A network approach toward literature review

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 623-643

  Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^a   Bouwman, Harry ^b,c   Contractor, Noshir ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^d Northwestern University   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

eGovernment; Literature review; Meta analysis; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895900622     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9791-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ajzen I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179-211 (1991).
2. Al-adawi, Z., Yousafzai, S., Pallister, J.: Conceptual model of citizen adoption of E-Government. Paper presented at the second international conference on innovations in information technology (2005).
3. Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.: Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard (2002).
4. Bouwman H., van de Wijngaert L.: Coppers, context and conjoints: a reassessment of TAM. J. Inf. Technol. 24, 186-201 (2009).
5. Bouwman H., Fijnvandraat M., van de Wijngaert L.: White spots and black holes: developing a conceptual model for Broadband rollout. INFO 8(1), 72-90 (2006).
6. Burt R.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, New York (1995).
7. Contractor N., Wasserman S., Faust K.: Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: an analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31, 681-703 (2006).
8. Davis F. D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319-340 (1989).
9. Davis, J. A., Leinhardt, S.: The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In: Berger, J. (ed.) Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, pp. 218-251. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1972).
10. De Groot, A. D.: Methodology: foundations of inference and research in the behavioral sciences. The Hague, The Netherlands, Mouton (1969).
11. Dooley D.: Social Research Methods (4th edn). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009).
12. Fishbein M., Ajzen I.: Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975).
13. Frank O., Strauss D.: Markov graphs. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(395), 832-842 (1986).
14. Gefen D., Straub D.: The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. J Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 8 (2000).
15. Hirschheim R.: Introduction to the special issue on quo vadis TAM-issues and reflections on technology acceptance research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(4), 203-205 (2008).
16. Karahanna E., Straub D. W.: The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Inf. Manag. 35(4), 237-250 (1999).
17. Krackhardt D.: QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Netw. 9(2), 171-186 (1987).
18. Kuhn T. S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962).
19. Lee Y., Kozar K. A., Larsen K. R. T.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and the future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 752-780 (2003).
20. Light R. J., Pillemer D. B.: Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984).
21. Lopez-Nicolas C., Molina-Castillo F. J., Bouwman H.: An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Inf. Manag. 45(6), 359-364 (2008).
22. Maas C. J. M., Hox J. J., Lensvelt-Mulders G. J. L. M.: Longitudinal meta-analysis. Qual. Quant. 38(4), 381-389 (2004).
23. Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F.: Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence theoretical bases and empirical validation. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (1999).
24. Popper K. R.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London (1959).
25. *) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29(2), 173-191 (2007).
26. Schepers J., Wetzels M.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manag. 44(1), 90-103 (2007).
27. Schwenk G., Möser G.: Intention and behavior: a Bayesian meta-analysis with focus on the Ajzen-Fishbein Model in the field of environmental behavior. Qual. Quant. 43(5), 743-755 (2009).
28. Snijders T. A. B.: Models for longitudinal network data. Chapter 11. In: Carrington, P., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds.) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 215-247. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005).
29. Terpsiadou M. H., Economides A. A.: The use of information systems in the Greek public financial services: the case of TAXIS. Govt. Inf. Q. 26(3), 468-476 (2009).
30. van de Wijngaert, L., Brinkkemper, S., Bouwman, H.: The development and validation of a Web-based knowledge infrastructure for multi-theory, multi-method literature research the IS domain. Paper presented at the international conference on multidisciplinary information sciences and technologies, Mérida, Spain, 25-28 October 2006.
31. van de Wijngaert, L., Vermaas, K., Brinkkemper, S., Bouwman, H.: Accumulating is theories using a network approach towards meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 16th European conference on information systems, Galway, Ireland, 9-11 June 2008.
32. Venkatesh V., Davis F. D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186-204 (2000).
33. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425-478 (2003).
34. Wasserman S., Faust K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994).
35. *. Psychometrika 61(3), 401-425 (1996).
36. West D. M.: E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm. Rev. 64(1), 15-27 (2004).