Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?

Obesity

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 638-644

  Wing, Rena R ^a   Leahey, Tricia ^a   Jeffery, Robert ^b   Johnson, Karen C ^c   Hill, James O ^d   Coday, Mace ^c   Espeland, Mark A ^e  

^a MIRIAM HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d Anschutz Health and Wellness Center   (United States)

^e WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BODY MASS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; THERAPY EFFECT; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

HARNESS;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS INDEX; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; OVERWEIGHT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT LOSS; WEIGHT REDUCTION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84895811618     PISSN: 19307381     EISSN: 1930739X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20526     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH,. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 370-379.
2. Wing RR, Jeffery RW,. Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67: 132-138.
3. Gorin A, et al. Involving support partners in obesity treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73: 341-343.
4. Gorin AA, et al. Weight loss treatment influences untreated spouses and the home environment: evidence of a ripple effect. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 1678-1684.
5. Leahey TM, et al. Temmates and social influence affect weight loss outcomes in a team-based weight loss competition. Obesity, 2012; 20: 1413-1418.
6. Wing RR., Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. n Handbook of Obesity Treatment, Bray GA, Bouchard C, Editors. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2008. p 227-248.
7. Heshka S, et al. Weight loss with self-help compared with a structured commercial program: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 1792-1798.
8. Renjilian DA, et al. Individual versus group therapy for obesity: effects of matching participants to their treatment preferences. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 717-721.
9. Fabricatore AN, et al. Predictors of attrition and weight loss success: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther 2009; 47: 685-691.
10. Levine J, Moreland, R., Small groups. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G, Editors. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998. p 415-469.
11. O'Dell JW,. Group size and emotional interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 1968; 8: 75-78.
12. Jeffery RW, Snell MK, Forster JL,. Group composition in the treatment of obesity: does increasing group homogeneity improve treatment results? Behav Res Ther 1985; 23: 371-373.
13. Simon GE, et al. Is success in weight loss treatment contagious (Do attendance and outcomes cluster within treatment groups)? Obes Res Clin Pract 2010; 4: 283-291.
14. Murray D., Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
15. Ryan DH, et al. Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Control Clin Trials 2003; 24: 610-628.
16. Bray G,. et al. Baseline characteristics of the randomised cohort from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2006; 3: 202-215.
17. Wadden TA, et al. The Look AHEAD study: a description of the lifestyle intervention and the evidence supporting it. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14: 737-752.
18. Hertel G, Kerr NL, Messe LA,. Motivation gains in performance groups: paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Kohler effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 79: 580-601.
19. Köhler O,. Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion [Human physical performance in groups and conditions for optimal collective performance]. Industrielle Psychotechnik 1927; 4: 209-226.
20. Feltz DL, Kerr NL, Irwin BC, Buddy up: the Kohler effect applied to health games. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2011; 33: 506-526.
21. Irwin BC, et al. Aerobic exercise is promoted when individual performance affects the group: a test of the Kohler motivation gain effect. Ann Behav Med 2012; 44: 151-159.
22. Osborn KA, et al. The Köhler effect: motivation gains and losses in real sports groups. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol 2012; 1: 242-253.
23. Foreyt JP, Goodrick GK, Gotto AM,. Limitations of behavioral treatment of obesity: review and analysis. J Behav Med 1981; 4: 159-174.
24. Evans CR, Dion KL,. Group cohesion and performance: a metaanalysis. Small Group Res 1991; 22: 175-186.
25. Maznevski M,. Understanding our differences: performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Hum Relat 1994; 47: 531-552.