Whose Norms Prevail? Policy Networks, International Organizations and "Sustainable Forest Management"

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 170-184

  Gale, Fred ^a   Cadman, Timothy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Canada; criteria; forestry; governance; indicators; Montreal Process; norms; policy networks; sustainable

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895069178     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.840875     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Atkinson, M., and W. Coleman. 1989. Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 19: 47-67.
2. Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 1999. The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. Int. Organization 53: 699-732.
3. Bernstein, S., and B. Cashore. 2012. Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. Int. Affairs 88(3): 585-604.
4. Brand, D. 1997. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Biomass Bioenergy 13(4-5): 247-253.
5. Cadman, T. 2011. Quality and legitimacy of global governance: Case lessons from forestry. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Canadian Forest Service. 1994a. C&I science panel. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Forest Service.
7. Canadian Forest Service. 1994b. C&I steering committee (as of March 11, 1994). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Forest Service.
8. Canadian Forest Service. 1994c. C&I technical committee (as of March 11 1994). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Forest Service.
9. Cashore, B. 1997. Flights of the phoenix: Explaining the durability of the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber dispute. Canadian-American Public Policy No. 32. Orono, ME: Canadian-American Center, University of Maine.
10. Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing through markets. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Checkel, J. 2005. It's the process stupid: Process tracing in the study of European and international politics. Oslo, Norway: Centre for European Studies, Working Paper 26 (October).
12. Dellert, L. 1998. Sustained yield: Why has it failed to achieve sustainability? In The wealth of forests: Markets, regulation and sustainable forestry, ed. C. Tollefson, 255-277. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
13. Dimitrov, R. 2005. Hostage to norms: States, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environ. Polit. 5(4): 1-24.
14. Elliott, C. 1999. Forest certification: Analysis from a policy network perspective. PhD dissertation, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
15. Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. Int. Organization 52: 887-917.
16. Florini, A. 1996. The evolution of international norms. Int. Stud. Q. 40(3): 363-389.
17. Food, and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013. The development of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w4345e/w4345e0c.htm (accessed 29 August 2013).
18. Forest Stewardship Council. 2012. Principles and criteria for forest stewardship. https://ic.fsc.org/principles-and-criteria.34.htm (accessed 29 August 2013).
19. Gale, F., and M. Haward. 2011. Global commodity governance: State responses to sustainable forest and fisheries certification. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conserv. Biol. 8: 27-38.
21. Gulbrandsen, L. 2004. Overlapping public and private governance: Can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environ. Polit. 4(2): 75-99.
22. Gulbrandsen, L. 2010. Transnational environmental governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
23. Howlett, M. 2001. Introduction: Policy regimes and policy change in the Canadian forest sector. In Canadian forest policy: Adapting to change, ed. M. Howlett, 3-22. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
24. Howlett, M. 2002. Do networks matter? Can. J. Polit. Sci. 35: 235-267.
25. Howlett, M., and J. Rayner. 1995. Do ideas matter? Policy network configurations and resistance to policy change in the Canadian forest network. Can. Public. Admin. 38(3): 382-410.
26. Humphreys, D. 1996. Forest politics: The evolution of international cooperation. London: Earthscan.
27. Humphreys, D. 2006. Logjam: Deforestation and the crisis of global governance. London: Earthscan.
28. Katzenstein, P. 1976. International relations and domestic structures: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Int. Organization 30: 1-45.
29. Marsh, D. 1998. Comparing policy networks: public policy and management. London: Open University Press.
30. Maser, C. 1990. The redesigned forest. Toronto, ON, Canada: Stoddart.
31. Meidinger, E. 2003. Forest certification as a global civil society regulatory institution. In Social and political dimensions of forest certification, ed. F. Meidinger, C. Elliott, and G. Oesten, 265-289. Remagen-Oberwinter, Germany: Forstbuch.
32. Ministerial Conference for the Protection of Forests in Europe. 2001. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management for the MCPFE: Review of development and current status. Vienna, Austria: MCPFE Liaison Unit.
33. Montreal Process Working Group. 1994a. Report of Delhi, India meeting of July 28. http://www.montrealprocess.org/Resources/Meeting_Reports/Working_Group/2_e.shtml (accessed 29 August 2013).
34. Montreal Process Working Group. 1994b. Report of Hull, Canada meeting of October 15. http://www.montrealprocess.org/Resources/Meeting_Reports/Working_Group/4_e.shtml (accessed 29 August 2013).
35. Montreal Process Working Group. 1994c. Report of Olympia, Washington meeting of September 9. http://www.montrealprocess.org/Resources/Meeting_Reports/Working_Group/3_e.shtml (accessed 29 August 2013).
36. Montreal Process Working Group. 1994d. Report of Ottawa, Canada meeting of July 5 1994. http://www.montrealprocess.org/Resources/Meeting_Reports/Working_Group/1_e.shtml (accessed 29 August 2013).
37. Montreal Protocol Working Group. 1995. Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. Santiago, Chile Meeting, 3 February. http://www.montrealprocess.org/Resources/Meeting_Reports/Working_Group/6_e.shtml (accessed 29 August 2013).
38. Nagtzaam, G. 2009. The making of international environmental treaties: Neoliberal and constructivist analyses of normative evolution. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
39. Nazi, R., and P. Frost. 2009. Sustainable forest management in the tropics: Is everything in order but the patient still dying? Ecol. Soc. 14: 2.
40. Pralle, S. 2007. Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
41. Putnam, R. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. Int. Organization 42(3): 427-460.
42. Riley, L. F. 1995. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada. Water Air Soil Pollut. 82: 67-70.
43. Tollefson, C., F. Gale, and D. Haley. 2008. Setting the standard: Governance, certification and the Forest Stewardship Council. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
44. United Nations General Assembly. 1992. Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-3annex3.htm (accessed 29 August 2013).
45. United Nations General Assembly. 2007. Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests. http://www.un.org/esa/forests/pdf/ERes2007_40E.pdf (accessed 29 August 2013).
46. van Beuren, L., and E. Blom. 1997. Hierarchical framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management standards. Leiden, the Netherlands: The Tropenbos Foundation.
47. Wilson, J. 1998. Talk and log. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
48. Winter, M. 1996. Rural politics: Policies for agriculture, forestry and the environment. London: Routledge.