A scientific evidence for the efficacy of biologic implants for soft tissue reconstruction

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL.3, 2012, Pages 1-6

  Smart, N J ^a   Bryan, N ^b   Hunt, J A ^b  

^a ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biologic mesh; Cross linking; Porcine dermis.

Indexed keywords

COLLAGENASE;

HUMAN; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE GROWTH;

ABDOMEN; ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL DRESSINGS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; HUMANS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84869053066     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12042     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. van't Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?Hernia 2007; 11: 409-13.
2. Sims TJ, Avery NC, Bailey AJ. Quantitative determination of collagen cross-links. Methods Mol Biol 2000; 139: 11-26.
3. Vater CA, Harris ED Jr, Siegel RC. Native cross-links in collagen fibrils induce resistance to human synovial collagenase. Biochem J 1979; 181: 639-45.
4. Oliver RF, Hulme MJ, Mudie A, Grant RA. Skin collagen allografts in the rat. Nature 1975; 258: 537-9.
5. Sung HW, Chang WH, Ma CY, Lee MH. Cross-linking of biological tissues using genipin and/or carbodiimide. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 64: 427-38.
6. Yao C, Markowicz M, Pallua N, Noah EM, Steffens G. The effect of cross-linking of collagen matrices on their angiogenic capability. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 66-74.
7. Liang HC, Chang Y, Hsu CK, Lee MH, Sung HW. Effects of cross-linking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3541-52.
8. Pui CL, Tang ME, Annor AH et al. Effect of repetitive loading on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 216-28.
9. Annor AH, Tang ME, Pui CL et al. Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2767-2778.
10. Bryan N, Ashwin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Scarborough N, Hunt JA. The innate oxygen dependant immune pathway as a sensitive parameter to predict the performance of biological graft materials. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 6380-92.
11. Smart NJ, Daniels IR, Marquez S. Supplemental cross-linking in tissue-based surgical implants for abdominal wall repair. Int J Surg 2012; [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.07.010
12. Pascual G, Rodríguez M, Sotomayor S, Moraleda E, Bellón JM. Effects of collagen prosthesis cross-linking on long-term tissue regeneration following the repair of an abdominal wall defect. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20: 402-13.
13. Smart NJ, Bloor S. Durability of biologic implants for use in hernia repair: a review. Surg Innov 2012; 19: 221-229.
14. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 26-37.
15. Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR. Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon 2012; 10: 159-71.
16. Zhong T, Janis JE, Ahmad J, Hofer SO. Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1562-71.