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1239-1245.
68. Bryan N, Ahswin H, Smart NJ, Bayon Y, Hunt JA. In vitro activation of human leukocytes in response to contact with synthetic hernia meshes. Clin Biochem. 2012;45(9):672-676.
69. Bryan N, Ashwin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Scarborough N, Hunt JA. The innate oxygen dependant immune pathway as a sensitive parameter to predict the performance of biological graft materials. Biomaterials. 2012;33(27):6380-6392.
70. Bryan N, Ahswin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Wohlert S, Hunt JA. The in vivo evaluation of tissue-based biomaterials in a rat full-thickness abdominal wall defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. Epub October 24, 2013.
71. Bryan N, Ashwin H, Chen R, et al. Evaluation of six synthetic surgical meshes implanted subcutaneously in a rat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. Epub October 7, 2013.