Testing measurement invariance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pain behaviors score between the US general population sample and a sample of individuals with chronic pain

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 239-244

  Chung, Hyewon ^a   Kim, Jiseon ^b   Cook, Karon F ^c   Askew, Robert L ^b   Revicki, Dennis A ^d   Amtmann, Dagmar ^b  

^a Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential item functioning; Item response theory; Multi group confirmatory factor analysis; Pain measurement; Patient outcome measures; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; ETHNOLOGY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHRONIC PAIN; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895063543     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0463-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Fordyce, W. E. (1976). Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
2. Keefe, F. J., Williams, D. A., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Assessment of pain behaviors. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 170-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3. Waters, S. J., Dixon, K. E., Keefe, F. J., Ayers, S., Baum, A., McManus, C., et al. (2007). Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (2nd ed., pp. 300-303). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Hadjistavropoulos, T., Herr, K., Turk, D. C., Fine, P. G., Dworkin, R., Helme, R., et al. (2007). An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on assessment of pain in older persons. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 23(1 Suppl), S1-S43. (Pubitemid 46006259)
5. Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Revicki, D. A., Harding, G., Burke, L. B., Cella, D., et al. (2008). Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: An IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain, 137(2), 276-285. (Pubitemid 351853291)
6. Jensen, M. P. (1997). Validity of self-report and observational measures. In T. S. Jensen & J. A. Turner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th world congress on pain: Progress in pain research and management. Seattle, WA: IASP Press.
7. Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). Initial item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194.
8. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1-27.
9. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255.
10. French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 378-402. (Pubitemid 44126426)
11. King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1995). A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pencil measurements: A test of measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 643-651. (Pubitemid 126006443)
12. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
13. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
14. Stark, S., Chernshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292-1306. (Pubitemid 44747822)
15. Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 361-388. (Pubitemid 39332694)
16. Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552-566.
17. Choi, S. W., Cook, K. F., & Dodd, B. G. (1997). Parameter recovery for the partial credit model using MULTILOG. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1(2), 114-142.
18. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543.
19. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144.
20. Steenkamp, E. M. J., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90. (Pubitemid 128088455)
21. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 419-456.
23. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.
24. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. In Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
26. Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations. A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(1), 154-168.
27. Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London, England: Sage.
28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
29. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320-341. (Pubitemid 38874703)
30. Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006). The search for "optimal" cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 267-288. (Pubitemid 44757331)
31. Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1-30.
32. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques: DIFdetect and difwithpar. Medical Care, 44(Suppl 3), S115-S123. (Pubitemid 44632037)
33. Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation Department of National Defense.
34. Crane, P. K., Van Belle, G., & Larson, E. B. (2004). Test bias in a cognitive test: Differential item functioning in the CASI. Statistics in Medicine, 23(2), 241-256. (Pubitemid 38100638)
35. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L., Ocepek-Weiklson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., et al. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 69-84. (Pubitemid 47036918)
36. Cook, K. F., Bombardier, C. H., Bamer, A. M., Choi, S. W., Kroenke, K., & Fann, J. R. (2011). Do somatic and cognitive symptoms of traumatic brain injury confound depression screening?. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 818-823.
37. Revicki, D. A., Chen, W., Harnam, N., Cook, K. F., Amtmann, D., Callahan, L. F., et al. (2009). Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank. Pain, 146(1-2), 158-169.
38. Liu, H. H., Cella, D., Gershon, R., Shen, J., Morales, L. S., Riley, W., et al. (2010). Representativeness of the PROMIS internet panel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1169-1178.
39. Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. H., Crane, P. K., et al. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: An overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 121-132. (Pubitemid 47036915)
40. Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471-492. (Pubitemid 41311764)
41. Yen, W. M. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3), 187-213.
42. Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1996). Uses of item response theory and the testlet concept in the measurement of psychopathology. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 81-97. (Pubitemid 126421255)