Evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity of aquifers with piles;Evaluation de la conductivité hydrauliques des aquifères avec des pieux

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 371-382

  Ma, Lei ^a   Xu, Ye Shuang ^a   Shen, Shui Long ^a   Sun, Wen Juan ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Equivalent hydraulic conductivity; Equivalent medium theory (EMT); Heterogeneity; Hydraulic properties; Laboratory experiments measurements

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; HETEROGENEITY; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; PILE; SANDY SOIL;

EID: 84895757559     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-013-1068-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ASTM (2006) ASTM D 4254: standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM (2009) ASTM D7263: standard test methods for laboratory determination of density (unit weight) of soil specimens. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. ASTM (2012) ASTM D698: standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
4. Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Bedient PB, Rifai HS, Newell CJ (1999) Groundwater contamination: transport and remediation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New York.
6. Begg SH, King PR (1985) Modeling the effects of shales on reservoir performance: calculation of effective vertical permeability. SPE Paper no. 13529, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, pp 331-445.
7. Bunn MI, Jones JP, Endres AL, Rudolph DL (2010) Effects of hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity on vadose zone response to pumping in an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 387(1-2): 90-104.
8. Carlson MA, Lohse KA, Jennifer C, McIntosh JC, McLain JET (2011) Impacts of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial basin. J Hydrol 409(1-2): 196-211.
9. Chai JC, Agung PMA, Hino T, Igaya Y, Cater JP (2011) Estimating hydraulic conductivity from piezocone soundings. Geotechnique 61(8): 699-708.
10. Chen JJ, Zhang LY, Zhang JF, Zhu YF, Wang JH (2013) Field tests, modification, and application of deep soil mixing method in soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(1): 24-34.
11. Dagan G (1979) Models of groundwater flow in statistically homogeneous porous formations. Water Resour Res 15(1): 47-63.
12. Desbarats AJ (1992) Spatial averaging of hydraulic conductivity in three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media. Math Geol 24(3): 249-267.
13. Ding GP, Jiao JJ, Zhang DX (2008) Modelling study on the impact of deep building foundations on the groundwater system. Hydrol Process 22(12): 1857-1865.
14. Frippiat CC, Holeyman AE (2008) A comparative review of upscaling methods for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. J Hydrol 362(1-2): 150-176.
15. Horpibulsuk S, Yangsukaseam N, Chinkulkijniwat A, Du YJ (2011) Compressibility and permeability of Bangkok clay compared with kaolinite and bentonite. Appl Clay Sci 52(1-2): 150-159.
16. Huang J, Han J, Oztoprak S (2009) Coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(8): 1011-1021.
17. Jiao JJ, Leung CM, Ding GP (2008) Changes to the groundwater system, from 1888 to present, in a highly-urbanized coastal area in Hong Kong, China. Hydrogeol J 16(8): 1527-1539.
18. Jiao JJ, Wang XS, Nandy S (2006) Preliminary assessment of the impacts of deep foundations and land reclamation on groundwater flow in a coastal area in Hong Kong, China. Hydrogeol J 14(1-2): 100-114.
19. Powrie W, Preene M (1994) Time-drawdown behavior of construction dewatering systems in fine soils. Geotechnique 44(1): 83-100.
20. Ranjan S, Mysore SN, Kenneth LM, Gordon PB (2008) Investigations of pile foundations in brownfields. J Geotech Geoenviron 134(10): 562-572.
21. Roberts TOL, Preene M (1994) The design of groundwater control systems using the observational method. Geotechnique 44(4): 727-734.
22. Shen SL, Xu YS (2011) Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can Geotech J 48(9): 1378-1392.
23. Tan Y, Li MW (2011) Measured performance of a 26 m deep top-down excavation in downtown Shanghai. Can Geotech J 48(5): 704-719.
24. Tan Y, Wei B (2012) Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation constructed by cut-and-cover technique in Shanghai soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron 137(1): 69-88.
25. Wang JP, Xu YS, Ma L, Shen SL (2013) An approach to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of soil based on CPTU test. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 31(3): 242-253. doi: 10. 1080/1064119X. 2012. 676154.
26. Wen XH, Gomez-Hernandez JJ (1996) Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: an overview. J Hydrol 183(1-2): ix-xxxii.
27. Xu YS, Ma L, Shen SL, Sun WJ (2012) Evaluation of land subsidence by considering underground structures penetrated into aquifers of Shanghai. Hydrogeol J 20(8): 1623-1634.
28. Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ (2009) Geological and hydrogeological environment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance of infrastructures. Eng Geol 109(3-4): 241-254.
29. Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ, Chai JC, Horpibulsuk S (2013) Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multi-aquifer-aquitard groundwater system. Nat Hazards 66(2): 731-748. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-012-0512-y.
30. Zeng LL, Hong ZS, Cai YQ, Han J (2011) Change of hydraulic conductivity during compression of undisturbed and remolded clays. Appl Clay Sci 51(1-2): 86-93.