Delayed perforation: A hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 220-227

  Inoue, Takuya ^a,b   Uedo, Noriya ^a   Yamashina, Takeshi ^a   Yamamoto, Sachiko ^a   Hanaoka, Noboru ^a   Takeuchi, Yoji ^a   Higashino, Koji ^a   Ishihara, Ryu ^a   Iishi, Hiroyasu ^a   Tatsuta, Masaharu ^a   Takahashi, Hidenori ^a   Eguchi, Hidetoshi ^a,c   Ohigashi, Hiroaki ^a  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL CENTER FOR CANCER AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

complication; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); non ampullary duodenal tumor; perforation

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR CLOTTING; DUODENUM TUMOR; EMERGENCY SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; FEMALE; GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROPERITONEAL ABSCESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL INTESTINE PERFORATION; VATER PAPILLA;

COMPLICATION; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION (EMR); ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD); NON-AMPULLARY DUODENAL TUMOR; PERFORATION;

ADULT; DUODENAL NEOPLASMS; DUODENUM; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUPTURE, SPONTANEOUS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84895444176     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/den.12104     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jepsen JM, Persson M, Jakobsen NO, et al. Prospective study of prevalence and endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of duodenal polyps in patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1994; 29: 483-487. (Pubitemid 24176432)
2. Cortese AF, Cornell GN,. Carcinoma of the duodenum. Cancer 1972; 29: 1010-1015.
3. Darling RC, Welch CE,. Tumors of the small intestine. N. Engl. J. Med. 1959; 260: 397-408.
4. Hirasawa R, Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Ishiguro S,. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic resection of duodenal adenocarcinomas and adenomas with the submucosal saline injection technique. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997; 46: 507-513. (Pubitemid 28018545)
5. Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB, Furth EE, Ginsberg GG,. Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: A study of 101 cases. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 55: 390-396. (Pubitemid 41115154)
6. Apel D, Jakobs R, Spiethoff A, Riemann JF,. Follow-up after endoscopic snare resection of duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 444-448. (Pubitemid 40668210)
7. Lépilliez V, Chemaly M, Ponchon T, Napoleon B, Saurin JC,. Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: An efficient technique with a substantial risk of delayed bleeding. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 806-810.
8. Alexander S, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Bailey A, Co J,. EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: Technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69: 66-73.
9. Abbass R, Rigaux J, Al-Kawas FH,. Nonampullary duodenal polyps: Characteristics and endoscopic management. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 71: 754-759.
10. Kedia P, Brensinger C, Ginsberg G,. Endoscopic predictors of successful endoluminal eradication in sporadic duodenal adenomas and its acute complications. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 1297-1301.
11. Fanning SB, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Chung A, Kariyawasam VC,. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: Endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: 805-812.
12. Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Ishihara R, et al. Efficacy of an endo-knife with a water-jet function (Flushknife) for endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 314-322.
13. Matsuda T, Fujii T, Emura F, et al. Complete closure of a large defect after EMR of a lateral spreading colorectal tumor when using a two-channel colonoscope. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 60: 836-838. (Pubitemid 39550953)
14. Hanaoka N, Uedo N, Ishihara R, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1112-1115.
15. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 1217-1225.
16. Tanaka S, Tamegai Y, Tsuda S, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano HO,. Multicenter questionnaire survey on the current situation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Dig. Endosc. 2010; 22: S2-8.
17. Shono T, Ishikawa K, Ochiai Y, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection: A new technique for en bloc resection of a large superficial tumor in the colon and rectum. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011; doi: 10.1155/2011/948293
18. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Goto O, Kodashima S, Koike K,. Safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by the trainee endoscopists. Dig. Endosc. 2012; 24: 154-158.
19. Ishihara R, Tanaka H, Iishi H, et al. Long-term outcome of esophageal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma without lymphovascular involvement after endoscopic resection. Cancer 2008; 112: 2166-2172. (Pubitemid 351628625)
20. Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N, et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008; 68: 1066-1072.
21. Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M, Hosokawa M, Kato M, Asaka M,. Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or deeper. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 387-390.
22. Jung JH, Choi KD, Ahn JY, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 133-135.
23. Nylund K, Hausken T, Odegaard S, Eide GE, Gilja OH,. Gastrointestinal wall thickness measured with transabdominal ultrasonography and its relationship to demographic factors in healthy subjects. Ultraschall. Med. 2012; 33: E225-232.
24. Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM,. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 2666-2677.
25. Hamanaka Y, Nishihara K, Hamasaki T, et al. Pancreatic juice output after pancreatoduodenectomy in relation to pancreatic consistency, duct size, and leakage. Surgery 1996; 119: 281-287. (Pubitemid 26082663)
26. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig. Endosc. 2009; 21: 270-274.
27. Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, et al. Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: A multicenter study in Japan. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007; 22: 1409-1414. (Pubitemid 47274585)
28. Krishna RP, Singh RK, Behari A, Kumar A, Saxena R, Kapoor VK,. Post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography perforation managed by surgery of percutaneous drainage. Surg. Today 2011; 41: 660-666.
29. Gubler C, Bauerfeind P,. Endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract perforations with the over-the-scope clip. Digestion 2012; 85: 302-307.
30. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246: 425-433 (Pubitemid 47312132)