Mediation, mediators, and new intermediaries: Implications for the design of new communications policies

Media Diversity and Localism: Meaning and Metrics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 113-137

  Verhulst, Stefaan G ^a  

^a Markle Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894941965     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614407     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Retrieved January 22, 2005, from http://www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf
2. Adamic, L., & Huberman, B. (2000). Power law distribution of the World Wide Web (comment). Science, 287, 2115.
3. Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. (2003). Power to the edge. Command and control in the information age. CCRP. Retrieved March 26, 2005, from http://www.dodccrp.org/publications/pdf/Alberts_Power.pdf
4. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities:Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. (Rev. ed.). London: Verso.
5. Aufderheide, P. (1990). After the fairness doctrine: controversial broadcast programming and the public interest. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 47-72.
6. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
7. Bauer, J. M. (1999, September 25). Competition as a turbulent process: Lessons for telecommunications regulatory reform. (Paper presented at the 27th Telecommunications PolicyResearch Conference. Abstract retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://www.tprc.org/ABSTRACTS99/bauerpap.PDF
8. Bauer, J. M. (2004). Harnessing the swarm:Communications policy in an era of ubiquitous networks and disruptive technologies. Communications and Strategies, 54, 19-43.
9. Benkler, Y. (2000). From consumers to users: shifting the deeper structures of regulation towards sustainable commons and user access. 52 Fed. Comm. L.J. 561, 561-79. Retrieved April 7, 2005, from http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v52/no3/benkler1.pdf
10. Burke, D. (2005). Law as networked standard. Retrieved January 31, 2005, from http://islandia.law.yale.edu/isp/GlobalFlow/paper/Burk.pdf
11. Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Cherry, B. A. (2004, October 2). The telecommunications economy and regulation as coevolving complex adaptive systems: implications for federalism. Paper presented at the 32ndResearch Conference on Communications, Internet and Information Policy, Arlington, VA.
13. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Cohen, E. (Ed.). (2005). News incorporated: Corporate media ownership and its threat to democracy. New York: Prometheus Books.
15. Cooper, M. (2002). The failure of 'intermodal' competition in cable markets. Oxford, England: Consumer Federation of America.
16. Currie,D. (2004). RTS Fleming memorial lecture 2004: Television and the digital future. Oxford, England: Ofcom.
17. Dahlgreen, P. (1999). Public service media, old and new: Vitalizing a civic culture? [Electronic version]. Canadian Journal of Communication, 24.
18. Davenport,T., & Beck, J. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the newcurrency of business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Dennis, E. E. (2003). Prospects for a big idea: Is there a future for convergence? The International Journal on Media Management, 5, 7-11.
20. De Zengotita, T. (2005). Mediated: How the media shapes your world and the way you live in it. New York: Bloomsbury.
21. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
22. Eoyang, G., & Berkas, T. (1999). Evaluating performance in a complex adaptive system. In M. Lissack & H. Gunz (Eds.), Managing complexity in organizations (pp. 313-335).Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
23. Firestone, C. (1997). The new intermediaries. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
24. FitzGerald, F. (1979). America revised: History schoolbooks in the 20th century.New York:Vintage.
25. Gilder, G. (2000). Telecosm: How infinite bandwidth will revolutionize our world. New York: Free Press.
26. Gillmor, D (2004). We the media: grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. Retrieved November 24, 2004, from http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/wemedia/book/
27. Gitlin,T. (1980).The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the newleft. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown.
29. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
30. Goldberg, D., Prosser, T., & Verhulst, S. (1996). Consultant study on the impact of new communications technologies on media concentrations and pluralism. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
31. Goldberg,D., Prosser,T., & Verhulst, S. (1998). Legal responses to the changing media. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
32. Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). What's the right economy for cyberspace? First Monday, 2. Retrieved May 7, 2005, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue2_7/goldhaber/
33. Gordon, W. J. (1998) Intellectual property as price discrimination: Implications for contract. Kent Law Review, 73, 1367-1390.
34. Habermas, J. (1962). Struktarwandel der öffentlichkeit; Untersuchungen einer kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society]. (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
35. Hammer, M. (2000). The myth of disintermediation. InformationWeek Online. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from http://www.informationweek.com/794/94uwmh.htm
36. Hargittai E. (2000). Open portals or closed gates? Channeling content on the World Wide Web. Poetics, 27, 233-253.
37. Hargittai, E. (2003). The changing online landscape: From free-for-all to commercial fatekeeping. In P. Day & D. Schuler (Eds.), Community practice in the network society: Local actions/ global interaction (pp. 66-76). New York: Routledge.
38. Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1990). User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems. Management Science, 36, 739-764.
39. Hitchens, L. (1997). Introduction to the special feature on communications regulation: New patterns and problems. The Journal of Information, Law and Technology ( JILT), 1997 (3). Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/issue/1997_3/hitchen.htm
40. Holtz-Bacha,C., & Norris, P. (2001). "To entertain, inform, and educate:" Still the role of public television. Political Communication, 18, 123-140.
