Coppers context, and conjoints: A reassessment of TAM

Journal of Information Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 186-201

  Bouwman, Harry ^a,b,d   Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

IT diffusion and adoption; Mobile computing; Questionnaire surveys; User acceptance of IT

Indexed keywords

EID: 67049144731     PISSN: 02683962     EISSN: 14664437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jit.2008.36     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22(5): 453-474.
3. Amberg, M., Hirschmeier, M. and Wehrmann, J. (2004). The Compass Acceptance Model for the Analysis and Evaluation of Mobile Services, International Journal Mobile Communications 2(3): 248-259.
4. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411-423.
5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1): 74-94.
6. Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 211-218.
7. Bouwman, H. and Van de Wijngaert, L. (2002). Content and Context: A new research approach to the basic characteristics of information needs, New Media and Society 4(3): 329-354.
8. Bouwman, H. and Van de Wijngaert, L. (2003). E-commerce in Context: Policy capturing and customer value, 16th Bled Conference on eTransformation. Bled.
9. Bouwman, H., Van den Hooff, B., Van de Wijngaert, L. and Van Dijk, J.A. (2005). Information and Communication Technology in Organizations, London: Sage.
10. Carlson, J.R. and Zmud, R. (1999). Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions, Academy of Management Journal 42(2): 153-170.
11. Chen, G. and Kotz, D. (2000). A Survey of Context Aware Mobile Computing Research. Dartmouth, Computer Science Technical Report TR 2000-2381.
12. Cyr, D., Head, M. and Ivanov, A. (2006). Design Aesthetics Leading to m- Loyalty in Mobile Commerce, Information & Management 43: 950-963.
13. Daft, R. and Lengel, R. (1984). Information Richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design, in L. Cummings and B. Staw (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 191-233.
14. Daft, R. and Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science 32(5): 554-571.
15. D'Ambra, J., Rice, R.E. and O'Connor, M. (1998). Computer-Mediated Communication and Media Preference, Behaviour & Information Technology 17(3): 164-174.
16. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13: 319-340.
17. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive structuration theory, Organization Science 5(2): 121-147.
18. Dishawa, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs, Information & Management 36(1): 9-21.
19. Elias, M. (1997). Onder dienders: onstuimig en beklemmend: de wereld van de politie, Uitgeverij Balans.
20. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.
22. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. and Steinfield, C.W. (1990). A Social Influence Model of Technology Use, in J. Fulk and C.W. Steinfield (eds.) Organizations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 117-142.
23. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly 19(2): 213-236.
24. Gustafsson, J., Hermann, A. and Huber, F. (2003). Conjoint Analysis as an Instrument of Market Research Practice, in J. Gustafsson, A. Hermann and F. Huber (eds.) Conjoint measurement, methods and applications, Berlin: Springer, pp. 5-46.
25. Hoogenboezem, J. and Hoogenboezem, D. (2006). Coping with Targets: Performance measurement in The Netherlands police, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(7): 568-578.
26. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis, Techniques and Applications, London: Erlbaum.
27. Ilie, V., van Slyke, C, Green, G. and Lou, H. (2005). Gender Differences in Perceptions and Use of Communication Technologies: A diffusion of innovation approach, Information Processing Mangement Journal 18(3): 13-31.
28. Jonge, E. (2003). Evaluatie Project PWIG, Technisch Rapport. Regiopolitie Groningen Dienst Bedrijfsvoering.
29. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International.
30. Kleijnen, M., de Ruyter, K. and Wetzels, M. (2004). Consumer Adoption of Wireless Services: Discovering the rules while playing the game, Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(2): 51-61.
31. Kool, R., Hoogstraten, J., Dunnen den, M. and Koning, W. (2003). Implementatieleidraad 1.0., Technisch Rapport, September 2003.
32. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003). Why do People use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model, Information & Management 40(3): 191-204.
33. López-Nicolas, C, Molina Castillo, F. and Bouwman, H. (2008). An Assessment of Advanced Mobile Services Acceptance: Contributions from tarn and diffusion theory models, Information & Management 45(6), September 2008, 359-364.
34. Louviere, J.J. (1988). Analyzing Decision Making. Metric Conjoint Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage.
