The Effect of Calculator-Based Ranger Activities on Students' Graphing Ability

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 57-67

  Kwon, Oh Nam ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40049095469     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17895.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barclay, W. L. (1985, November). Graphing misconceptions and possible remedies using microcomputer-based labs. Paper presented at the 7th National Educational Computing Conference, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.
2. Barclay, W. L. (1986, June). Graphing misconceptions and possible remedies using microcomputer-based labs. Paper presented at the 7th National Educational Computing Conference, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.
3. Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real_time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 385-395.
4. Cates, B. B. (2000). The effects of calculator-based laboratory activities on college algebra students' understanding of the function concept and graphing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University.
5. Clement, J. (1989). The concept of varation and misconceptions in Cartesian graphing. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(2), 77-86.
6. Dugdale, S. (1993). Perspective on student thinking. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter, (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 101-130. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Dunham, P. H., & Osborne, A. (1991). Learning how to see: Students' graphing difficulties. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 34-47.
8. Fey, J. T. (1984). Computer and mathematics: The impact on secondary school curriculums. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Goldenberg, P. E. (1987). Believing is seeing: How preconceptions influence the perception of graphs. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 197–204), Montreal.
10. Hale, P. L. (1996). Building conception and repairing misconceptions in student understanding of kinematic graphs: Using student discourse in calculator-based laboratories (Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, A3434.
11. Kieran, C. (1993). Function, graphing, and technology: Integrating research on learning and instruction. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 189-238. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Lew, H. C. (1999). New goals and direction for mathematics education in Korea. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 240-247. London: Falmer Press.
13. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
14. McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & Van Zee, E. H. (1987). Students' difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 503-513.
15. McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1984, April). Effect of laboratory activity and written simulations on the acquisition of graphing skills by eighth grade students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
16. McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 571-579.
17. Michael, T. S. (1995, April). Effect of microcomputer based laboratory on graphing interpretation skills and understanding of motion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
18. Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 369-383.
19. Monk, G. S. (1994). Students' understanding of function in calculus courses. Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 9, 21-27.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. Norman, F. A. (1993). Integrating research on teachers' knowledge of function and their graphs: Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 159-187. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. O'Callaghan, B. R. (1998). Computer-intensive algebra and students' conceptual knowledge of functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 21-40.
23. Trowbridge, D., & McDermott, L. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1020-1028.
24. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21, 14-23.