Multicenter questionnaire survey on the current situation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 22, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Tanaka, Shinji ^a   Tamegai, Yoshiro ^b   Tsuda, Sumio ^c,g   Saito, Yutaka ^d   Yahagi, Naohisa ^e   Yamano, Hiro O ^f  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Konodai Hospital   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d TORANOMON HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital   (Japan)

^f AKITA RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^g Medical Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colorectal ESD; Colorectal tumor; Complication; Questionnaire survey; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCALPEL; SURGEON; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR PERFORATION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DISSECTION; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PROCEDURES; UTILIZATION;

COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DISSECTION; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; JAPAN; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 77952233238     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00952.x     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Tajiri H, Kitano S. Complication associated with endoscopic mucosal resection: definition of bleeding that can be viewed as accidental. Dig. Endosc. 2004 16 : S134 6.
2. Tsuda S. Complications related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colon and rectum and risk management procedures. Early Colorectal. Cancer 2006 10 : 539 550 (in Japanese with English abstract).
3. Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J. Gastroenterol. 2008 43 : 641 651 (Review).