35. Lu, J., Yao, J. and Yu, C. (2005). Personal Innovativeness, Social Influence and Adoption of Wireless Internet Services via Mobile Technology, Journal of Strategic Information 14: 245-268.
36. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., Liu, C. and Yao, J. (2003). Technology Acceptance model for Wireless Internet, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13(3): 206-222.
37. Mao, E., Srite, M., Thatcher, J. and Yaprak, O. (2005). A Research Model for Mobile Phone Service Behaviors: Empirical validation in the U.S. and Turkey, Journal of Global Information Technology Management 8(4): 7-28.
38. Molin, E. (1999). Conjoint modeling approaches for residential group preferences, Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.
39. Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of E-commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3): 101-134.
40. Pedersen, P.E. and Ling, R. (2002). Mobile End-user Service Adoption Studies: A selective review, Paper submitted to Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems.
41. Pica, D. and Sorensen, C. (2004). On Mobile Technology in Context: Exploring police work, Journal of Computing and Information Technology 12: 287-295.
42. Poole, M. and DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The theory of adaptive structuration, in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (eds.) Organisations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 173-193.
43. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, New York: The Free Press.
44. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn., New York: The Free Press.
45. Rossi, P.H. and Anderson, A.B. (1982). The Factorial Survey Approach: An introduction, in P.H. Rossi and S.L. Nock (eds.) Measuring Social Judgments, Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 15-67.
46. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model: Investigating subjective norm and moderating effects, Information & Management 44: 90-103.
47. Schilit, A., Adams, N. and Want, R. (1994). Context aware Computing Applications, in Proceedings of IEEE workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz: IEEE Computer Society Press, 85-90.
48. Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use, Communication Research 18(4): 487-523.
49. Sorensen, C. and Pica, D. (2005). Tales from the Police: Rhythms of interaction with mobile technologies, Information and Organization 15: 125-149.
50. Steen, M. (2008). The Fragility of Human-Centred Design, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
51. Stijnman, G., Lugard, F., Slotema, M. and Lith, M. (2004). Evaluatie Pilot Mobiel Blauw, Technisch Rapport. Regiopolitie Amsterdam Amstelland.
52. Stol, W.Ph., van Wijk, A.Ph., Vogel, G., Foederer, B. and van Heel, L. (2004). Politiestraatwerk in Nederland: Noodhulp en Gebiedswerk, [Police streetwork in The Netherlands]. Apeldoorn/Zeist: Nederlandse Politie Academie/ Kerkebosch.
53. Suh, B. and Han, I. (2003). The Impact of Customer Trust and Perception of Security Control on the Acceptance of Electronic Commerce, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3), Spring 2003, 135.
54. Tapia, A. and Sawyer, S. (2005). Beliefs About Computing: Contrary evidence from a study of mobile computing use among criminal justice personnel, in C. S0rensen, Y. Yoo, K. Lyytinnen and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Designing ubiquitous information environments: socio-technical issues and challenges, New York: Springer.
55. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage - a Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research 6(2): 144-176.
56. Tyre, M.J. and Orlikowski, WJ. (1994). Windows of Opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organization Science 5(1): 98-118.
57. Van de Wijngaert, L. (1999). Information Needs and New Media Choice, Enschede: Utrecht University/Telematica Instituut.
58. Van de Wijngaert, L. and Bouwman, H. (2009). Would You share? Predicting the potential use of a new technology, Telematics & Informatics 26(1): 85-102.
59. Van den Hooff, B. (1994). Incorporating Electronic Mail, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Publisher.
60. Van der Heijden, H. (2003). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 28(4): 695-704.
61. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46(2): 186-204.
62. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. and Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Towards a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-477.
63. Vriens, M. (1995). Conjoint Analysis in marketing. Developments in stimulus representation and segmentation methods, Groningen: Groningen University.
64. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A relational perspective, Communication Research 19(1): 52-90.