41. Hoynes,W. (2003). Branding public service: The "newPBS" and the privatization of public television. Television & New Media, 4, 117-130.
42. Introna, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the web:Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16, 1-17.
43. Johnson, S. (2005). Interface culture: How new technology transforms the way we create and communicate. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
44. Jordan, K., Hauser, J., & Foster, S. (2003). The augmented social network: Building identity and trust into the next-generation Internet. First Monday, 8. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_8/jordan/index.html
45. Kerr, E. B., & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic.
46. Laven, P. (2004). Standards, who needs them? Diffusion 2004/20. Geneva, Switzerland: European Broadcasting Union.
47. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: 11 channels of group life: Social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1, 145-146.
48. Longstaff, P. H. (2002). The communications toolkit how to build and regulate any communications business. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Longstaff, P. H. (2004). The puzzle of competition in the communications sector: can complex systems be regulated or managed? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Luhmann,N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes (pp. 172-192). London: Sage.
51. Mann, R. J., & Belzley, S. R., (2005). The promise of internet intermediary liability.William and Mary Law Review, 47, 239-308.
52. McKnight, L.W., Vaaler, P. M., & Katz, R. L. (2002). Creative destruction: Business survival strategies in the global internet economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail's mass communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Mowshowitz, A. (1982). The bias of computer technology. In W. M. Hoffman & J.M. Moore (Eds.), Ethics and the management of computer technology. Boston: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
55. Moyers,B. (2005,March 25).Welcome to doomsday.The New YorkReviewof Books, 52(5), 8-10.
56. Nielsen, J. (2003). IM, not IP (information pollution). ACM Queue, 1. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=contentepa=showpage&pid=96
57. Noam, E. (2003). The Internet: Still wide open and competitive? Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://tprc.org/papers/2003/200/noam_TPRC2003.pdf
58. O'Harrow, R., Jr. (2005). No place to hide: Behind the scenes of our emerging surveillance society. New York: Free Press.
59. Price, M. E. (1994).The market for loyalties: Electronic media and the global competition for allegiances. Yale Law Journal, 104, 667-705.
60. Pelikan, J. (2005). Whose Bible is it? London: Viking.
61. Quarterman, J. S. (1990). The matrix: Computer networks and conferencing systems worldwide. Bedford, MA: Digital.
62. Ravitch,D. (2003). The language police: How pressure groups restrict what students learn. New York: Knopf.
63. Rheingold, H. (1998). The virtual community. Retrieved March 29, 2005, from http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/
64. Rice, R. E., & Bair, J. H. (1984). New organizational media and productivity. In R. E. Rice (Ed.), The new media:Communication, research, and technology (pp. 185-215). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65. Rosen, C. (2004-2005). The age of egocasting. The New Atlantis, 7, 51-72.
66. Sanderson, I. (2000). Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation, 6, 433-454.
67. Schumpeter, J. A. (1975). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
68. Severin,W. J., & Tankard, J.W. (1992). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
69. Shapiro, A. (1998). Digital middlemen and the architecture of electronic commerce. Ohio Northern Law Review, 24, 795-812.
70. Sheu,T. R., & Carley, K. (2001, October 27). Monopoly power on the web:Apreliminary investigation of search engines. Paper presented at the 29th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. Retrieved June 7, 2005 from http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0109/0109054.pdf
71. Silverstone, R., (2005). Mediation and communication. In C. Calhoun, C. Rojek, & B. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of sociology. London: Sage. Also available at www.lse.uc.uk/ collections/medialse/pdf/mediation.pdf
72. Simmons, S. J. (1978).The fairness doctrine and the media. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Singh, J. P. (1999). Universal service: Competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system, and telecommunications competition: The last ten miles. Technology and Culture, 40, 450-452.
74. Søndergaard, H. (1999). Some reflections on public service broadcasting. NordicomReview1. Retrieved May 7, 2005, from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/common/publ_pdf/33_sondergaard.pdf
75. Stites, J. (1994,May). Complexity:Research on complex systems and complex adaptive systems. Omni Magazine. Retrieved April 6, 2006, from www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1430/is_n8_v16/ai_15347893
76. Streeter, T. (1990). Beyond freedom of speech and the public interest: The relevance of critical legal studies to communications policy. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 43-63.
77. Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78. Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.
79. Ulen, T. S. (2001). Democracy and the Internet. [Review of the book Republic.com]. Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, 2, 224.
80. van Zandt, T. (2001). Information overload in a network of targeted communication (CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2836). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
81. Varian, H., & Lyman, P. (2003). How much information? Retrieved June 5, 2005, from http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/
82. Walker, J. (2002). Links and power: The political economy of linking on theWeb. Proceedings of hypertext 2002 (pp. 78-79). Baltimore: ACM Press.
83. White,D. M. (1950). The "gate keeper": A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383-390.
84. Wolfram, S. (1988). Emerging syntheses in science. In X. XXXX (Ed.), Proceedings of the founding workshops of the Santa Fe Institute (pp. 183-189). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
85. Zuboff, S., & Maxim, J. (2002). The support economy. London: Allen Lane.