Lesson study as a learning environment for coaches of mathematics teachers

Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education: Learning Together

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 153-164

  Knapp, Andrea ^a   Bomer, Megan ^b   Moore, Cynthia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b Illinois Central College   (United States)

^c ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895379200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). NSF graduate teaching fellows in K-12 education program. http://nsfgk12.org/. Accessed 19 April 2009.
2. Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2007). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In T. Lambert & L. Wieles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Stateline (Lake Tahoe): University of Nevada.
3. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
4. Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
5. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
6. Kwon, O. (2002). The effect of calculator-based ranger activities on students' graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 57-67.
7. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197-230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Moore, C. J. (2003). Partnership for research in science and mathematics education mission statement. Normal: Illinois State University, Biology Department.
9. National Science Foundation. (2004). Program solicitation: NSF 04-533. (2004). The National Science Foundation Web site. http://www.nsf.gov/home/ crssprgm/gk12. Accessed 30 September 2004.
10. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
11. Olson, J., & Barrett, J. (2004). Coaching teachers to implement mathematics reform recommendations. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 6, 63-78.
12. Olson, J., Colasanti, M., & Trujillo, K. (2006). Prompting growth for prospective teachers using cognitive dissonance. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 281-288). Prague: Charles University.
13. Presmeg, N., & Barrett, J. (2003). Lesson study characterized as a multi-tiered teaching experiment. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 47-54). Honolulu: PME.
14. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1-22.
15. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
16. Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometrical concepts. In R. Karplus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177-184). Berkeley: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science.