Independent processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Li, Qi ^a   Nan, Weizhi ^a,b   Wang, Kai ^a,b   Liu, Xun ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMENSIONAL OVERLAP MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RESPONSE TIME; SIMON TASK; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STIMULUS RESPONSE CONFLICT; STIMULUS STIMULUS CONFLICT; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; TAXONOMY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROOP TEST;

EID: 84895882253     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089249     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Yamaguchi M, Proctor RW (2012) Multidimensional vector model of stimulus-response compatibility. Psychol Rev 119: 272-303.
2. Kerzel D, Buetti S (2012) Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: A comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychon Bull Rev 19: 456-461.
3. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643-662.
4. MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109: 163-203.
5. Simon JR (1990) The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing, in Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Proctor RW, Reeve TG, Editors. North-Holland: Oxford England. 31-86.
6. Proctor RW, Reeve TG (1990) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Oxford England: North-Holland.
7. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16: 143-149.
8. Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9: 353-383.
9. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological review 97: 253-270.
10. Egner T, Delano M, Hirsch J (2007) Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 35: 940-948. (Pubitemid 46400544)
11. Simon JR, Small AM (1969) Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology 53: 433-435.
12. Kornblum S (1994) The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop-and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research 56: 130-135.
13. Kornblum S, Stevens GT, Whipple A, Requin J (1999) The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 688-714.
14. Liu X, Park Y, Gu X, Fan J (2010), Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72: 1710-1720.
15. Simon JR, Berbaum K (1990) Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect.'. Acta Psychologica 73(2): 159-170.
16. Egner T (2008) Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 374-380.
17. Akçay Ç, Hazeltine E (2011) Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychon Bull Rev 18: 505-511.
18. Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J, Humphreys G (2010) Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36: 147-161.
19. Kim C, Chung C, Kim J (2012) Conflict adjustment through domain-specific multiple cognitive control mechanisms. Brain Res 1444: 55-64.
20. Fruhholz S, Godde B, Finke M, Herrmann M (2011) Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict task. Neuroimage 54: 622-634.
21. Fan J, Flombaum JI, McCandliss BD, Thomas KM, Posner MI (2003) Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage 18: 42-57. (Pubitemid 36062746)
22. Wang K, Mecklinger A, Hofmann J, Weng X (2010) From orthography to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience 165: 101-106.
23. Augustinova M, Flaudias V, Ferrand L (2010) Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect. Psychon Bull Rev 17(6): 827-33.
24. Luo CR (1999) Semantic competition as the basis of Stroop interference: Evidence from color-word matching tasks. Psychological Science 10: 35-40.
25. Sternberg S (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica 30: 276-315.
26. Liu X, Banich MT, Jacobson BL, Tanabe JL (2004) Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 22: 1097-1106. (Pubitemid 38829198)
27. Sturz BR, Green ML, Locker L, Boyer TW (2013) Stroop interference in a delayed match-to-sample task: evidence for semantic competition. Front Psychol 4: 842.
28. De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 731-750.
29. Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 134-140.
30. Ullsperger M, Bylsma LM, Botvinick MM (2005) The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 5: 467-472.
31. Wang K, Li Q, Zheng Y, Wang H, Liu X (2013) Temporal and spectral profiles of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict processing. Neuroimage: In press.
32. Torres-Quesada M, Funes MJ, Lupianez J (2013) Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychol 142: 203-210.
33. Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J, Humphreys G (2010) Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition 114: 338-347.
34. Jiang J, Egner T (2013) Using Neural Pattern Classifiers to Quantify the Modularity of Conflict-Control Mechanisms in the Human Brain. Cerebral Cortex : In press.
35. Kim C, Kroger JK, Kim J (2011) A Functional Dissociation of Conflict Processing Within Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Human Brain Mapping 32: 304-312.
36. Kim C, Chung C, Kim J (2010) Multiple cognitive control mechanisms associated with the nature of conflict. Neurosci Lett 476: 156-160.
37. Milham MP, Banich M T, Webb A, Barad V, Cohen NJ, et al. (2001) The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 12: 467-473. (Pubitemid 33022701)
38. Wang H, Fan J (2007) Human attentional networks: A connectionist model. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 1678-1689. (Pubitemid 47547870)
39. Stuss DT, Floden D, Alexander MP, Levine B, Katz D (2001) Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 39: 771-786. (Pubitemid 32454998)