An Approach to Evaluate Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Based on CPTU Test

Marine Georesources and Geotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 242-253

  Wang, Jun Peng ^a   Xu, Ye Shuang ^a   Ma, Lei ^a   Shen, Shui Long ^a  

^a Shanghai Jiao Tong University   (China)

Author keywords

angle of cone tip; bi linear relation; CPTU; hydraulic conductivity

Indexed keywords

ANGLE OF CONE TIP; BI-LINEAR RELATION; CONE PENETRATION TESTS; CPTU; MODIFIED EQUATION; PIEZOCONE SOUNDING; PORE WATER PRESSURE RATIOS; SPHERICAL CAVITY EXPANSION;

PILES; PORE PRESSURE; PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SOILS; WATER;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

CONE PENETRATION TEST; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PORE PRESSURE; POREWATER; SOIL TEST;

EID: 84877286757     PISSN: 1064119X     EISSN: 15210618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2012.676154     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Burns, S. E. and P. W. Mayne. 1998. Monotonic and dilatory pore pressure decay during piezocone tests in clay. Can. Geotech. J. 35 (6): 1063-1073.
2. Campanella, R. G. and P. K. Robertson. 1988. Current status of the piezocone test. In: Penetration testing. Ruiter, J. (ed.), 93-116. Rotterdam: Balkema.
3. Cetin, K. Q. and C. Ozan. 2009. CPT-based probabilistic soil characterization and classification. J. Geotech. Geoenvironment. Engng. 135 (11): 84-107.
4. Chai, J. C., P. M. A. Agung, T. Hino, Y. Igaya, and J. P. Cater. 2011. Estimating hydraulic conductivity from piezocone soundings. Géotechnique 61 (8): 699-708.
5. Chai, J. C., N. Miura, and S. L. Shen. 2002. Performance of embankments with and without reinforcement on soft subsoil. Can. Geotech. J. 39(4): 838-848.
6. Clarke, B. J., J. P. Cater, and C. P. Wroth. 1979. In situ determination of the consolidation characteristics of saturated clays. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, British Geotechnical Society, London, 2, pp. 207-227.
7. Cleary, M. P. 1977. Fundamental solutions for a fluid-saturated porous solid. Int. J. Solids Structures 13 (9): 785-806.
8. Danziger, F. A. B., M. S. S. Almeida, and G. C. Sills. 1997. The significance of the strain path analysis in the interpretation of piezocone dissipation data. Géotechnique 47 (5): 901-914.
9. Douglas, B. J. and R. S. Olsen. 1981. Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer, cone penetration testing and experience. Proceedings of the ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, ASCE, pp. 209-227.
10. Elsworth, D. 1991. Dislocation analysis of penetration in saturated porous media. J. Engng. Mech Div. 117 (2): 391-408.
11. Elsworth, D. and D. S. Lee. 2005. Permeability determination from on-the-fly piezocone sounding. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng. 131 (5): 643-653.
12. Elsworth, D. and D. S. Lee. 2007. Limits in determining permeability from on-the-fly uCPT sounding. Géotechnique 57 (8): 679-685.
13. Gupta, R. C. and J. L. Davidson. 1986. Piezocone determined coefficient of consolidation. Soils and Foundation 26 (3): 12-22.
14. International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ISSMFE). 1989. International reference test procedure for cone penetration test (CPT). Report of the ISSMFE Technical Committee on Penetration Testing of Soils-TC 16, with Reference to Test Procedures, Information 7. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Institute. pp. 6-16.
15. Ladanyi, B. 1961. Discussion. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Soil Mech., Paris 3, 270-271.
16. Lu, Q., M. F. Randolph, Y. Hu, and C. A. Bugarski. 2004. Numerical study of cone penetration in clay. Géotechnique 54 (4): 257-267.
17. Lunne, T., P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell. 1997. Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. London: E & FN Spon.
18. Mitchell, J. K. and T. L. Brandon. 1998. Analysis and use of CPT in earthquake and environmental engineering. Geotechnical Site Characterization, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Site Characterization, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1. Mayne, P.W., and P.K. Robertson (eds.) pp. 69-96.
19. Randolph, M. F. and C. P. Wroth. 1979. An analytical solution for the consolidation around a driven pile. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 3 (3): 217-229.
20. Robertson, P. K. 1990. Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can. Geotech. J. 27 (1): 151-158.
21. Robertson, P. K., J. P. Sully, D. J. Woeller, T. Lunne, J. J. M. Powell, and D. G. Gillespie. 1992. Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone test. Can. Geotech. J. 29 (4): 539-550.
22. Shen, S. L., J. Han, and Y. J. Du. 2008. Deep mixing induced property changes in surrounding sensitive marine clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng, ASCE 134 (6): 845-854.
23. Shen, S. L., J. P. Wang, and L. Ma. 2010. Identification of soil stratigraphy of soft deposit in Shanghai from CPTU test. Soil Behavior and Geo-Micromechanics, Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010, ASCE. Meier, R., Abbo, A., and Wang, L. B. (eds.), pp. 384-391.
24. Shen, S. L. and Y. S. Xu. 2011. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 48 (9): 1378-1392.
25. Shen, S. L., Y. S. Xu, and Z. S. Hong. 2006. Estimation of land subsidence based on groundwater flow model. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 24 (2): 149-167.
26. Sully, J. P., P. K. Robertson, R. G. Campanella, and D. J. Woeller. 1999. An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils. Can. Geotech. J. 36 (2): 369-381.
27. Vesic, A. S. 1973. Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. J. Soil Mech. Fdn Engng Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs. 99, SM1: 45-73.
28. Wroth, C. P. 1984. The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique 34 (4): 449-89.
29. Xu, Y. S., S. L. Shen, and Y. J. Du. 2009. Geological and hydrogeological environment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance of infrastructures. Engineering Geology 109 (3-4): 241-254.
30. Yasufuku, N. and A. F. L. Hyde. 1995. Pile end-bearing capacity in crushable sands. Géotechnique 45 (4): 663-676.